A Bayesian model of context-sensitive value attribution

  1. Francesco Rigoli  Is a corresponding author
  2. Karl J Friston
  3. Cristina Martinelli
  4. Mirjana Selaković
  5. Sukhwinder S Shergill
  6. Raymond J Dolan
  1. University College London, United Kingdom
  2. University College London, United Kingdom
  3. King's College London, United Kingdom
  4. Sismanogleio General Hospital, Greece

Abstract

Substantial evidence indicates that incentive value depends on an anticipation of rewards within a given context. However, the computations underlying this context sensitivity remain unknown. To address this question we introduce a normative (Bayesian) account of how rewards map to incentive values. This assumes that the brain inverts a model of how rewards are generated. Key features of our account include (i) an influence of prior beliefs about the context in which rewards are delivered (weighted by their reliability in a Bayes-optimal fashion), (ii) the notion that incentive values correspond to precision-weighted prediction errors, (iii) and contextual information unfolding at different hierarchical levels. This formulation implies that incentive value is intrinsically context-dependent. We provide empirical support for this model by showing that incentive value is influenced by context variability and by hierarchically nested contexts. The perspective we introduce generates new empirical predictions that might help explaining psychopathologies, such as addiction.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Francesco Rigoli

    The Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    f.rigoli@ucl.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Karl J Friston

    The Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Cristina Martinelli

    Department of Psychosis Studies, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Mirjana Selaković

    Department of Psychiatry, Sismanogleio General Hospital, Athens, Greece
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Sukhwinder S Shergill

    Department of Psychosis Studies, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Raymond J Dolan

    The Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Ethics

Human subjects: Experiment one was approved by the University College London Research Ethics Committee. Experiment two was approved by the King's College of London Research Ethics Committee. All participants provided written informed consent and were paid for participating.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Sam Gershman

Publication history

  1. Received: March 16, 2016
  2. Accepted: June 16, 2016
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: June 21, 2016 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: July 18, 2016 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2016, Rigoli et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,964
    Page views
  • 430
    Downloads
  • 18
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Scopus, Crossref, PubMed Central.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Francesco Rigoli
  2. Karl J Friston
  3. Cristina Martinelli
  4. Mirjana Selaković
  5. Sukhwinder S Shergill
  6. Raymond J Dolan
(2016)
A Bayesian model of context-sensitive value attribution
eLife 5:e16127.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.16127

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Oliver Rübel, Andrew Tritt ... Kristofer E Bouchard
    Tools and Resources

    The neurophysiology of cells and tissues are monitored electrophysiologically and optically in diverse experiments and species, ranging from flies to humans. Understanding the brain requires integration of data across this diversity, and thus these data must be findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable (FAIR). This requires a standard language for data and metadata that can coevolve with neuroscience. We describe design and implementation principles for a language for neurophysiology data. Our open-source software (Neurodata Without Borders, NWB) defines and modularizes the interdependent, yet separable, components of a data language. We demonstrate NWB’s impact through unified description of neurophysiology data across diverse modalities and species. NWB exists in an ecosystem, which includes data management, analysis, visualization, and archive tools. Thus, the NWB data language enables reproduction, interchange, and reuse of diverse neurophysiology data. More broadly, the design principles of NWB are generally applicable to enhance discovery across biology through data FAIRness.

    1. Neuroscience
    Joonkoo Park, David E Huber
    Research Article

    Many species of animals exhibit an intuitive sense of number, suggesting a fundamental neural mechanism for representing numerosity in a visual scene. Recent empirical studies demonstrate that early feedforward visual responses are sensitive to numerosity of a dot array but substantially less so to continuous dimensions orthogonal to numerosity, such as size and spacing of the dots. However, the mechanisms that extract numerosity are unknown. Here we identified the core neurocomputational principles underlying these effects: (1) center-surround contrast filters; (2) at different spatial scales; with (3) divisive normalization across network units. In an untrained computational model, these principles eliminated sensitivity to size and spacing, making numerosity the main determinant of the neuronal response magnitude. Moreover, a model implementation of these principles explained both well-known and relatively novel illusions of numerosity perception across space and time. This supports the conclusion that the neural structures and feedforward processes that encode numerosity naturally produce visual illusions of numerosity. Together, these results identify a set of neurocomputational properties that gives rise to the ubiquity of the number sense in the animal kingdom.