ESCRT-III drives the final stages of CUPS maturation for unconventional protein secretion

  1. Amy J Curwin
  2. Nathalie Brouwers
  3. Manuel Alonso Y Adell
  4. David Teis
  5. Gabriele Turacchio
  6. Seetharaman Parashuraman
  7. Paolo Ronchi
  8. Vivek Malhotra  Is a corresponding author
  1. Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Spain
  2. The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Spain
  3. Medical University of Innsbruck, Austria
  4. National Research Council of Italy, Italy
  5. European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Germany

Abstract

The unconventional secretory pathway exports proteins that bypass the endoplasmic reticulum. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, conditions that trigger Acb1 secretion via this pathway generate a Grh1 containing compartment composed of vesicles and tubules surrounded by a cup-shaped membrane and collectively called CUPS. Here we report a quantitative assay for Acb1 secretion that reveals requirements for ESCRT-I, -II, and -III but, surprisingly, without the involvement of the Vps4 AAA-ATPase. The major ESCRT-III subunit Snf7 localizes transiently to CUPS and this was accelerated in vps4Δ cells, correlating with increased Acb1 secretion. Microscopic analysis suggests that, instead of forming intraluminal vesicles with the help of Vps4, ESCRT-III/Snf7 promotes direct engulfment of preexisting Grh1 containing vesicles and tubules into a saccule to generate a mature Acb1 containing compartment. This novel multivesicular / multilamellar compartment, we suggest represents the stable secretory form of CUPS that is competent for the release of Acb1 to cells exterior.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Amy J Curwin

    Centre for Genomic Regulation, Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Nathalie Brouwers

    Centre for Genomic Regulation, The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Manuel Alonso Y Adell

    Division of Cell Biology, Biocenter, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. David Teis

    Division of Cell Biology, Biocenter, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Gabriele Turacchio

    Institute of Protein Biochemistry, National Research Council of Italy, Naples, Italy
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Seetharaman Parashuraman

    Institute of Protein Biochemistry, National Research Council of Italy, Naples, Italy
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Paolo Ronchi

    Electron Microscopy Core Facility, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Vivek Malhotra

    Centre for Genomic Regulation, The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain
    For correspondence
    vivek.malhotra@crg.eu
    Competing interests
    Vivek Malhotra, Senior editor, eLife.

Copyright

© 2016, Curwin et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,365
    views
  • 797
    downloads
  • 59
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Amy J Curwin
  2. Nathalie Brouwers
  3. Manuel Alonso Y Adell
  4. David Teis
  5. Gabriele Turacchio
  6. Seetharaman Parashuraman
  7. Paolo Ronchi
  8. Vivek Malhotra
(2016)
ESCRT-III drives the final stages of CUPS maturation for unconventional protein secretion
eLife 5:e16299.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.16299

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.16299

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Developmental Biology
    Sofía Suárez Freire, Sebastián Perez-Pandolfo ... Mariana Melani
    Research Article

    Eukaryotic cells depend on exocytosis to direct intracellularly synthesized material toward the extracellular space or the plasma membrane, so exocytosis constitutes a basic function for cellular homeostasis and communication between cells. The secretory pathway includes biogenesis of secretory granules (SGs), their maturation and fusion with the plasma membrane (exocytosis), resulting in release of SG content to the extracellular space. The larval salivary gland of Drosophila melanogaster is an excellent model for studying exocytosis. This gland synthesizes mucins that are packaged in SGs that sprout from the trans-Golgi network and then undergo a maturation process that involves homotypic fusion, condensation, and acidification. Finally, mature SGs are directed to the apical domain of the plasma membrane with which they fuse, releasing their content into the gland lumen. The exocyst is a hetero-octameric complex that participates in tethering of vesicles to the plasma membrane during constitutive exocytosis. By precise temperature-dependent gradual activation of the Gal4-UAS expression system, we have induced different levels of silencing of exocyst complex subunits, and identified three temporarily distinctive steps of the regulated exocytic pathway where the exocyst is critically required: SG biogenesis, SG maturation, and SG exocytosis. Our results shed light on previously unidentified functions of the exocyst along the exocytic pathway. We propose that the exocyst acts as a general tethering factor in various steps of this cellular process.

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Kourosh Hayatigolkhatmi, Chiara Soriani ... Simona Rodighiero
    Tools and Resources

    Understanding the cell cycle at the single-cell level is crucial for cellular biology and cancer research. While current methods using fluorescent markers have improved the study of adherent cells, non-adherent cells remain challenging. In this study, we addressed this gap by combining a specialized surface to enhance cell attachment, the FUCCI(CA)2 sensor, an automated image analysis pipeline, and a custom machine learning algorithm. This approach enabled precise measurement of cell cycle phase durations in non-adherent cells. This method was validated in acute myeloid leukemia cell lines NB4 and Kasumi-1, which have unique cell cycle characteristics, and we tested the impact of cell cycle-modulating drugs on NB4 cells. Our cell cycle analysis system, which is also compatible with adherent cells, is fully automated and freely available, providing detailed insights from hundreds of cells under various conditions. This report presents a valuable tool for advancing cancer research and drug development by enabling comprehensive, automated cell cycle analysis in both adherent and non-adherent cells.