Subretinal mononuclear phagocytes induce cone segment loss via IL-1β

  1. Chiara M Eandi
  2. Hugo Charles Messance
  3. Sébastien Augustin
  4. Elisa Dominguez
  5. Sophie Lavalette
  6. Valérie Forster  Is a corresponding author
  7. Shulong Justin Hu
  8. Lourdes Siquieros
  9. Cheryl Mae Craft
  10. José-Alain Sahel
  11. Ramin Tadayoni
  12. Michel Paques
  13. Xavier Guillonneau
  14. Florian Sennlaub  Is a corresponding author
  1. Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, CNRS, France
  2. Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, United States

Abstract

Photo-transduction in cone segments (CS) is crucial for high acuity daytime vision. For ill-defined reasons, CS degenerate in retinitis pigmentosa (RP) and in the transitional zone (TZ) of atrophic zones (AZ), which characterize geographic atrophy (GA). Our experiments confirm the loss of cone segments (CS) in the TZ of GA patients and show their association with subretinal CD14+mononuclear phagocyte (MP) infiltration that is also reported in RP. Using human and mouse MPs in vitro and inflammation-prone Cx3cr1GFP/GFP mice in vivo, we demonstrate that MP derived IL-1β leads to severe CS degeneration. Our results strongly suggest that subretinal MP accumulation participates in the observed pathological photoreceptor changes in these diseases. Inhibiting subretinal MP accumulation or Il-1β might protect the CS and help preserve high acuity daytime vision in conditions characterized by subretinal inflammation, such as AMD and RP.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Chiara M Eandi

    Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, CNRS, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3656-1689
  2. Hugo Charles Messance

    Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, CNRS, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Sébastien Augustin

    Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, CNRS, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Elisa Dominguez

    Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, CNRS, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Sophie Lavalette

    Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, CNRS, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Valérie Forster

    Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, CNRS, Paris, France
    For correspondence
    valerie.fradot@inserm.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Shulong Justin Hu

    Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, CNRS, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Lourdes Siquieros

    Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, CNRS, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Cheryl Mae Craft

    Mary D. Allen Laboratory for Vision Research, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los ANgeles, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. José-Alain Sahel

    Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, CNRS, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Ramin Tadayoni

    Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, CNRS, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Michel Paques

    Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, CNRS, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Xavier Guillonneau

    Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, CNRS, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7379-3935
  14. Florian Sennlaub

    Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, CNRS, Paris, France
    For correspondence
    florian.sennlaub@inserm.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4412-1341

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (MACLEAR)

  • Sébastien Augustin
  • Elisa Dominguez
  • Sophie Lavalette
  • Shulong Justin Hu
  • Lourdes Siquieros
  • José-Alain Sahel
  • Michel Paques
  • Xavier Guillonneau
  • Florian Sennlaub

Labex (lifescience)

  • Chiara M Eandi
  • Hugo Charles Messance
  • Sébastien Augustin
  • Elisa Dominguez
  • Sophie Lavalette
  • Shulong Justin Hu
  • Lourdes Siquieros
  • José-Alain Sahel
  • Ramin Tadayoni
  • Michel Paques
  • Xavier Guillonneau
  • Florian Sennlaub

adps-allianz

  • Chiara M Eandi
  • Hugo Charles Messance
  • Sébastien Augustin
  • Elisa Dominguez
  • Sophie Lavalette
  • Shulong Justin Hu
  • Lourdes Siquieros
  • José-Alain Sahel
  • Ramin Tadayoni
  • Michel Paques
  • Xavier Guillonneau
  • Florian Sennlaub

National Institutes of Health (EY015851)

  • Cheryl Mae Craft

National Institutes of Health (EY03040)

  • Cheryl Mae Craft

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experimental protocols and procedures were approved by the local animal care ethics committee (00156.02; C 92-032-02 )

Human subjects: Volunteers provided written and informed consent for the human monocyte expression studies, which were approved by the Centre national d'ophthalmologie des Quinze-Vingt hospital (Paris, France) ethics committees (no. 913572)

Copyright

© 2016, Eandi et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,516
    views
  • 323
    downloads
  • 68
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Chiara M Eandi
  2. Hugo Charles Messance
  3. Sébastien Augustin
  4. Elisa Dominguez
  5. Sophie Lavalette
  6. Valérie Forster
  7. Shulong Justin Hu
  8. Lourdes Siquieros
  9. Cheryl Mae Craft
  10. José-Alain Sahel
  11. Ramin Tadayoni
  12. Michel Paques
  13. Xavier Guillonneau
  14. Florian Sennlaub
(2016)
Subretinal mononuclear phagocytes induce cone segment loss via IL-1β
eLife 5:e16490.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.16490

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.16490

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Marine Schimel, Ta-Chu Kao, Guillaume Hennequin
    Research Article

    During delayed ballistic reaches, motor areas consistently display movement-specific activity patterns prior to movement onset. It is unclear why these patterns arise: while they have been proposed to seed an initial neural state from which the movement unfolds, recent experiments have uncovered the presence and necessity of ongoing inputs during movement, which may lessen the need for careful initialization. Here, we modeled the motor cortex as an input-driven dynamical system, and we asked what the optimal way to control this system to perform fast delayed reaches is. We find that delay-period inputs consistently arise in an optimally controlled model of M1. By studying a variety of network architectures, we could dissect and predict the situations in which it is beneficial for a network to prepare. Finally, we show that optimal input-driven control of neural dynamics gives rise to multiple phases of preparation during reach sequences, providing a novel explanation for experimentally observed features of monkey M1 activity in double reaching.

    1. Neuroscience
    Jing Jun Wong, Alessandro Bongioanni ... Bolton KH Chau
    Research Article

    Humans make irrational decisions in the presence of irrelevant distractor options. There is little consensus on whether decision making is facilitated or impaired by the presence of a highly rewarding distractor, or whether the distractor effect operates at the level of options’ component attributes rather than at the level of their overall value. To reconcile different claims, we argue that it is important to consider the diversity of people’s styles of decision making and whether choice attributes are combined in an additive or multiplicative way. Employing a multi-laboratory dataset investigating the same experimental paradigm, we demonstrated that people used a mix of both approaches and the extent to which approach was used varied across individuals. Critically, we identified that this variability was correlated with the distractor effect during decision making. Individuals who tended to use a multiplicative approach to compute value, showed a positive distractor effect. In contrast, a negative distractor effect (divisive normalisation) was prominent in individuals tending towards an additive approach. Findings suggest that the distractor effect is related to how value is constructed, which in turn may be influenced by task and subject specificities. This concurs with recent behavioural and neuroscience findings that multiple distractor effects co-exist.