Subretinal mononuclear phagocytes induce cone segment loss via IL-1β

  1. Chiara M Eandi
  2. Hugo Charles Messance
  3. Sébastien Augustin
  4. Elisa Dominguez
  5. Sophie Lavalette
  6. Valérie Forster  Is a corresponding author
  7. Shulong Justin Hu
  8. Lourdes Siquieros
  9. Cheryl Mae Craft
  10. José-Alain Sahel
  11. Ramin Tadayoni
  12. Michel Paques
  13. Xavier Guillonneau
  14. Florian Sennlaub  Is a corresponding author
  1. Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, CNRS, France
  2. Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, United States

Abstract

Photo-transduction in cone segments (CS) is crucial for high acuity daytime vision. For ill-defined reasons, CS degenerate in retinitis pigmentosa (RP) and in the transitional zone (TZ) of atrophic zones (AZ), which characterize geographic atrophy (GA). Our experiments confirm the loss of cone segments (CS) in the TZ of GA patients and show their association with subretinal CD14+mononuclear phagocyte (MP) infiltration that is also reported in RP. Using human and mouse MPs in vitro and inflammation-prone Cx3cr1GFP/GFP mice in vivo, we demonstrate that MP derived IL-1β leads to severe CS degeneration. Our results strongly suggest that subretinal MP accumulation participates in the observed pathological photoreceptor changes in these diseases. Inhibiting subretinal MP accumulation or Il-1β might protect the CS and help preserve high acuity daytime vision in conditions characterized by subretinal inflammation, such as AMD and RP.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Chiara M Eandi

    Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, CNRS, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3656-1689
  2. Hugo Charles Messance

    Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, CNRS, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Sébastien Augustin

    Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, CNRS, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Elisa Dominguez

    Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, CNRS, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Sophie Lavalette

    Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, CNRS, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Valérie Forster

    Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, CNRS, Paris, France
    For correspondence
    valerie.fradot@inserm.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Shulong Justin Hu

    Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, CNRS, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Lourdes Siquieros

    Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, CNRS, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Cheryl Mae Craft

    Mary D. Allen Laboratory for Vision Research, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los ANgeles, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. José-Alain Sahel

    Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, CNRS, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Ramin Tadayoni

    Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, CNRS, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Michel Paques

    Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, CNRS, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Xavier Guillonneau

    Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, CNRS, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7379-3935
  14. Florian Sennlaub

    Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, CNRS, Paris, France
    For correspondence
    florian.sennlaub@inserm.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4412-1341

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (MACLEAR)

  • Sébastien Augustin
  • Elisa Dominguez
  • Sophie Lavalette
  • Shulong Justin Hu
  • Lourdes Siquieros
  • José-Alain Sahel
  • Michel Paques
  • Xavier Guillonneau
  • Florian Sennlaub

Labex (lifescience)

  • Chiara M Eandi
  • Hugo Charles Messance
  • Sébastien Augustin
  • Elisa Dominguez
  • Sophie Lavalette
  • Shulong Justin Hu
  • Lourdes Siquieros
  • José-Alain Sahel
  • Ramin Tadayoni
  • Michel Paques
  • Xavier Guillonneau
  • Florian Sennlaub

adps-allianz

  • Chiara M Eandi
  • Hugo Charles Messance
  • Sébastien Augustin
  • Elisa Dominguez
  • Sophie Lavalette
  • Shulong Justin Hu
  • Lourdes Siquieros
  • José-Alain Sahel
  • Ramin Tadayoni
  • Michel Paques
  • Xavier Guillonneau
  • Florian Sennlaub

National Institutes of Health (EY015851)

  • Cheryl Mae Craft

National Institutes of Health (EY03040)

  • Cheryl Mae Craft

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Jeremy Nathans, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experimental protocols and procedures were approved by the local animal care ethics committee (00156.02; C 92-032-02 )

Human subjects: Volunteers provided written and informed consent for the human monocyte expression studies, which were approved by the Centre national d'ophthalmologie des Quinze-Vingt hospital (Paris, France) ethics committees (no. 913572)

Version history

  1. Received: April 2, 2016
  2. Accepted: July 19, 2016
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: July 20, 2016 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: August 1, 2016 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2016, Eandi et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,487
    views
  • 317
    downloads
  • 61
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Chiara M Eandi
  2. Hugo Charles Messance
  3. Sébastien Augustin
  4. Elisa Dominguez
  5. Sophie Lavalette
  6. Valérie Forster
  7. Shulong Justin Hu
  8. Lourdes Siquieros
  9. Cheryl Mae Craft
  10. José-Alain Sahel
  11. Ramin Tadayoni
  12. Michel Paques
  13. Xavier Guillonneau
  14. Florian Sennlaub
(2016)
Subretinal mononuclear phagocytes induce cone segment loss via IL-1β
eLife 5:e16490.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.16490

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.16490

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Mariana I Tsap, Andriy S Yatsenko ... Halyna R Shcherbata
    Research Article Updated

    Mutations in Drosophila Swiss cheese (SWS) gene or its vertebrate orthologue neuropathy target esterase (NTE) lead to progressive neuronal degeneration in flies and humans. Despite its enzymatic function as a phospholipase is well established, the molecular mechanism responsible for maintaining nervous system integrity remains unclear. In this study, we found that NTE/SWS is present in surface glia that forms the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and that NTE/SWS is important to maintain its structure and permeability. Importantly, BBB glia-specific expression of Drosophila NTE/SWS or human NTE in the sws mutant background fully rescues surface glial organization and partially restores BBB integrity, suggesting a conserved function of NTE/SWS. Interestingly, sws mutant glia showed abnormal organization of plasma membrane domains and tight junction rafts accompanied by the accumulation of lipid droplets, lysosomes, and multilamellar bodies. Since the observed cellular phenotypes closely resemble the characteristics described in a group of metabolic disorders known as lysosomal storage diseases (LSDs), our data established a novel connection between NTE/SWS and these conditions. We found that mutants with defective BBB exhibit elevated levels of fatty acids, which are precursors of eicosanoids and are involved in the inflammatory response. Also, as a consequence of a permeable BBB, several innate immunity factors are upregulated in an age-dependent manner, while BBB glia-specific expression of NTE/SWS normalizes inflammatory response. Treatment with anti-inflammatory agents prevents the abnormal architecture of the BBB, suggesting that inflammation contributes to the maintenance of a healthy brain barrier. Considering the link between a malfunctioning BBB and various neurodegenerative diseases, gaining a deeper understanding of the molecular mechanisms causing inflammation due to a defective BBB could help to promote the use of anti-inflammatory therapies for age-related neurodegeneration.

    1. Neuroscience
    Mohsen Sadeghi, Reza Sharif Razavian ... Dagmar Sternad
    Research Article

    Natural behaviors have redundancy, which implies that humans and animals can achieve their goals with different strategies. Given only observations of behavior, is it possible to infer the control objective that the subject is employing? This challenge is particularly acute in animal behavior because we cannot ask or instruct the subject to use a particular strategy. This study presents a three-pronged approach to infer an animal’s control objective from behavior. First, both humans and monkeys performed a virtual balancing task for which different control strategies could be utilized. Under matched experimental conditions, corresponding behaviors were observed in humans and monkeys. Second, a generative model was developed that represented two main control objectives to achieve the task goal. Model simulations were used to identify aspects of behavior that could distinguish which control objective was being used. Third, these behavioral signatures allowed us to infer the control objective used by human subjects who had been instructed to use one control objective or the other. Based on this validation, we could then infer objectives from animal subjects. Being able to positively identify a subject’s control objective from observed behavior can provide a powerful tool to neurophysiologists as they seek the neural mechanisms of sensorimotor coordination.