Protein arginine methylation facilitates KCNQ channel-PIP2 interaction leading to seizure suppression

  1. Hyun-Ji Kim
  2. Myong-Ho Jeong
  3. Kyung-Ran Kim
  4. Chang-Yun Jung
  5. Seul-Yi Lee
  6. Hanna Kim
  7. Jewoo Koh
  8. Tuan Anh Vuong
  9. Seungmoon Jung
  10. Hyunwoo Yang
  11. Su-Kyung Park
  12. Dahee Choi
  13. Sung Hun Kim
  14. KyeongJin Kang
  15. Jong-Woo Sohn
  16. Joo Min Park
  17. Daejong Jeon
  18. Seung-Hoi Koo
  19. Won-Kyung Ho
  20. Jong-Sun Kang  Is a corresponding author
  21. Seong-Tae Kim  Is a corresponding author
  22. Hana Cho  Is a corresponding author
  1. Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Republic of Korea
  2. Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Republic of Korea
  3. Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Republic of Korea
  4. Kangwon National University, Republic of Korea
  5. Institute for Basic Science, Republic of Korea
  6. Seoul National University Hospital, Republic of Korea
  7. Korea University, Republic of Korea

Abstract

KCNQ channels are critical determinants of neuronal excitability, thus emerging as a novel target of anti-epileptic drugs. To date, the mechanisms of KCNQ channel modulation have been mostly characterized to be inhibitory via Gq-coupled receptors, Ca2+/CaM, and protein kinase C. Here we demonstrate that methylation of KCNQ by protein arginine methyltransferase 1 (Prmt1) positively regulates KCNQ channel activity, thereby preventing neuronal hyperexcitability. Prmt1+/- mice exhibit epileptic seizures. Methylation of KCNQ2 channels at 4 arginine residues by Prmt1 enhances PIP2 binding, and Prmt1 depletion lowers PIP2 affinity of KCNQ2 channels and thereby the channel activities. Consistently, exogenous PIP2 addition to Prmt1+/- neurons restores KCNQ currents and neuronal excitability to the WT level. Collectively, we propose that Prmt1-dependent facilitation of KCNQ-PIP2 interaction underlies the positive regulation of KCNQ activity by arginine methylation, which may serve as a key target for prevention of neuronal hyperexcitability and seizures.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Hyun-Ji Kim

    Department of Physiology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Myong-Ho Jeong

    Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Kyung-Ran Kim

    Department of Physiology, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Chang-Yun Jung

    Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Seul-Yi Lee

    Department of Physiology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Hanna Kim

    Department of Physiology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Jewoo Koh

    Department of Physiology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4977-3728
  8. Tuan Anh Vuong

    Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Seungmoon Jung

    Department of Bio and Brain Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Hyunwoo Yang

    Department of Bio and Brain Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Su-Kyung Park

    Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Dahee Choi

    Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7672-461X
  13. Sung Hun Kim

    Department of Neurology, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. KyeongJin Kang

    Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0446-469X
  15. Jong-Woo Sohn

    Department of Biological Sciences, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Joo Min Park

    Center for Cognition and Sociality, Institute for Basic Science, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Daejong Jeon

    Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  18. Seung-Hoi Koo

    Division of Life Sciences, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  19. Won-Kyung Ho

    Department of Physiology, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1568-1710
  20. Jong-Sun Kang

    Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea
    For correspondence
    kangj01@skku.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  21. Seong-Tae Kim

    Departments of Molecular Cell Biology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea
    For correspondence
    stkim@skku.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  22. Hana Cho

    Department of Physiology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea
    For correspondence
    hanacho@skku.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9394-8671

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2012R1A2A2A01046878)

  • Hyun-Ji Kim
  • Seul-Yi Lee
  • Hanna Kim
  • Jewoo Koh
  • Hana Cho

National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2015R1A2A1A15051998)

  • Myong-Ho Jeong
  • Tuan Anh Vuong
  • Jong-Sun Kang

National Research Foundation of Korea (2015-048055)

  • Kyung-Ran Kim
  • Won-Kyung Ho

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Indira M Raman, Northwestern University, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Research Advisory Committee at Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine Laboratory Animal Research Center (Approval No. IACUC-11-39).

Version history

  1. Received: April 22, 2016
  2. Accepted: July 27, 2016
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: July 28, 2016 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: August 24, 2016 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2016, Kim et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,659
    views
  • 696
    downloads
  • 34
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Hyun-Ji Kim
  2. Myong-Ho Jeong
  3. Kyung-Ran Kim
  4. Chang-Yun Jung
  5. Seul-Yi Lee
  6. Hanna Kim
  7. Jewoo Koh
  8. Tuan Anh Vuong
  9. Seungmoon Jung
  10. Hyunwoo Yang
  11. Su-Kyung Park
  12. Dahee Choi
  13. Sung Hun Kim
  14. KyeongJin Kang
  15. Jong-Woo Sohn
  16. Joo Min Park
  17. Daejong Jeon
  18. Seung-Hoi Koo
  19. Won-Kyung Ho
  20. Jong-Sun Kang
  21. Seong-Tae Kim
  22. Hana Cho
(2016)
Protein arginine methylation facilitates KCNQ channel-PIP2 interaction leading to seizure suppression
eLife 5:e17159.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17159

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17159

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Mohsen Sadeghi, Reza Sharif Razavian ... Dagmar Sternad
    Research Article

    Natural behaviors have redundancy, which implies that humans and animals can achieve their goals with different strategies. Given only observations of behavior, is it possible to infer the control objective that the subject is employing? This challenge is particularly acute in animal behavior because we cannot ask or instruct the subject to use a particular strategy. This study presents a three-pronged approach to infer an animal’s control objective from behavior. First, both humans and monkeys performed a virtual balancing task for which different control strategies could be utilized. Under matched experimental conditions, corresponding behaviors were observed in humans and monkeys. Second, a generative model was developed that represented two main control objectives to achieve the task goal. Model simulations were used to identify aspects of behavior that could distinguish which control objective was being used. Third, these behavioral signatures allowed us to infer the control objective used by human subjects who had been instructed to use one control objective or the other. Based on this validation, we could then infer objectives from animal subjects. Being able to positively identify a subject’s control objective from observed behavior can provide a powerful tool to neurophysiologists as they seek the neural mechanisms of sensorimotor coordination.

    1. Neuroscience
    Yiyi Chen, Laimdota Zizmare ... Christoph Trautwein
    Research Article

    The retina consumes massive amounts of energy, yet its metabolism and substrate exploitation remain poorly understood. Here, we used a murine explant model to manipulate retinal energy metabolism under entirely controlled conditions and utilised 1H-NMR spectroscopy-based metabolomics, in situ enzyme detection, and cell viability readouts to uncover the pathways of retinal energy production. Our experimental manipulations resulted in varying degrees of photoreceptor degeneration, while the inner retina and retinal pigment epithelium were essentially unaffected. This selective vulnerability of photoreceptors suggested very specific adaptations in their energy metabolism. Rod photoreceptors were found to rely strongly on oxidative phosphorylation, but only mildly on glycolysis. Conversely, cone photoreceptors were dependent on glycolysis but insensitive to electron transport chain decoupling. Importantly, photoreceptors appeared to uncouple glycolytic and Krebs-cycle metabolism via three different pathways: (1) the mini-Krebs-cycle, fuelled by glutamine and branched chain amino acids, generating N-acetylaspartate; (2) the alanine-generating Cahill-cycle; (3) the lactate-releasing Cori-cycle. Moreover, the metabolomics data indicated a shuttling of taurine and hypotaurine between the retinal pigment epithelium and photoreceptors, likely resulting in an additional net transfer of reducing power to photoreceptors. These findings expand our understanding of retinal physiology and pathology and shed new light on neuronal energy homeostasis and the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases.