Protein arginine methylation facilitates KCNQ channel-PIP2 interaction leading to seizure suppression

  1. Hyun-Ji Kim
  2. Myong-Ho Jeong
  3. Kyung-Ran Kim
  4. Chang-Yun Jung
  5. Seul-Yi Lee
  6. Hanna Kim
  7. Jewoo Koh
  8. Tuan Anh Vuong
  9. Seungmoon Jung
  10. Hyunwoo Yang
  11. Su-Kyung Park
  12. Dahee Choi
  13. Sung Hun Kim
  14. KyeongJin Kang
  15. Jong-Woo Sohn
  16. Joo Min Park
  17. Daejong Jeon
  18. Seung-Hoi Koo
  19. Won-Kyung Ho
  20. Jong-Sun Kang  Is a corresponding author
  21. Seong-Tae Kim  Is a corresponding author
  22. Hana Cho  Is a corresponding author
  1. Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Republic of Korea
  2. Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Republic of Korea
  3. Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Republic of Korea
  4. Kangwon National University, Republic of Korea
  5. Institute for Basic Science, Republic of Korea
  6. Seoul National University Hospital, Republic of Korea
  7. Korea University, Republic of Korea

Abstract

KCNQ channels are critical determinants of neuronal excitability, thus emerging as a novel target of anti-epileptic drugs. To date, the mechanisms of KCNQ channel modulation have been mostly characterized to be inhibitory via Gq-coupled receptors, Ca2+/CaM, and protein kinase C. Here we demonstrate that methylation of KCNQ by protein arginine methyltransferase 1 (Prmt1) positively regulates KCNQ channel activity, thereby preventing neuronal hyperexcitability. Prmt1+/- mice exhibit epileptic seizures. Methylation of KCNQ2 channels at 4 arginine residues by Prmt1 enhances PIP2 binding, and Prmt1 depletion lowers PIP2 affinity of KCNQ2 channels and thereby the channel activities. Consistently, exogenous PIP2 addition to Prmt1+/- neurons restores KCNQ currents and neuronal excitability to the WT level. Collectively, we propose that Prmt1-dependent facilitation of KCNQ-PIP2 interaction underlies the positive regulation of KCNQ activity by arginine methylation, which may serve as a key target for prevention of neuronal hyperexcitability and seizures.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Hyun-Ji Kim

    Department of Physiology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Myong-Ho Jeong

    Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Kyung-Ran Kim

    Department of Physiology, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Chang-Yun Jung

    Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Seul-Yi Lee

    Department of Physiology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Hanna Kim

    Department of Physiology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Jewoo Koh

    Department of Physiology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4977-3728
  8. Tuan Anh Vuong

    Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Seungmoon Jung

    Department of Bio and Brain Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Hyunwoo Yang

    Department of Bio and Brain Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Su-Kyung Park

    Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Dahee Choi

    Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7672-461X
  13. Sung Hun Kim

    Department of Neurology, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. KyeongJin Kang

    Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0446-469X
  15. Jong-Woo Sohn

    Department of Biological Sciences, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Joo Min Park

    Center for Cognition and Sociality, Institute for Basic Science, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Daejong Jeon

    Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  18. Seung-Hoi Koo

    Division of Life Sciences, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  19. Won-Kyung Ho

    Department of Physiology, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1568-1710
  20. Jong-Sun Kang

    Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea
    For correspondence
    kangj01@skku.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  21. Seong-Tae Kim

    Departments of Molecular Cell Biology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea
    For correspondence
    stkim@skku.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  22. Hana Cho

    Department of Physiology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea
    For correspondence
    hanacho@skku.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9394-8671

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2012R1A2A2A01046878)

  • Hyun-Ji Kim
  • Seul-Yi Lee
  • Hanna Kim
  • Jewoo Koh
  • Hana Cho

National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2015R1A2A1A15051998)

  • Myong-Ho Jeong
  • Tuan Anh Vuong
  • Jong-Sun Kang

National Research Foundation of Korea (2015-048055)

  • Kyung-Ran Kim
  • Won-Kyung Ho

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Research Advisory Committee at Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine Laboratory Animal Research Center (Approval No. IACUC-11-39).

Copyright

© 2016, Kim et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,727
    views
  • 720
    downloads
  • 35
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Hyun-Ji Kim
  2. Myong-Ho Jeong
  3. Kyung-Ran Kim
  4. Chang-Yun Jung
  5. Seul-Yi Lee
  6. Hanna Kim
  7. Jewoo Koh
  8. Tuan Anh Vuong
  9. Seungmoon Jung
  10. Hyunwoo Yang
  11. Su-Kyung Park
  12. Dahee Choi
  13. Sung Hun Kim
  14. KyeongJin Kang
  15. Jong-Woo Sohn
  16. Joo Min Park
  17. Daejong Jeon
  18. Seung-Hoi Koo
  19. Won-Kyung Ho
  20. Jong-Sun Kang
  21. Seong-Tae Kim
  22. Hana Cho
(2016)
Protein arginine methylation facilitates KCNQ channel-PIP2 interaction leading to seizure suppression
eLife 5:e17159.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17159

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17159

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    John P Grogan, Matthias Raemaekers ... Sanjay G Manohar
    Research Article

    Motivation depends on dopamine, but might be modulated by acetylcholine which influences dopamine release in the striatum, and amplifies motivation in animal studies. A corresponding effect in humans would be important clinically, since anticholinergic drugs are frequently used in Parkinson’s disease, a condition that can also disrupt motivation. Reward and dopamine make us more ready to respond, as indexed by reaction times (RT), and move faster, sometimes termed vigour. These effects may be controlled by preparatory processes that can be tracked using electroencephalography (EEG). We measured vigour in a placebo-controlled, double-blinded study of trihexyphenidyl (THP), a muscarinic antagonist, with an incentivised eye movement task and EEG. Participants responded faster and with greater vigour when incentives were high, but THP blunted these motivational effects, suggesting that muscarinic receptors facilitate invigoration by reward. Preparatory EEG build-up (contingent negative variation [CNV]) was strengthened by high incentives and by muscarinic blockade, although THP reduced the incentive effect. The amplitude of preparatory activity predicted both vigour and RT, although over distinct scalp regions; frontal activity predicted vigour, whereas a larger, earlier, central component predicted RT. The incentivisation of RT was partly mediated by the CNV, though vigour was not. Moreover, the CNV mediated the drug’s effect on dampening incentives, suggesting that muscarinic receptors underlie the motivational influence on this preparatory activity. Taken together, these findings show that a muscarinic blocker impairs motivated action in healthy people, and that medial frontal preparatory neural activity mediates this for RT.

    1. Neuroscience
    Samyogita Hardikar, Bronte Mckeown ... Jonathan Smallwood
    Research Article

    Complex macro-scale patterns of brain activity that emerge during periods of wakeful rest provide insight into the organisation of neural function, how these differentiate individuals based on their traits, and the neural basis of different types of self-generated thoughts. Although brain activity during wakeful rest is valuable for understanding important features of human cognition, its unconstrained nature makes it difficult to disentangle neural features related to personality traits from those related to the thoughts occurring at rest. Our study builds on recent perspectives from work on ongoing conscious thought that highlight the interactions between three brain networks – ventral and dorsal attention networks, as well as the default mode network. We combined measures of personality with state-of-the-art indices of ongoing thoughts at rest and brain imaging analysis and explored whether this ‘tri-partite’ view can provide a framework within which to understand the contribution of states and traits to observed patterns of neural activity at rest. To capture macro-scale relationships between different brain systems, we calculated cortical gradients to describe brain organisation in a low-dimensional space. Our analysis established that for more introverted individuals, regions of the ventral attention network were functionally more aligned to regions of the somatomotor system and the default mode network. At the same time, a pattern of detailed self-generated thought was associated with a decoupling of regions of dorsal attention from regions in the default mode network. Our study, therefore, establishes that interactions between attention systems and the default mode network are important influences on ongoing thought at rest and highlights the value of integrating contemporary perspectives on conscious experience when understanding patterns of brain activity at rest.