Chromosome-wide mechanisms to decouple gene expression from gene dose during sex-chromosome evolution

  1. Bayly S Wheeler
  2. Erika Anderson
  3. Christian Frøkjær-Jensen
  4. Qian Bian
  5. Erik Jorgensen
  6. Barbara J Meyer  Is a corresponding author
  1. Rhodes College, United States
  2. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California, Berkeley, United States
  3. Stanford University, United States
  4. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Utah, United States

Abstract

Changes in chromosome number impair fitness by disrupting the balance of gene expression. Here we analyze mechanisms to compensate for changes in gene dose that accompanied the evolution of sex chromosomes from autosomes. Using single-copy transgenes integrated throughout the Caenorhabditis elegans genome, we show that expression of all X-linked transgenes is balanced between XX hermaphrodites and XO males. However, proximity of a dosage compensation complex (DCC) binding site (rex site) is neither necessary to repress X-linked transgenes nor sufficient to repress transgenes on autosomes. Thus, X is broadly permissive for dosage compensation, and the DCC acts via a chromosome-wide mechanism to balance transcription between sexes. In contrast, no analogous X-chromosome-wide mechanism balances transcription between X and autosomes: expression of compensated hermaphrodite X-linked transgenes is half that of autosomal transgenes. Furthermore, our results argue against an X-chromosome dosage compensation model contingent upon rex-directed positioning of X relative to the nuclear periphery.

Data availability

The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Bayly S Wheeler

    Department of Biology, Rhodes College, Memphis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Erika Anderson

    Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Christian Frøkjær-Jensen

    Department of Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Qian Bian

    Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Erik Jorgensen

    Department of Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Barbara J Meyer

    Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
    For correspondence
    bjmeyer@berkeley.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6530-4588

Funding

National Institutes of Health (1R01 GM030702)

  • Barbara J Meyer

Howard Hughes Medical Institute

  • Barbara J Meyer

National Institutes of Health (1F32 GM100647)

  • Bayly S Wheeler

Howard Hughes Medical Institute

  • Christian Frøkjær-Jensen

National Institutes of Health (1R01 GM095817)

  • Erik Jorgensen

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2016, Wheeler et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,552
    views
  • 423
    downloads
  • 27
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Bayly S Wheeler
  2. Erika Anderson
  3. Christian Frøkjær-Jensen
  4. Qian Bian
  5. Erik Jorgensen
  6. Barbara J Meyer
(2016)
Chromosome-wide mechanisms to decouple gene expression from gene dose during sex-chromosome evolution
eLife 5:e17365.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17365

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17365

Further reading

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Shihui Chen, Carolyn Marie Phillips
    Research Article

    RNA interference (RNAi) is a conserved pathway that utilizes Argonaute proteins and their associated small RNAs to exert gene regulatory function on complementary transcripts. While the majority of germline-expressed RNAi proteins reside in perinuclear germ granules, it is unknown whether and how RNAi pathways are spatially organized in other cell types. Here, we find that the small RNA biogenesis machinery is spatially and temporally organized during Caenorhabditis elegans embryogenesis. Specifically, the RNAi factor, SIMR-1, forms visible concentrates during mid-embryogenesis that contain an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, a poly-UG polymerase, and the unloaded nuclear Argonaute protein, NRDE-3. Curiously, coincident with the appearance of the SIMR granules, the small RNAs bound to NRDE-3 switch from predominantly CSR-class 22G-RNAs to ERGO-dependent 22G-RNAs. NRDE-3 binds ERGO-dependent 22G-RNAs in the somatic cells of larvae and adults to silence ERGO-target genes; here we further demonstrate that NRDE-3-bound, CSR-class 22G-RNAs repress transcription in oocytes. Thus, our study defines two separable roles for NRDE-3, targeting germline-expressed genes during oogenesis to promote global transcriptional repression, and switching during embryogenesis to repress recently duplicated genes and retrotransposons in somatic cells, highlighting the plasticity of Argonaute proteins and the need for more precise temporal characterization of Argonaute-small RNA interactions.

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Steven Henikoff, David L Levens
    Insight

    A new method for mapping torsion provides insights into the ways that the genome responds to the torsion generated by RNA polymerase II.