v-SNARE transmembrane domains function as catalysts for vesicle fusion

  1. Madhurima Dhara
  2. Antonio Yarzagaray
  3. Mazen Makke
  4. Barbara Schindeldecker
  5. Yvonne Schwarz
  6. Ahmed Shaaban
  7. Satyan Sharma
  8. Rainer A Böckmann
  9. Manfred Lindau
  10. Ralf Mohrmann
  11. Dieter Bruns  Is a corresponding author
  1. Saarland University, Germany
  2. Max-Planck-Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Germany
  3. Friedrich-Alexander University, Germany

Abstract

Vesicle fusion is mediated by assembly of SNARE proteins between opposing membranes, but it is unknown whether transmembrane domains (TMDs) of SNARE proteins serve mechanistic functions that go beyond passive anchoring of the force-generating SNAREpin to the fusing membranes. Here, we show that conformational flexibility of synaptobrevin-2 TMD is essential for efficient Ca2+-triggered exocytosis and actively promotes membrane fusion as well as fusion pore expansion. Specifically, introduction of helix-stabilizing leucine residues within the TMD region spanning the vesicle's outer leaflet strongly impairs exocytosis and decelerates fusion pore dilation. In contrast, increasing the number of helix-destabilizing, ß-branched valine or isoleucine residues within the TMD restores normal secretion but accelerates fusion pore expansion beyond the rate found for the wildtype protein. These observations provide evidence that the synaptobrevin-2 TMD catalyzes the fusion process by its structural flexibility, actively setting the pace of fusion pore expansion.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Madhurima Dhara

    Institute for Physiology, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Antonio Yarzagaray

    Institute for Physiology, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Mazen Makke

    Institute for Physiology, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Barbara Schindeldecker

    Institute for Physiology, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Yvonne Schwarz

    Institute for Physiology, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Ahmed Shaaban

    Zentrum für Human- und Molekularbiologie, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Satyan Sharma

    Group Nanoscale Cell Biology, Max-Planck-Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Göttingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Rainer A Böckmann

    Computational Biology, Friedrich-Alexander University, Erlangen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Manfred Lindau

    Group Nanoscale Cell Biology, Max-Planck-Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Göttingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Ralf Mohrmann

    Zentrum für Human- und Molekularbiologie, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Dieter Bruns

    Institute for Physiology, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany
    For correspondence
    dieter.bruns@uks.eu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Copyright

© 2016, Dhara et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,159
    views
  • 683
    downloads
  • 54
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Madhurima Dhara
  2. Antonio Yarzagaray
  3. Mazen Makke
  4. Barbara Schindeldecker
  5. Yvonne Schwarz
  6. Ahmed Shaaban
  7. Satyan Sharma
  8. Rainer A Böckmann
  9. Manfred Lindau
  10. Ralf Mohrmann
  11. Dieter Bruns
(2016)
v-SNARE transmembrane domains function as catalysts for vesicle fusion
eLife 5:e17571.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17571

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17571

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Gyeong Hee Pyeon, Hyewon Cho ... Yong Sang Jo
    Research Article Updated

    Recent studies suggest that calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) neurons in the parabrachial nucleus (PBN) represent aversive information and signal a general alarm to the forebrain. If CGRP neurons serve as a true general alarm, their activation would modulate both passive nad active defensive behaviors depending on the magnitude and context of the threat. However, most prior research has focused on the role of CGRP neurons in passive freezing responses, with limited exploration of their involvement in active defensive behaviors. To address this, we examined the role of CGRP neurons in active defensive behavior using a predator-like robot programmed to chase mice. Our electrophysiological results revealed that CGRP neurons encode the intensity of aversive stimuli through variations in firing durations and amplitudes. Optogenetic activation of CGRP neurons during robot chasing elevated flight responses in both conditioning and retention tests, presumably by amplifying the perception of the threat as more imminent and dangerous. In contrast, animals with inactivated CGRP neurons exhibited reduced flight responses, even when the robot was programmed to appear highly threatening during conditioning. These findings expand the understanding of CGRP neurons in the PBN as a critical alarm system, capable of dynamically regulating active defensive behaviors by amplifying threat perception, and ensuring adaptive responses to varying levels of danger.

    1. Neuroscience
    Li Shen, Shuo Li ... Yi Jiang
    Research Article

    When observing others’ behaviors, we continuously integrate their movements with the corresponding sounds to enhance perception and develop adaptive responses. However, how the human brain integrates these complex audiovisual cues based on their natural temporal correspondence remains unclear. Using electroencephalogram (EEG), we demonstrated that rhythmic cortical activity tracked the hierarchical rhythmic structures in audiovisually congruent human walking movements and footstep sounds. Remarkably, the cortical tracking effects exhibit distinct multisensory integration modes at two temporal scales: an additive mode in a lower-order, narrower temporal integration window (step cycle) and a super-additive enhancement in a higher-order, broader temporal window (gait cycle). Furthermore, while neural responses at the lower-order timescale reflect a domain-general audiovisual integration process, cortical tracking at the higher-order timescale is exclusively engaged in the integration of biological motion cues. In addition, only this higher-order, domain-specific cortical tracking effect correlates with individuals’ autistic traits, highlighting its potential as a neural marker for autism spectrum disorder. These findings unveil the multifaceted mechanism whereby rhythmic cortical activity supports the multisensory integration of human motion, shedding light on how neural coding of hierarchical temporal structures orchestrates the processing of complex, natural stimuli across multiple timescales.