v-SNARE transmembrane domains function as catalysts for vesicle fusion

  1. Madhurima Dhara
  2. Antonio Yarzagaray
  3. Mazen Makke
  4. Barbara Schindeldecker
  5. Yvonne Schwarz
  6. Ahmed Shaaban
  7. Satyan Sharma
  8. Rainer A Böckmann
  9. Manfred Lindau
  10. Ralf Mohrmann
  11. Dieter Bruns  Is a corresponding author
  1. Saarland University, Germany
  2. Max-Planck-Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Germany
  3. Friedrich-Alexander University, Germany

Abstract

Vesicle fusion is mediated by assembly of SNARE proteins between opposing membranes, but it is unknown whether transmembrane domains (TMDs) of SNARE proteins serve mechanistic functions that go beyond passive anchoring of the force-generating SNAREpin to the fusing membranes. Here, we show that conformational flexibility of synaptobrevin-2 TMD is essential for efficient Ca2+-triggered exocytosis and actively promotes membrane fusion as well as fusion pore expansion. Specifically, introduction of helix-stabilizing leucine residues within the TMD region spanning the vesicle's outer leaflet strongly impairs exocytosis and decelerates fusion pore dilation. In contrast, increasing the number of helix-destabilizing, ß-branched valine or isoleucine residues within the TMD restores normal secretion but accelerates fusion pore expansion beyond the rate found for the wildtype protein. These observations provide evidence that the synaptobrevin-2 TMD catalyzes the fusion process by its structural flexibility, actively setting the pace of fusion pore expansion.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Madhurima Dhara

    Institute for Physiology, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Antonio Yarzagaray

    Institute for Physiology, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Mazen Makke

    Institute for Physiology, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Barbara Schindeldecker

    Institute for Physiology, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Yvonne Schwarz

    Institute for Physiology, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Ahmed Shaaban

    Zentrum für Human- und Molekularbiologie, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Satyan Sharma

    Group Nanoscale Cell Biology, Max-Planck-Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Göttingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Rainer A Böckmann

    Computational Biology, Friedrich-Alexander University, Erlangen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Manfred Lindau

    Group Nanoscale Cell Biology, Max-Planck-Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Göttingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Ralf Mohrmann

    Zentrum für Human- und Molekularbiologie, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Dieter Bruns

    Institute for Physiology, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany
    For correspondence
    dieter.bruns@uks.eu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Copyright

© 2016, Dhara et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,146
    views
  • 680
    downloads
  • 53
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Madhurima Dhara
  2. Antonio Yarzagaray
  3. Mazen Makke
  4. Barbara Schindeldecker
  5. Yvonne Schwarz
  6. Ahmed Shaaban
  7. Satyan Sharma
  8. Rainer A Böckmann
  9. Manfred Lindau
  10. Ralf Mohrmann
  11. Dieter Bruns
(2016)
v-SNARE transmembrane domains function as catalysts for vesicle fusion
eLife 5:e17571.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17571

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17571

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Rossella Conti, Céline Auger
    Research Article

    Granule cells of the cerebellum make up to 175,000 excitatory synapses on a single Purkinje cell, encoding the wide variety of information from the mossy fibre inputs into the cerebellar cortex. The granule cell axon is made of an ascending portion and a long parallel fibre extending at right angles, an architecture suggesting that synapses formed by the two segments of the axon could encode different information. There are controversial indications that ascending axon (AA) and parallel fibre (PF) synapse properties and modalities of plasticity are different. We tested the hypothesis that AA and PF synapses encode different information, and that the association of these distinct inputs to Purkinje cells might be relevant to the circuit and trigger plasticity, similar to the coincident activation of PF and climbing fibre inputs. Here, by recording synaptic currents in Purkinje cells from either proximal or distal granule cells (mostly AA and PF synapses, respectively), we describe a new form of associative plasticity between these two distinct granule cell inputs. We show for the first time that synchronous AA and PF repetitive train stimulation, with inhibition intact, triggers long-term potentiation (LTP) at AA synapses specifically. Furthermore, the timing of the presentation of the two inputs controls the outcome of plasticity and induction requires NMDAR and mGluR1 activation. The long length of the PFs allows us to preferentially activate the two inputs independently, and despite a lack of morphological reconstruction of the connections, these observations reinforce the suggestion that AA and PF synapses have different coding capabilities and plasticity that is associative, enabling effective association of information transmitted via granule cells.

    1. Neuroscience
    Bhanu Shrestha, Jiun Sang ... Youngseok Lee
    Research Article

    Sour taste, which is elicited by low pH, may serve to help animals distinguish appetitive from potentially harmful food sources. In all species studied to date, the attractiveness of oral acids is contingent on concentration. Many carboxylic acids are attractive at ecologically relevant concentrations but become aversive beyond some maximal concentration. Recent work found that Drosophila ionotropic receptors IR25a and IR76b expressed by sweet-responsive gustatory receptor neurons (GRNs) in the labellum, a peripheral gustatory organ, mediate appetitive feeding behaviors toward dilute carboxylic acids. Here, we disclose the existence of pharyngeal sensors in Drosophila melanogaster that detect ingested carboxylic acids and are also involved in the appetitive responses to carboxylic acids. These pharyngeal sensors rely on IR51b, IR94a, and IR94h, together with IR25a and IR76b, to drive responses to carboxylic acids. We then demonstrate that optogenetic activation of either Ir94a+ or Ir94h+ GRNs promotes an appetitive feeding response, confirming their contributions to appetitive feeding behavior. Our discovery of internal pharyngeal sour taste receptors opens up new avenues for investigating the internal sensation of tastants in insects.