Nucleophile sensitivity of Drosophila TRPA1 underlies light-induced feeding deterrence

  1. Eun Jo Du
  2. Tae Jung Ahn
  3. Xianlan Wen
  4. Dae-Won Seo
  5. Duk L Na
  6. Jae Young Kwon
  7. Myunghwan Choi
  8. Hyung-Wook Kim
  9. Hana Cho
  10. KyeongJin Kang  Is a corresponding author
  1. Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Republic of Korea
  2. Sungkyunkwan University, Republic of Korea
  3. Sejong University, Republic of Korea

Abstract

Solar irradiation including ultraviolet (UV) light causes tissue damage by generating reactive free radicals that can be electrophilic or nucleophilic due to unpaired electrons. Little is known about how free radicals induced by natural sunlight are rapidly detected and avoided by animals. We discover that Drosophila Transient Receptor Potential Ankyrin 1 (TRPA1), previously known only as an electrophile receptor, sensitively detects photochemically active sunlight through nucleophile sensitivity. Rapid light-dependent feeding deterrence in Drosophila was mediated only by the TRPA1(A) isoform, despite the TRPA1(A) and TRPA1(B) isoforms having similar electrophile sensitivities. Such isoform dependentce re-emerges in the detection of structurally varied nucleophilic compounds and nucleophilicity-accompanying hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). Furthermore, these isoform-dependent mechanisms require a common set of TRPA1(A)-specific residues dispensable for electrophile detection. Collectively, TRPA1(A) rapidly responds to natural sunlight intensities through its nucleophile sensitivity as a receptor of photochemically generated radicals, leading to an acute light-induced behavioral shift in Drosophila.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Eun Jo Du

    Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Tae Jung Ahn

    Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Xianlan Wen

    Department of Physiology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Dae-Won Seo

    Department of Neurology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Duk L Na

    Department of Neurology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Jae Young Kwon

    Department of Biological Sciences, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Myunghwan Choi

    Department of Biomedical Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Hyung-Wook Kim

    College of Life Sciences, Sejong University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Hana Cho

    Department of Physiology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9394-8671
  10. KyeongJin Kang

    Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea
    For correspondence
    kangk@skku.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0446-469X

Funding

Ministry of Education (NRF-2015R1D1A1A01057288)

  • KyeongJin Kang

Ministry of Education (2015H-1A2A-1034723)

  • Tae Jung Ahn

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2016, Du et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,559
    views
  • 462
    downloads
  • 35
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Eun Jo Du
  2. Tae Jung Ahn
  3. Xianlan Wen
  4. Dae-Won Seo
  5. Duk L Na
  6. Jae Young Kwon
  7. Myunghwan Choi
  8. Hyung-Wook Kim
  9. Hana Cho
  10. KyeongJin Kang
(2016)
Nucleophile sensitivity of Drosophila TRPA1 underlies light-induced feeding deterrence
eLife 5:e18425.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.18425

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.18425

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Nico A Flierman, Sue Ann Koay ... Chris I De Zeeuw
    Research Article

    The role of cerebellum in controlling eye movements is well established, but its contribution to more complex forms of visual behavior has remained elusive. To study cerebellar activity during visual attention we recorded extracellular activity of dentate nucleus (DN) neurons in two non-human primates (NHPs). NHPs were trained to read the direction indicated by a peripheral visual stimulus while maintaining fixation at the center, and report the direction of the cue by performing a saccadic eye movement into the same direction following a delay. We found that single-unit DN neurons modulated spiking activity over the entire time course of the task, and that their activity often bridged temporally separated intra-trial events, yet in a heterogeneous manner. To better understand the heterogeneous relationship between task structure, behavioral performance, and neural dynamics, we constructed a behavioral, an encoding, and a decoding model. Both NHPs showed different behavioral strategies, which influenced the performance. Activity of the DN neurons reflected the unique strategies, with the direction of the visual stimulus frequently being encoded long before an upcoming saccade. Moreover, the latency of the ramping activity of DN neurons following presentation of the visual stimulus was shorter in the better performing NHP. Labeling with the retrograde tracer Cholera Toxin B in the recording location in the DN indicated that these neurons predominantly receive inputs from Purkinje cells in the D1 and D2 zones of the lateral cerebellum as well as neurons of the principal olive and medial pons, all regions known to connect with neurons in the prefrontal cortex contributing to planning of saccades. Together, our results highlight that DN neurons can dynamically modulate their activity during a visual attention task, comprising not only sensorimotor but also cognitive attentional components.

    1. Neuroscience
    Robert A Bruce, Matthew Weber ... Kumar Narayanan
    Research Article

    The role of striatal pathways in cognitive processing is unclear. We studied dorsomedial striatal cognitive processing during interval timing, an elementary cognitive task that requires mice to estimate intervals of several seconds and involves working memory for temporal rules as well as attention to the passage of time. We harnessed optogenetic tagging to record from striatal D2-dopamine receptor-expressing medium spiny neurons (D2-MSNs) in the indirect pathway and from D1-dopamine receptor-expressing MSNs (D1-MSNs) in the direct pathway. We found that D2-MSNs and D1-MSNs exhibited distinct dynamics over temporal intervals as quantified by principal component analyses and trial-by-trial generalized linear models. MSN recordings helped construct and constrain a four-parameter drift-diffusion computational model in which MSN ensemble activity represented the accumulation of temporal evidence. This model predicted that disrupting either D2-MSNs or D1-MSNs would increase interval timing response times and alter MSN firing. In line with this prediction, we found that optogenetic inhibition or pharmacological disruption of either D2-MSNs or D1-MSNs increased interval timing response times. Pharmacologically disrupting D2-MSNs or D1-MSNs also changed MSN dynamics and degraded trial-by-trial temporal decoding. Together, our findings demonstrate that D2-MSNs and D1-MSNs had opposing dynamics yet played complementary cognitive roles, implying that striatal direct and indirect pathways work together to shape temporal control of action. These data provide novel insight into basal ganglia cognitive operations beyond movement and have implications for human striatal diseases and therapies targeting striatal pathways.