Decoding gripping force based on local field potentials recorded from subthalamic nucleus in humans

  1. Huiling Tan  Is a corresponding author
  2. Alek Pogosyan
  3. Keyoumars Ashkan
  4. Alexander L Green
  5. Tipu Aziz
  6. Thomas Foltynie
  7. Patricia Limousin
  8. Ludvic Zrinzo
  9. Marwan Hariz
  10. Peter Brown
  1. University of Oxford, United Kingdom
  2. Kings College London, United Kingdom
  3. UCL Institute of Neurology, United Kingdom

Abstract

The basal ganglia are known to be involved in the planning, execution and control of gripping force and movement vigour. Here we aim to define the nature of the basal ganglia control signal for force and to decode gripping force based on local field potential (LFP) activities recorded from the subthalamic nucleus (STN) in patients with deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrodes. We found that STN LFP activities in the gamma (55-90 Hz) and beta (13-30 Hz) bands were most informative about gripping force, and that a first order dynamic linear model with these STN LFP features as inputs can be used to decode the temporal profile of gripping force. Our results enhance the understanding of how the basal ganglia control gripping force, and also suggest that deep brain LFPs could potentially be used to decode movement parameters related to force and movement vigour for the development of advanced human-machine interfaces.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Huiling Tan

    Nuffield Department of Clinical Neuroscience; 2. Medical Research Council Brain Network Dynamics Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    huiling.tan@ndcn.ox.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8038-3029
  2. Alek Pogosyan

    Nuffield Department of Clinical Neuroscience; 2. Medical Research Council Brain Network Dynamics Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Keyoumars Ashkan

    Department of Neurosurgery, Kings College Hospital, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Alexander L Green

    Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Tipu Aziz

    Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Thomas Foltynie

    Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience & Movement Disorders, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Patricia Limousin

    Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience & Movement Disorders, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Ludvic Zrinzo

    Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience & Movement Disorders, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Marwan Hariz

    Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience & Movement Disorders, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Peter Brown

    Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5201-3044

Funding

European Commission (FP7-ICT-610391)

  • Huiling Tan
  • Alek Pogosyan
  • Peter Brown

Medical Research Council (Unit Grant)

  • Huiling Tan
  • Alek Pogosyan
  • Peter Brown

National Institute for Health Research

  • Peter Brown

Oxford biomedical research centre

  • Peter Brown

Rosetrees Trust

  • Peter Brown

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: Informed consent and consent to publish was obtained from patients before they took part in the study, which was approved by Oxfordshire Research Ethics Committee.

Copyright

© 2016, Tan et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,953
    views
  • 470
    downloads
  • 42
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Huiling Tan
  2. Alek Pogosyan
  3. Keyoumars Ashkan
  4. Alexander L Green
  5. Tipu Aziz
  6. Thomas Foltynie
  7. Patricia Limousin
  8. Ludvic Zrinzo
  9. Marwan Hariz
  10. Peter Brown
(2016)
Decoding gripping force based on local field potentials recorded from subthalamic nucleus in humans
eLife 5:e19089.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19089

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19089

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Damian Koevoet, Laura Van Zantwijk ... Christoph Strauch
    Research Article

    What determines where to move the eyes? We recently showed that pupil size, a well-established marker of effort, also reflects the effort associated with making a saccade (‘saccade costs’). Here, we demonstrate saccade costs to critically drive saccade selection: when choosing between any two saccade directions, the least costly direction was consistently preferred. Strikingly, this principle even held during search in natural scenes in two additional experiments. When increasing cognitive demand experimentally through an auditory counting task, participants made fewer saccades and especially cut costly directions. This suggests that the eye-movement system and other cognitive operations consume similar resources that are flexibly allocated among each other as cognitive demand changes. Together, we argue that eye-movement behavior is tuned to adaptively minimize saccade-inherent effort.

    1. Neuroscience
    Yisi Liu, Pu Wang ... Hongwei Zhou
    Short Report

    The increasing use of tissue clearing techniques underscores the urgent need for cost-effective and simplified deep imaging methods. While traditional inverted confocal microscopes excel in high-resolution imaging of tissue sections and cultured cells, they face limitations in deep imaging of cleared tissues due to refractive index mismatches between the immersion media of objectives and sample container. To overcome these challenges, the RIM-Deep was developed to significantly improve deep imaging capabilities without compromising the normal function of the confocal microscope. This system facilitates deep immunofluorescence imaging of the prefrontal cortex in cleared macaque tissue, extending imaging depth from 2 mm to 5 mm. Applied to an intact and cleared Thy1-EGFP mouse brain, the system allowed for clear axonal visualization at high imaging depth. Moreover, this advancement enables large-scale, deep 3D imaging of intact tissues. In principle, this concept can be extended to any imaging modality, including existing inverted wide-field, confocal, and two-photon microscopy. This would significantly upgrade traditional laboratory configurations and facilitate the study of connectomes in the brain and other tissues.