Decoding gripping force based on local field potentials recorded from subthalamic nucleus in humans

  1. Huiling Tan  Is a corresponding author
  2. Alek Pogosyan
  3. Keyoumars Ashkan
  4. Alexander L Green
  5. Tipu Aziz
  6. Thomas Foltynie
  7. Patricia Limousin
  8. Ludvic Zrinzo
  9. Marwan Hariz
  10. Peter Brown
  1. University of Oxford, United Kingdom
  2. Kings College London, United Kingdom
  3. UCL Institute of Neurology, United Kingdom

Abstract

The basal ganglia are known to be involved in the planning, execution and control of gripping force and movement vigour. Here we aim to define the nature of the basal ganglia control signal for force and to decode gripping force based on local field potential (LFP) activities recorded from the subthalamic nucleus (STN) in patients with deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrodes. We found that STN LFP activities in the gamma (55-90 Hz) and beta (13-30 Hz) bands were most informative about gripping force, and that a first order dynamic linear model with these STN LFP features as inputs can be used to decode the temporal profile of gripping force. Our results enhance the understanding of how the basal ganglia control gripping force, and also suggest that deep brain LFPs could potentially be used to decode movement parameters related to force and movement vigour for the development of advanced human-machine interfaces.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Huiling Tan

    Nuffield Department of Clinical Neuroscience; 2. Medical Research Council Brain Network Dynamics Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    huiling.tan@ndcn.ox.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8038-3029
  2. Alek Pogosyan

    Nuffield Department of Clinical Neuroscience; 2. Medical Research Council Brain Network Dynamics Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Keyoumars Ashkan

    Department of Neurosurgery, Kings College Hospital, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Alexander L Green

    Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Tipu Aziz

    Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Thomas Foltynie

    Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience & Movement Disorders, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Patricia Limousin

    Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience & Movement Disorders, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Ludvic Zrinzo

    Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience & Movement Disorders, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Marwan Hariz

    Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience & Movement Disorders, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Peter Brown

    Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5201-3044

Funding

European Commission (FP7-ICT-610391)

  • Huiling Tan
  • Alek Pogosyan
  • Peter Brown

Medical Research Council (Unit Grant)

  • Huiling Tan
  • Alek Pogosyan
  • Peter Brown

National Institute for Health Research

  • Peter Brown

Oxford biomedical research centre

  • Peter Brown

Rosetrees Trust

  • Peter Brown

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Robert Turner

Ethics

Human subjects: Informed consent and consent to publish was obtained from patients before they took part in the study, which was approved by Oxfordshire Research Ethics Committee.

Version history

  1. Received: June 24, 2016
  2. Accepted: November 14, 2016
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: November 18, 2016 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: December 8, 2016 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2016, Tan et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,886
    views
  • 459
    downloads
  • 40
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Huiling Tan
  2. Alek Pogosyan
  3. Keyoumars Ashkan
  4. Alexander L Green
  5. Tipu Aziz
  6. Thomas Foltynie
  7. Patricia Limousin
  8. Ludvic Zrinzo
  9. Marwan Hariz
  10. Peter Brown
(2016)
Decoding gripping force based on local field potentials recorded from subthalamic nucleus in humans
eLife 5:e19089.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19089

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19089

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Qianli Yang
    Insight

    Subpopulations of neurons in the subthalamic nucleus have distinct activity patterns that relate to the three hypotheses of the Drift Diffusion Model.

    1. Neuroscience
    Jakub Onysk, Nicholas Gregory ... Flavia Mancini
    Research Article

    The placebo and nocebo effects highlight the importance of expectations in modulating pain perception, but in everyday life we don’t need an external source of information to form expectations about pain. The brain can learn to predict pain in a more fundamental way, simply by experiencing fluctuating, non-random streams of noxious inputs, and extracting their temporal regularities. This process is called statistical learning. Here, we address a key open question: does statistical learning modulate pain perception? We asked 27 participants to both rate and predict pain intensity levels in sequences of fluctuating heat pain. Using a computational approach, we show that probabilistic expectations and confidence were used to weigh pain perception and prediction. As such, this study goes beyond well-established conditioning paradigms associating non-pain cues with pain outcomes, and shows that statistical learning itself shapes pain experience. This finding opens a new path of research into the brain mechanisms of pain regulation, with relevance to chronic pain where it may be dysfunctional.