Decoding gripping force based on local field potentials recorded from subthalamic nucleus in humans

  1. Huiling Tan  Is a corresponding author
  2. Alek Pogosyan
  3. Keyoumars Ashkan
  4. Alexander L Green
  5. Tipu Aziz
  6. Thomas Foltynie
  7. Patricia Limousin
  8. Ludvic Zrinzo
  9. Marwan Hariz
  10. Peter Brown
  1. University of Oxford, United Kingdom
  2. Kings College London, United Kingdom
  3. UCL Institute of Neurology, United Kingdom

Abstract

The basal ganglia are known to be involved in the planning, execution and control of gripping force and movement vigour. Here we aim to define the nature of the basal ganglia control signal for force and to decode gripping force based on local field potential (LFP) activities recorded from the subthalamic nucleus (STN) in patients with deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrodes. We found that STN LFP activities in the gamma (55-90 Hz) and beta (13-30 Hz) bands were most informative about gripping force, and that a first order dynamic linear model with these STN LFP features as inputs can be used to decode the temporal profile of gripping force. Our results enhance the understanding of how the basal ganglia control gripping force, and also suggest that deep brain LFPs could potentially be used to decode movement parameters related to force and movement vigour for the development of advanced human-machine interfaces.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Huiling Tan

    Nuffield Department of Clinical Neuroscience; 2. Medical Research Council Brain Network Dynamics Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    huiling.tan@ndcn.ox.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8038-3029
  2. Alek Pogosyan

    Nuffield Department of Clinical Neuroscience; 2. Medical Research Council Brain Network Dynamics Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Keyoumars Ashkan

    Department of Neurosurgery, Kings College Hospital, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Alexander L Green

    Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Tipu Aziz

    Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Thomas Foltynie

    Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience & Movement Disorders, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Patricia Limousin

    Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience & Movement Disorders, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Ludvic Zrinzo

    Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience & Movement Disorders, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Marwan Hariz

    Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience & Movement Disorders, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Peter Brown

    Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5201-3044

Funding

European Commission (FP7-ICT-610391)

  • Huiling Tan
  • Alek Pogosyan
  • Peter Brown

Medical Research Council (Unit Grant)

  • Huiling Tan
  • Alek Pogosyan
  • Peter Brown

National Institute for Health Research

  • Peter Brown

Oxford biomedical research centre

  • Peter Brown

Rosetrees Trust

  • Peter Brown

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: Informed consent and consent to publish was obtained from patients before they took part in the study, which was approved by Oxfordshire Research Ethics Committee.

Copyright

© 2016, Tan et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,932
    views
  • 464
    downloads
  • 42
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Huiling Tan
  2. Alek Pogosyan
  3. Keyoumars Ashkan
  4. Alexander L Green
  5. Tipu Aziz
  6. Thomas Foltynie
  7. Patricia Limousin
  8. Ludvic Zrinzo
  9. Marwan Hariz
  10. Peter Brown
(2016)
Decoding gripping force based on local field potentials recorded from subthalamic nucleus in humans
eLife 5:e19089.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19089

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19089

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Selene Seoyun Lee, Livia Civitelli, Laura Parkkinen
    Research Article

    The alpha-synuclein (αSyn) seeding amplification assay (SAA) that allows the generation of disease-specific in vitro seeded fibrils (SAA fibrils) is used as a research tool to study the connection between the structure of αSyn fibrils, cellular seeding/spreading, and the clinicopathological manifestations of different synucleinopathies. However, structural differences between human brain-derived and SAA αSyn fibrils have been recently highlighted. Here, we characterize the biophysical properties of the human brain-derived αSyn fibrils from the brains of patients with Parkinson’s disease with and without dementia (PD, PDD), dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), multiple system atrophy (MSA), and compare them to the ‘model’ SAA fibrils. We report that the brain-derived αSyn fibrils show distinct biochemical profiles, which were not replicated in the corresponding SAA fibrils. Furthermore, the brain-derived αSyn fibrils from all synucleinopathies displayed a mixture of ‘straight’ and ‘twisted’ microscopic structures. However, the PD, PDD, and DLB SAA fibrils had a ’straight’ structure, whereas MSA SAA fibrils showed a ‘twisted’ structure. Finally, the brain-derived αSyn fibrils from all four synucleinopathies were phosphorylated (S129). Interestingly, phosphorylated αSyn were carried over to the PDD and DLB SAA fibrils. Our findings demonstrate the limitation of the SAA fibrils modeling the brain-derived αSyn fibrils and pay attention to the necessity of deepening the understanding of the SAA fibrillation methodology.

    1. Neuroscience
    Katie Morris, Edita Bulovaite ... Mathew H Horrocks
    Research Article

    The concept that dimeric protein complexes in synapses can sequentially replace their subunits has been a cornerstone of Francis Crick’s 1984 hypothesis, explaining how long-term memories could be maintained in the face of short protein lifetimes. However, it is unknown whether the subunits of protein complexes that mediate memory are sequentially replaced in the brain and if this process is linked to protein lifetime. We address these issues by focusing on supercomplexes assembled by the abundant postsynaptic scaffolding protein PSD95, which plays a crucial role in memory. We used single-molecule detection, super-resolution microscopy and MINFLUX to probe the molecular composition of PSD95 supercomplexes in mice carrying genetically encoded HaloTags, eGFP, and mEoS2. We found a population of PSD95-containing supercomplexes comprised of two copies of PSD95, with a dominant 12.7 nm separation. Time-stamping of PSD95 subunits in vivo revealed that each PSD95 subunit was sequentially replaced over days and weeks. Comparison of brain regions showed subunit replacement was slowest in the cortex, where PSD95 protein lifetime is longest. Our findings reveal that protein supercomplexes within the postsynaptic density can be maintained by gradual replacement of individual subunits providing a mechanism for stable maintenance of their organization. Moreover, we extend Crick’s model by suggesting that synapses with slow subunit replacement of protein supercomplexes and long-protein lifetimes are specialized for long-term memory storage and that these synapses are highly enriched in superficial layers of the cortex where long-term memories are stored.