Recruitment of inhibition and excitation across mouse visual cortex depends on the hierarchy of interconnecting areas

  1. Rinaldo David D'Souza  Is a corresponding author
  2. Andrew Max Meier
  3. Pawan Bista
  4. Quanxin Wang
  5. Andreas Burkhalter  Is a corresponding author
  1. Washington University School of Medicine, United States
  2. Allen Institute for Brain Science, United States

Decision letter

  1. Sacha B Nelson
    Reviewing Editor; Brandeis University, United States

In the interests of transparency, eLife includes the editorial decision letter and accompanying author responses. A lightly edited version of the letter sent to the authors after peer review is shown, indicating the most substantive concerns; minor comments are not usually included.

Thank you for submitting your article "Pathway-specific recruitment of inhibition and excitation across the counterstream mouse visual cortical network" for consideration by eLife. Your article has been favorably evaluated by Andrew King as the Senior Editor and three reviewers: Sandra Kuhlman (Reviewer #2); Ed Callaway (Reviewer #3), and Sacha B Nelson who is a member of our Board of Reviewing Editors.

The reviewers have discussed the reviews with one another and the Reviewing Editor has drafted this decision to help you prepare a revised submission.

Summary:

This is an interesting and important paper that explores anatomical and functional differences that help to both define and characterize feedforward (FF) versus feedback (FB) corticortical systems in the mouse visual cortex. How the relative recruitment of inhibitory and excitatory neurons is distributed across the visual hierarchy, both in terms of feedforward and top-down feedback is of great importance for constraining models of visual function.

Essential revisions:

1) One of the reviewers was concerned by the absence of normalized input plots for FB connections to L5 neurons. Did this imply technical concerns with these data? If so, these should be discussed. If there are no such concerns it would probably be better to include the plots in Figure 7 to allow comparison with other figures.

2) The reviewers felt that it was important to modify the Discussion to acknowledge the caveat of other sources of inhibition not studied by focusing on parvalbumin positive interneurons.

3) The reviewers felt that the observation of delayed spiking following activation of interneurons added little. If indeed the authors would like to conclude that interareal connections for FFI form local subnetworks, more direct evidence such as anatomical connectivity, is required.

4) Revision of the title – the title is jargony and should be revised.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19332.017

Author response

Essential revisions:

1) One of the reviewers was concerned by the absence of normalized input plots for FB connections to L5 neurons. Did this imply technical concerns with these data? If so, these should be discussed. If there are no such concerns it would probably be better to include the plots in Figure 7 to allow comparison with other figures.

We have now included the normalized input plots of FB L5 neurons in the new Figure 6G.

2) The reviewers felt that it was important to modify the Discussion to acknowledge the caveat of other sources of inhibition not studied by focusing on parvalbumin positive interneurons.

We agree with the reviewers’ comments and have revised the Discussion (last paragraph) by adding text describing the possible contribution of other types of interneurons in the scaling of excitation.

3) The reviewers felt that the observation of delayed spiking following activation of interneurons added little. If indeed the authors would like to conclude that interareal connections for FFI form local subnetworks, more direct evidence such as anatomical connectivity, is required.

We consider the data in question (old supplementary Figure 4G-I) not an essential part of the story and have therefore decided to eliminate them from the revised manuscript.

4) Revision of the title – the title is jargony and should be revised.

We agree that the old title was geared toward a highly specialized audience. We have therefore replaced the old title which now reads: “Recruitment of inhibition and excitation across mouse visual cortex depends on the hierarchy of interconnected areas”.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19332.018

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Rinaldo David D'Souza
  2. Andrew Max Meier
  3. Pawan Bista
  4. Quanxin Wang
  5. Andreas Burkhalter
(2016)
Recruitment of inhibition and excitation across mouse visual cortex depends on the hierarchy of interconnecting areas
eLife 5:e19332.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19332

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19332