Electrostatic anchoring precedes stable membrane attachment of SNAP25/SNAP23 to the plasma membrane

  1. Pascal Weber
  2. Helena Batoulis
  3. Kerstin Rink
  4. Stefan Dahlhoff
  5. Kerstin Pinkwart
  6. Thomas Söllner
  7. Thorsten Lang  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Bonn, Germany
  2. Heidelberg University Biochemistry Center, Germany

Abstract

The SNAREs SNAP25 and SNAP23 are proteins that are cytosolic after translation, but then become stably attached to the cell membrane through palmitoylation of cysteine residues. For palmitoylation to occur, membrane association is a prerequisite, but it is unclear which motif may increase the affinities of the proteins to the target membrane. In experiments with rat neuroendocrine cells, we find that a few polybasic amino acids in the cysteine rich region are essential for plasma membrane targeting. Reconstitution of membrane-protein binding in a liposome assay shows that the mechanism involves protein electrostatics between polybasic amino acid residues and anionic lipids like phosphoinositides that play a primary role in these interactions. Hence, we identify an electrostatic anchoring mechanism underlying initial contact establishment of SNARE proteins which then subsequently become palmitoylated at the plasma membrane.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Pascal Weber

    Membrane Biochemistry, Life and Medical Sciences Institute, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Helena Batoulis

    Membrane Biochemistry, Life and Medical Sciences Institute, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Kerstin Rink

    Heidelberg University Biochemistry Center, Heidelberg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Stefan Dahlhoff

    Membrane Biochemistry, Life and Medical Sciences Institute, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Kerstin Pinkwart

    Heidelberg University Biochemistry Center, Bonn, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Thomas Söllner

    Heidelberg University Biochemistry Center, Heidelberg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Thorsten Lang

    Membrane Biochemistry, Life and Medical Sciences Institute, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
    For correspondence
    thorsten.lang@uni-bonn.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9128-0137

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (TRR83)

  • Thomas Söllner

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (TRR83)

  • Thorsten Lang

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Axel T Brunger, Stanford University Medical Center, United States

Version history

  1. Received: July 5, 2016
  2. Accepted: February 26, 2017
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: February 27, 2017 (version 1)
  4. Accepted Manuscript updated: February 28, 2017 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record published: March 22, 2017 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2017, Weber et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,307
    views
  • 511
    downloads
  • 20
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Pascal Weber
  2. Helena Batoulis
  3. Kerstin Rink
  4. Stefan Dahlhoff
  5. Kerstin Pinkwart
  6. Thomas Söllner
  7. Thorsten Lang
(2017)
Electrostatic anchoring precedes stable membrane attachment of SNAP25/SNAP23 to the plasma membrane
eLife 6:e19394.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19394

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19394

Further reading

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Marco van den Noort, Panagiotis Drougkas ... Bert Poolman
    Research Article

    Bacteria utilize various strategies to prevent internal dehydration during hypertonic stress. A common approach to countering the effects of the stress is to import compatible solutes such as glycine betaine, leading to simultaneous passive water fluxes following the osmotic gradient. OpuA from Lactococcus lactis is a type I ABC-importer that uses two substrate-binding domains (SBDs) to capture extracellular glycine betaine and deliver the substrate to the transmembrane domains for subsequent transport. OpuA senses osmotic stress via changes in the internal ionic strength and is furthermore regulated by the 2nd messenger cyclic-di-AMP. We now show, by means of solution-based single-molecule FRET and analysis with multi-parameter photon-by-photon hidden Markov modeling, that the SBDs transiently interact in an ionic strength-dependent manner. The smFRET data are in accordance with the apparent cooperativity in transport and supported by new cryo-EM data of OpuA. We propose that the physical interactions between SBDs and cooperativity in substrate delivery are part of the transport mechanism.

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Xiao-Ru Chen, Karuna Dixit ... Tatyana I Igumenova
    Research Article

    Regulated hydrolysis of the phosphoinositide phosphatidylinositol(4,5)-bis-phosphate to diacylglycerol and inositol-1,4,5-P3 defines a major eukaryotic pathway for translation of extracellular cues to intracellular signaling circuits. Members of the lipid-activated protein kinase C isoenzyme family (PKCs) play central roles in this signaling circuit. One of the regulatory mechanisms employed to downregulate stimulated PKC activity is via a proteasome-dependent degradation pathway that is potentiated by peptidyl-prolyl isomerase Pin1. Here, we show that contrary to prevailing models, Pin1 does not regulate conventional PKC isoforms α and βII via a canonical cis-trans isomerization of the peptidyl-prolyl bond. Rather, Pin1 acts as a PKC binding partner that controls PKC activity via sequestration of the C-terminal tail of the kinase. The high-resolution structure of full-length Pin1 complexed to the C-terminal tail of PKCβII reveals that a novel bivalent interaction mode underlies the non-catalytic mode of Pin1 action. Specifically, Pin1 adopts a conformation in which it uses the WW and PPIase domains to engage two conserved phosphorylated PKC motifs, the turn motif and hydrophobic motif, respectively. Hydrophobic motif is a non-canonical Pin1-interacting element. The structural information combined with the results of extensive binding studies and experiments in cultured cells suggest that non-catalytic mechanisms represent unappreciated modes of Pin1-mediated regulation of AGC kinases and other key enzymes/substrates.