The heritability of multi-modal connectivity in human brain activity

  1. Giles L Colclough  Is a corresponding author
  2. Stephen M Smith
  3. Tom E Nichols
  4. Anderson M Winkler
  5. Stamatios N Sotiropoulos
  6. Matthew F Glasser
  7. David C Van Essen
  8. Mark W Woolrich
  1. University of Oxford, United Kingdom
  2. University of Warwick, United Kingdom
  3. Washington University, United States
  4. Washington University in St Louis, United States

Abstract

Patterns of intrinsic human brain activity exhibit a profile of functional connectivity that is associated with behaviour and cognitive performance, and deteriorates with disease. This paper investigates the relative importance of genetic factors and the common environment between twins in determining this functional connectivity profile. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) on 820 subjects from the Human Connectome Project, and magnetoencephalographic (MEG) recordings from a subset, the heritability of connectivity between 39 cortical regions was estimated. On average over all connections, genes account for about 15% of the observed variance in fMRI connectivity (and about 10% in alpha-band and 20% in beta-band oscillatory power synchronisation), which substantially exceeds the contribution from the environment shared between twins. Therefore, insofar as twins share a common upbringing, it appears that genes, rather than the developmental environment, play a dominant role in determining the coupling of neuronal activity.

Data availability

The following previously published data sets were used
    1. Van Essen DC et al.
    (2013) The Human Connectome Project HCP500 data release
    Open access dataset available from ConnectomeDB (https://db.humanconnectome.org/app/template/Login.vm). Account registration is required and access to certain data elements such as family structure is subject to restricted use terms (please see http://www.humanconnectome.org/study/hcp-young-adult/data-use-terms).
    1. Larson-Prior LJ
    (2013) The Human Connectome Project MEG2 data release
    Open access dataset available from ConnectomeDB (https://db.humanconnectome.org/app/template/Login.vm). Account registration is required and access to certain data elements such as family structure is subject to restricted use terms (please see http://www.humanconnectome.org/study/hcp-young-adult/data-use-terms).

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Giles L Colclough

    Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    giles.colclough@ohba.ox.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1074-7186
  2. Stephen M Smith

    Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Tom E Nichols

    Department of Statistics and WMG, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Anderson M Winkler

    Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Stamatios N Sotiropoulos

    Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Matthew F Glasser

    School of Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. David C Van Essen

    School of Medicine, Washington University in St Louis, St. Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    David C Van Essen, Senior editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7044-4721
  8. Mark W Woolrich

    Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

Funding

Research Councils UK (Digital Economy Programme (EP/G036861/1,Centre for Doctoral Training in Healthcare Innovation))

  • Giles L Colclough

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq,211534/2013-7)

  • Anderson M Winkler

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/L023067)

  • Stamatios N Sotiropoulos

National Institutes of Health (R01EB015611-01; NRSA fellowship (F30-MH097312); 1U54MH091657)

  • Tom E Nichols
  • Matthew F Glasser
  • David C Van Essen

National Institute for Health Research (NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre)

  • Mark W Woolrich

Medical Research Council (MRC UK MEG Partnership Grant (MR/K005464/1))

  • Giles L Colclough
  • Mark W Woolrich

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Jack L Gallant, University of California, Berkeley, United States

Ethics

Human subjects: HCP data were acquired using protocols approved by the Washington University institutional review board. Informedconsent was obtained from subjects. Anonymised data are publicly available from ConnectomeDB (db.humanconnectome.org; Hodge et al. (2016)). Certain parts of the dataset used in this study, such as the family structures of the subjects, are available subject to restricted data usage terms, requiring researchers to ensure that the anonymity of subjects is protected (Van Essen et al., 2013).

Version history

  1. Received: August 3, 2016
  2. Accepted: July 13, 2017
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: July 26, 2017 (version 1)
  4. Accepted Manuscript updated: August 1, 2017 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record published: September 29, 2017 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2017, Colclough et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,072
    views
  • 622
    downloads
  • 84
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Giles L Colclough
  2. Stephen M Smith
  3. Tom E Nichols
  4. Anderson M Winkler
  5. Stamatios N Sotiropoulos
  6. Matthew F Glasser
  7. David C Van Essen
  8. Mark W Woolrich
(2017)
The heritability of multi-modal connectivity in human brain activity
eLife 6:e20178.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20178

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20178

Further reading

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    2. Neuroscience
    Bohan Zhu, Richard I Ainsworth ... Javier González-Maeso
    Research Article

    Genome-wide association studies have revealed >270 loci associated with schizophrenia risk, yet these genetic factors do not seem to be sufficient to fully explain the molecular determinants behind this psychiatric condition. Epigenetic marks such as post-translational histone modifications remain largely plastic during development and adulthood, allowing a dynamic impact of environmental factors, including antipsychotic medications, on access to genes and regulatory elements. However, few studies so far have profiled cell-specific genome-wide histone modifications in postmortem brain samples from schizophrenia subjects, or the effect of antipsychotic treatment on such epigenetic marks. Here, we conducted ChIP-seq analyses focusing on histone marks indicative of active enhancers (H3K27ac) and active promoters (H3K4me3), alongside RNA-seq, using frontal cortex samples from antipsychotic-free (AF) and antipsychotic-treated (AT) individuals with schizophrenia, as well as individually matched controls (n=58). Schizophrenia subjects exhibited thousands of neuronal and non-neuronal epigenetic differences at regions that included several susceptibility genetic loci, such as NRG1, DISC1, and DRD3. By analyzing the AF and AT cohorts separately, we identified schizophrenia-associated alterations in specific transcription factors, their regulatees, and epigenomic and transcriptomic features that were reversed by antipsychotic treatment; as well as those that represented a consequence of antipsychotic medication rather than a hallmark of schizophrenia in postmortem human brain samples. Notably, we also found that the effect of age on epigenomic landscapes was more pronounced in frontal cortex of AT-schizophrenics, as compared to AF-schizophrenics and controls. Together, these data provide important evidence of epigenetic alterations in the frontal cortex of individuals with schizophrenia, and remark for the first time on the impact of age and antipsychotic treatment on chromatin organization.

    1. Neuroscience
    Aedan Yue Li, Natalia Ladyka-Wojcik ... Morgan Barense
    Research Article

    Combining information from multiple senses is essential to object recognition, core to the ability to learn concepts, make new inferences, and generalize across distinct entities. Yet how the mind combines sensory input into coherent crossmodal representations - the crossmodal binding problem - remains poorly understood. Here, we applied multi-echo fMRI across a four-day paradigm, in which participants learned 3-dimensional crossmodal representations created from well-characterized unimodal visual shape and sound features. Our novel paradigm decoupled the learned crossmodal object representations from their baseline unimodal shapes and sounds, thus allowing us to track the emergence of crossmodal object representations as they were learned by healthy adults. Critically, we found that two anterior temporal lobe structures - temporal pole and perirhinal cortex - differentiated learned from non-learned crossmodal objects, even when controlling for the unimodal features that composed those objects. These results provide evidence for integrated crossmodal object representations in the anterior temporal lobes that were different from the representations for the unimodal features. Furthermore, we found that perirhinal cortex representations were by default biased towards visual shape, but this initial visual bias was attenuated by crossmodal learning. Thus, crossmodal learning transformed perirhinal representations such that they were no longer predominantly grounded in the visual modality, which may be a mechanism by which object concepts gain their abstraction.