BRAFV600E cooperates with CDX2 inactivation to promote serrated colorectal tumorigenesis

Abstract

While 20-30% of colorectal cancers (CRCs) may arise from precursors with serrated glands, only 8-10% of CRCs manifest serrated morphology at diagnosis. Markers for distinguishing CRCs arising from 'serrated' versus 'conventional adenoma' precursors are lacking. We studied 36 human serrated CRCs and found CDX2 loss or BRAF mutations in ~60% of cases and often together (p= .04). CDX2Null/BRAFV600E expression in adult mouse intestinal epithelium led to serrated morphology tumors (including carcinomas) and BRAFV600E potently interacted with CDX2 silencing to alter gene expression. Like human serrated lesions, CDX2Null/BRAFV600E-mutant epithelium expressed gastric markers. Organoids from CDX2Null/BRAFV600E-mutant colon epithelium showed serrated features, and partially recapitulated the gene expression pattern in mouse colon tissues. We present a novel mouse tumor model based on signature defects seen in many human serrated CRCs - CDX2 loss and BRAFV600E. The mouse intestinal tumors show significant phenotypic similarities to human serrated CRCs and inform about serrated CRC pathogenesis.

Data availability

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Naoya Sakamoto

    Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Ying Feng

    Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Carmine Stolfi

    Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Yuki Kurosu

    Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Maranne Green

    Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Jeffry Lin

    Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Megan Green

    Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Kazuhiro Sentani

    Department of Molecular Pathology, Hiroshima University, Hirosima, Japan
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Wataru Yasui

    Department of Molecular Pathology, Hiroshima University, Hirosima, Japan
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Martin McMahon

    Department of Dermatology, University of Utah Medical Schoo, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    Martin McMahon, Reviewing editor, eLife.
  11. Karin M Hardiman

    Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Jason R Spence

    Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7869-3992
  13. Nobukatsu Horita

    Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  14. Joel K Greenson

    Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  15. Rork Kuick

    Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  16. Kathy R Cho

    Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  17. Eric R Fearon

    Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    For correspondence
    fearon@umich.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2867-3971

Funding

National Institutes of Health (R01CA082223)

  • Eric R Fearon

National Institutes of Health (R01CA176839)

  • Martin McMahon

National Institutes of Health (P30CA046592)

  • Eric R Fearon

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Procedures involving mice for the research described herein have been approved by the University of Michigan's Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (PRO00005075) and were carried out according to Michigan state and US federal regulations.

Human subjects: The colorectal cancers were studied in accordance with the Ethical Guidelines for Human Genome/Gene Research enacted by the Japanese Government. We also studied human benign serrated colorectal lesions obtained from the University of Michigan tissue procurement service through an Institutional Review Board-approved protocol (#00058054).

Copyright

© 2017, Sakamoto et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,611
    views
  • 794
    downloads
  • 75
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Naoya Sakamoto
  2. Ying Feng
  3. Carmine Stolfi
  4. Yuki Kurosu
  5. Maranne Green
  6. Jeffry Lin
  7. Megan Green
  8. Kazuhiro Sentani
  9. Wataru Yasui
  10. Martin McMahon
  11. Karin M Hardiman
  12. Jason R Spence
  13. Nobukatsu Horita
  14. Joel K Greenson
  15. Rork Kuick
  16. Kathy R Cho
  17. Eric R Fearon
(2017)
BRAFV600E cooperates with CDX2 inactivation to promote serrated colorectal tumorigenesis
eLife 6:e20331.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20331

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20331

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Evolutionary Biology
    Arman Angaji, Michel Owusu ... Johannes Berg
    Research Article

    In growing cell populations such as tumours, mutations can serve as markers that allow tracking the past evolution from current samples. The genomic analyses of bulk samples and samples from multiple regions have shed light on the evolutionary forces acting on tumours. However, little is known empirically on the spatio-temporal dynamics of tumour evolution. Here, we leverage published data from resected hepatocellular carcinomas, each with several hundred samples taken in two and three dimensions. Using spatial metrics of evolution, we find that tumour cells grow predominantly uniformly within the tumour volume instead of at the surface. We determine how mutations and cells are dispersed throughout the tumour and how cell death contributes to the overall tumour growth. Our methods shed light on the early evolution of tumours in vivo and can be applied to high-resolution data in the emerging field of spatial biology.

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Evolutionary Biology
    Susanne Tilk, Judith Frydman ... Dmitri A Petrov
    Research Article

    In asexual populations that don’t undergo recombination, such as cancer, deleterious mutations are expected to accrue readily due to genome-wide linkage between mutations. Despite this mutational load of often thousands of deleterious mutations, many tumors thrive. How tumors survive the damaging consequences of this mutational load is not well understood. Here, we investigate the functional consequences of mutational load in 10,295 human tumors by quantifying their phenotypic response through changes in gene expression. Using a generalized linear mixed model (GLMM), we find that high mutational load tumors up-regulate proteostasis machinery related to the mitigation and prevention of protein misfolding. We replicate these expression responses in cancer cell lines and show that the viability in high mutational load cancer cells is strongly dependent on complexes that degrade and refold proteins. This indicates that the upregulation of proteostasis machinery is causally important for high mutational burden tumors and uncovers new therapeutic vulnerabilities.