Toxic chemicals, extreme temperatures and other abnormal environmental conditions can cause the cells in our bodies to become stressed. Several kinds of stresses overwhelm a compartment in the cell called the endoplasmic reticulum, which is critical for processing new proteins so that they can work correctly. Endoplasmic reticulum stress has been linked to long-term diseases such as diabetes, cancer and neurodegenerative diseases.

Most of what is known about how cells sense and respond to endoplasmic reticulum stress comes from studies on isolated cells that were subjected to harsh conditions that cells cannot tolerate for longer than a day or two. By contrast, little is known about how cells within whole organisms respond to milder but longer-lasting endoplasmic reticulum stress, which is closer to what occurs during disease.

To investigate this issue, Gomez and Rutkowski treated mice repeatedly with a chemical that causes mild endoplasmic reticulum stress in the liver. The cells exposed to this persistent stress responded differently to those exposed to severe short-term stress. Whereas short-term stress causes liver cells to turn on genes that help the endoplasmic reticulum to process proteins more efficiently, long-term stress causes cells to turn off some of those genes.

Further investigation revealed that cells in the livers of obese mice show similar patterns of gene activity as cells exposed to long-term endoplasmic reticulum stress. The findings presented by Gomez and Rutkowski could therefore also help us to understand more about the liver problems that often occur during obesity and diabetes.

Further studies are now needed to examine exactly how long-lasting stress can shut off the cells’ protective mechanisms. Future experiments could also investigate whether other types of cells and organs respond to long-term endoplasmic reticulum stress in the same way as cells in the liver.

The western obesity epidemic has exposed one of the consequences of modernity: the increasing prevalence of non-infectious chronic diseases that progress down increasingly irreversible paths over the course of years to decades. Diabetes, atherosclerosis, hypertension, steatohepatitis, and the like join neurodegenerative disorders, cancers, lung disease and other chronic diseases in driving morbidity and mortality in the western world (Ezzati et al., 2002). As a class, these diseases necessarily entail a gradual deterioration of cellular and organ function, rather than an acute collapse. Thus, treating or reversing them requires understanding how persistent but otherwise modest stimuli alter the activity of key cellular pathways.

One cellular pathway increasingly implicated in the progression of a number of chronic diseases is the Unfolded Protein Response (UPR). The UPR is activated by disruption of the protein folding capacity of the endoplasmic reticulum, otherwise known as ‘ER stress’ (Walter and Ron, 2011). Unremitted ER stress and/or a dysregulated UPR appear to contribute to hepatic steatosis and steatohepatitis (Malhi and Kaufman, 2011), atherosclerosis (Zhou and Tabas, 2013), colitis and inflammatory bowel disease (Kaser et al., 2013), hypertension (Young and Davisson, 2015), and many others. As an organelle that carries out several essential cellular processes (protein processing, calcium storage, lipogenesis, certain metabolic steps, etc.) and that is physically and functionally intertwined with many other critical cellular pathways, the ER is sensitive to a range of diverse stimuli. For example, ER stress is observed in the livers of obese mice (Ozcan et al., 2004), and this response has been attributed to an excess load of nascent client proteins in the organelle due to nutrient-mediated stimulation of mTOR activity (Ozcan et al., 2008). Other physiological stimuli that elicit ER stress include nutritional status and the activity of metabolic pathways (Oyadomari et al., 2008; Tyra et al., 2012; Shao et al., 2014), differentiation cues (Iwakoshi et al., 2003; van Anken et al., 2003; Lee et al., 2005), inflammatory signals (Zhang et al., 2006; Hotamisligil, 2010), and many others. While the UPR is capable of responding to excessive ER stress by initiating cell death cascades (Sano and Reed, 2013), chronic stress is instead likely to result not in cell death (at least not for most cells, most of the time), but instead in a persistent burden on ER function that must be accommodated by the UPR. And yet, for many chronic diseases in which ER stress is implicated, it is not clear whether disease results from a UPR that becomes progressively dysregulated and thus responds inappropriately; or whether the UPR becomes progressively neutered and simply becomes increasingly unresponsive.

Experimental manipulation of the UPR has sketched the framework of a canonical UPR that is initiated by three ER-resident proteins and that culminates in transcriptional augmentation of the ER protein processing capacity and other non-transcriptional mechanisms to alleviate ER load. The inositol-requiring enzyme 1α (IRE1α) pathway results in both the production of the XBP1 transcription factor (Yoshida et al., 2001; Calfon et al., 2002; Lee et al., 2002) and the degradation of ER-associated mRNAs in a process known as Regulated IRE1-Dependent Decay via the IRE1 endonuclease activity (Hollien and Weissman, 2006; Hollien et al., 2009). The PKR-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK) stimulates production of the ATF4 transcription factor (Harding et al., 2000) and also transiently reduces ER protein load by phosphorylation of the translation initiation factor eIF2α (Shi et al., 1998; Harding et al., 1999). ATF6 (comprising both α and β paralogs) initiates the third pathway when ATF6 is itself cleaved by regulated intramembrane proteolysis in the Golgi, liberating a transcriptionally active N-terminal fragment (Ye et al., 2000). These pathways are all robustly activated by acute exposure of cells to high doses of ER stress-inducing drugs, which is an effective tool for understanding what the system is capable of but not as effective for understanding how the cellular response to chronic stress differs from these canonical pathways.

Evidence for the involvement of ER stress in chronic diseases in general comes from two lines of investigation: detecting markers of ER stress in the affected tissues of human patients or mouse models thereof, and observing disease-like phenotypes in mice with genetic ablations of UPR signaling pathways. Yet while studies of this sort provide prima facie evidence for UPR involvement, they do not address how the UPR becomes dysregulated during chronic disease, if in fact it even does. Further, animal models of chronic diseases such as those associated with obesity tend to influence innumerable cellular pathways and make it difficult to isolate the effects of ER stress per se from the many other confounding factors.

With these considerations in mind, we set out to address how the UPR responds to chronic stress in vivo. Following the example of our previous work in vitro (Rutkowski et al., 2006), here we describe how UPR signaling in the liver becomes altered during repeated exposure to stress, the mechanisms by which these alterations occur, and their potential relevance to liver dysfunction during obesity.

In this paper, we have described the first, to our knowledge, experimental reconstitution of chronic, tractable ER stress in a mammal in vivo. This work builds upon previous efforts to recreate chronic ER stress in fish larvae (Cinaroglu et al., 2011), and to elicit chronic ER stress in mammals by overexpression of misfolded ER client proteins or deletion of ER chaperones (e.g., [Ji et al., 2011; Zode et al., 2011; Kawasaki et al., 2015]). We have used this system as a tool to probe how UPR signaling becomes altered during persistent and/or repeated activation. Our investigation has several novel implications for the mechanisms of UPR signaling.

The data presented here lead us to propose a working model to account for the altered expression of Hspa5 (Bip) and other UPR transcriptional targets during chronic stress (Figure 7). In the basal (i.e., nominally ‘unstressed’) state, activation of ATF6α contributes to the expression of Hspa5 mRNA. We arrive at this conclusion because expression of Hspa5 was diminished in the absence of ATF6α even without an exogenous stress (Figure 3D). This finding implies that normal physiological function in the liver entails periods of UPR activation—perhaps not surprisingly, given that feeding itself activates the UPR (Figure 6A). BiP is one of the most abundant proteins in the ER lumen (Gething, 1999), and other non-stress-dependent mechanisms contribute to its basal regulation as well (Resendez et al., 1988). Upon exposure to a conventional ER stress, all three limbs of the UPR are activated (Rutkowski et al., 2006), leading to robust production of stress-specific target transcripts such as Ddit3 (Chop), as well as augmentation of transcripts encoding ER chaperones, such as Hspa5 and Hsp90b1 (Grp94). The attendant improvement of ER protein folding then presents a problem for the cell: how to avoid overproduction of UPR targets. As the UPR stress-sensing molecules become deactivated, naturally labile factors such as CHOP (both mRNA and protein) are readily lost (Rutkowski et al., 2006). However, ER chaperones such as BiP and GRP94 are long-lived at both the protein and mRNA levels (Rutkowski et al., 2006), and continued overproduction of these proteins would presumably greatly tax cellular resources and potentially constitute their own burden on the organelle. Thus, BiP overexpression appears to initiate a negative feedback loop, both suppressing UPR activity (including the basal activity of ATF6α) and also indirectly stimulating the degradation of its own mRNA. In the context of incidental exposure to stress, or of the low-level stresses that occur during normal physiological function, we presume that this depression of Hspa5 mRNA levels is transient. However, during repeated stress, we propose that it constitutes a resetting to a new quasi-stable setpoint for UPR transcriptional regulation.

Figure 7

Download asset Open asset

One of the founding observations of the UPR field was that activation of the ER stress sensing molecules required their dissociation from BiP in both yeast and mammals (Bertolotti et al., 2000; Shen et al., 2002). Originally, the purpose attributed to BiP binding was to hold the stress sensors in a quiescent state and so to play a role in UPR activation. However, the suggestion that at least yeast Ire1p can be activated by direct binding to unfolded proteins (Kimata et al., 2004; Gardner and Walter, 2011; Gardner et al., 2013) has cast doubt on this model. Our data raise the possibility that perhaps the role of BiP binding is to instead modulate UPR deactivation.

The objective of this work from the outset was to develop an experimental system for eliciting chronic ER stress specifically, in order to be able to determine how the regulation and output of the response changed under such conditions and so identify fingerprints of chronic ER stress associated with disease states. An important caveat is that most agents other than TM that specifically induce ER stress in vitro fail to do so easily or effectively in vivo. While relatively specific in inducing ER stress due to its blockage of N-linked glycosylation, TM also is capable of disrupting carbohydrate metabolism (Olden et al., 1979) and protein palmitoylation (Patterson and Skene, 1995), although whether it does so at the doses used here is unclear. In addition, it is conceivable that the chronic stress phenotype is caused not by the ER stress-inducing effect of TM, but by underglycosylation of some specific key protein. However, we do not favor this alternative explanation in part because the degree of protein underglycosylation under these conditions is relatively modest (e.g., Figure 1E), and also because of the ability of BiP overexpression to phenocopy Hspa5 downregulation (Figure 5).

In addition, the strikingly similar phenotype in Lep^ob/ob and Lepr^db/db mice vouches for this approach. One difference between the chronic condition on one hand and the steady-state in obese mice on the other is that the latter do not appear to express elevated BiP protein levels (not shown), which at face value seems at odds with the idea that elevated BiP protein is needed to both suppress ATF6α and activate or perpetuate RIDD. However, as we have demonstrated, the magnitude of ER stress elicited by feeding is considerably lower than that elicited by tunicamycin (Figure 6; also compare Figure 6A with Figure 4D), yet also much more repetitive than the once-daily TM challenge. It is plausible that the less robust but more constant stimulus of overfeeding results in modest alterations in expression of BiP protein that have little effect on Hspa5 mRNA over the course of meals or days but great effect over the course of months—essentially that small increases in BiP protein levels could produce small decreases in BiP mRNA expression that accumulate over time. It is possible that further moderating the dose of TM and lengthening its extent (from days to weeks/months) would more closely mimic the phenotype observed in obese animals, although this would be experimentally cumbersome. It is also worth noting that the suppression of Hspa5 and Hsp90b1 mRNAs might be achieved by other mechanisms that suppress ATF6α activation while perpetuating RIDD. For instance, it has been reported that ATF6α expression is lost in obese animals (Wang et al., 2009). Along these lines, we observed that Atf6 mRNA is also significantly downregulated by chronic stress, albeit not as robustly as Hspa5 (not shown), raising the possibility of a positive feedback loop for suppressing Hspa5 expression even as BiP protein levels subside. Alternatively, posttranslational modifications that alter BiP’s interactions with its binding partners (Chambers et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2014; Preissler et al., 2015) might also play a role. Ultimately, the clearest way to test whether the mechanism we describe here is at work in obese animals might be to intercross these animals with Atf6-/- animals; as when given repeated TM injections, these animals should have basally suppressed Hspa5 mRNA expression even at an early age, but then there should be no further suppression as the animals age and become obese. Even if the mechanism turns out to be entirely distinct, the description here of suppressed expression of Hspa5, and Hsp90b1 and potentially elevated RIDD activity in these animals has potential implications for their ability to maintain ongoing ER homeostasis. It is conceivable that an altered UPR ‘setpoint’ with reduced expression of Hspa5 and other UPR mRNA targets could render the animals more sensitive to ER stress-induced cell death and exacerbate the hepatic inflammation associated with obesity (Gregor and Hotamisligil, 2011).

A surprising conclusion from this work is that RIDD might remain active in the chronic condition, even as UPR-dependent transcriptional signaling is shut off. Admittedly, conclusively demonstrating RIDD activity in vivo is challenging; here we have relied on repression of the well-documented RIDD target Bloc1s1 as the primary readout for RIDD activity. Bloc1s1 expression was repressed in the chronic condition (Figure 4G), upon BiP overexpression (Figure 5D), and in Lepr^db/db animals (Figure 6E). Phos-tag immunoblotting showed substantial phosphorylation of IRE1α only in animals treated with a high acute dose of TM, and antibodies purported to be specific for phospho-IRE1 did not produce bands that were absent in cells lacking IRE1α in control experiments (not shown). These limitations made it impossible to directly test whether IRE1α remained phosphorylated in the chronic condition. In addition, there is as yet no functional assay for confirming that RIDD is active in vivo. Rather, substrates are generally identified as putative RIDD targets based on an in vitro assay using purified IRE1α (Hollien and Weissman, 2006; Hollien et al., 2009). Then, their RIDD dependence is confirmed by their suppression during ER stress in an IRE1α-dependent XBP1-independent manner. However, Hspa5 and Hsp90b1 are both also transcriptionally upregulated by XBP1 (Lee et al., 2003), which would likely confound analysis of their regulation in animals lacking IRE1α. In any case, our data hint at a previously unappreciated role for RIDD, which has generally been considered an anti-adaptive signaling mechanism to this point (Han et al., 2009; Lerner et al., 2012; Upton et al., 2012; Maurel et al., 2014). The purpose of the clearance of ER-resident proteins might not so much be to neuter the organelle and hasten its dysfunction during severe stress (Maurel et al., 2014) as to help turn the response off once stress has been overcome. If RIDD is indeed active under these conditions, such a role could help explain the previously puzzling finding that Hspa5 is a potential RIDD target (Han et al., 2009).

Assuming RIDD is active during chronic stress, our data provide further evidence that the Xbp1 splicing and RIDD activities of IRE1α can be dissociated (Lin et al., 2007; Han et al., 2008). They raise the possibility that this dissociation occurs not necessarily to separate adaptive from apoptotic outputs so much as to separate activation from deactivation. Given that most stresses encountered by most cells most of the time are likely to be mild and transient—such as that encountered by feeding—the death-accelerating function of RIDD might simply be a byproduct of a normal physiological role in restoring the UPR rheostat. Indeed, a parallel can be drawn with the UPR-regulated transcription factor CHOP which, though it clearly promotes cell death during severe stress (Zinszner et al., 1998) also might promote normal cellular function during milder stress both by potentiating the dephosphorylation of eIF2α (Marciniak et al., 2004) and by regulating lipid metabolism (Tyra et al., 2012; Chikka et al., 2013) toward the ultimate improvement of ER function.

The approach we took to experimentally reconstituting chronic ER stress in vivo was conceptually analogous to our earlier reconstitution of chronic stress in vitro in MEFs (Rutkowski et al., 2006). However, neither MEFs nor even cultured hepatocytes showed the same suppression of Hspa5 expression as seen in vivo. This discrepancy points to the existence of other as yet unappreciated factors that influence UPR output in the liver. Indeed, it is now becoming clear that, overlaid atop the structural framework of the canonical UPR lie modulatory pathways for altering UPR sensitivity and output, with potential implications for signaling during chronic stress. These include posttranslational modifications either of the stress sensors—such as S-nitrosylation of IRE1α (Yang et al., 2015)—or of ER chaperones, such as ADP ribosylation (Chambers et al., 2012) or AMPylation (Preissler et al., 2015) of BiP. It will be interesting to test whether any of these modifications is active during the chronic condition.

Finally, our results underscore the remarkable capacity of the UPR to adapt to chronic stress. While the severe experimental stresses that lead to massive cell death and organ dysfunction have proven useful in elucidating the signaling capabilities of the UPR when activated to its maximum, they yield little about the ebb and flow of the response at it is most likely to be activated in physiological scenarios. We hope that our approach will stimulate further efforts to more closely mimic physiological stresses in vivo, as these will be essential in linking chronic ER stress to human disease.

1. 1. Arensdorf AM
   2. Dezwaan McCabe D
   3. Kaufman RJ
   4. Rutkowski DT

   (2013a) Temporal clustering of gene expression links the metabolic transcription factor HNF4α to the ER stress-dependent gene regulatory network

   Frontiers in Genetics 4:188.

   https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2013.00188

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
2. 1. Arensdorf AM
   2. Diedrichs D
   3. Rutkowski DT

   (2013b) Regulation of the transcriptome by ER stress: non-canonical mechanisms and physiological consequences

   Frontiers in Genetics 4:256.

   https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2013.00256

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
3. 1. Arensdorf AM
   2. Rutkowski DT

   (2013) Endoplasmic reticulum stress impairs IL-4/IL-13 signaling through C/EBPβ-mediated transcriptional suppression

   Journal of Cell Science 126:4026–4036.

   https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.130757

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
4. 1. Bertolotti A
   2. Zhang Y
   3. Hendershot LM
   4. Harding HP
   5. Ron D

   (2000) Dynamic interaction of BiP and ER stress transducers in the unfolded-protein response

   Nature cell biology 2:326–332.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/35014014

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
5. 1. Bright MD
   2. Itzhak DN
   3. Wardell CP
   4. Morgan GJ
   5. Davies FE

   (2015) Cleavage of BLOC1S1 mRNA by IRE1 is sequence specific, temporally separate from XBP1 splicing, and dispensable for cell viability under acute endoplasmic reticulum stress

   Molecular and Cellular Biology 35:2186–2202.

   https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00013-15

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
6. 1. Calfon M
   2. Zeng H
   3. Urano F
   4. Till JH
   5. Hubbard SR
   6. Harding HP
   7. Clark SG
   8. Ron D

   (2002) IRE1 couples endoplasmic reticulum load to secretory capacity by processing the XBP-1 mRNA

   Nature 415:92–96.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/415092a

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
7. 1. Campfield LA
   2. Smith FJ
   3. Guisez Y
   4. Devos R
   5. Burn P

   (1995) Recombinant mouse OB protein: evidence for a peripheral signal linking adiposity and central neural networks

   Science 269:546–549.

   https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7624778

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
8. 1. Chambers JE
   2. Petrova K
   3. Tomba G
   4. Vendruscolo M
   5. Ron D

   (2012) ADP ribosylation adapts an ER chaperone response to short-term fluctuations in unfolded protein load

   The Journal of Cell Biology 198:371–385.

   https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201202005

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
9. 1. Chen H
   2. Charlat O
   3. Tartaglia LA
   4. Woolf EA
   5. Weng X
   6. Ellis SJ
   7. Lakey ND
   8. Culpepper J
   9. Moore KJ
   10. Breitbart RE
   11. Duyk GM
   12. Tepper RI
   13. Morgenstern JP

   (1996) Evidence that the diabetes gene encodes the leptin receptor: identification of a mutation in the leptin receptor gene in db/db mice

   Cell 84:491–495.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81294-5

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
10. 1. Chikka MR
    2. McCabe DD
    3. Tyra HM
    4. Rutkowski DT

    (2013) C/EBP homologous protein (CHOP) contributes to suppression of metabolic genes during endoplasmic reticulum stress in the liver

    Journal of Biological Chemistry 288:4405–4415.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M112.432344

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
11. 1. Cinaroglu A
    2. Gao C
    3. Imrie D
    4. Sadler KC

    (2011) Activating transcription factor 6 plays protective and pathological roles in steatosis due to endoplasmic reticulum stress in zebrafish

    Hepatology 54:495–508.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.24396

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
12. 1. Cretenet G
    2. Le Clech M
    3. Gachon F

    (2010) Circadian clock-coordinated 12 hr period rhythmic activation of the IRE1alpha pathway controls lipid metabolism in mouse liver

    Cell Metabolism 11:47–57.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2009.11.002

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
13. 1. Ezzati M
    2. Lopez AD
    3. Rodgers A
    4. Vander Hoorn S
    5. Murray CJ
    6. Comparative Risk Assessment Collaborating Group

    (2002) Selected major risk factors and global and regional burden of disease

    The Lancet 360:1347–1360.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11403-6

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
14. 1. Fan C
    2. Li Q
    3. Zhang Y
    4. Liu X
    5. Luo M
    6. Abbott D
    7. Zhou W
    8. Engelhardt JF

    (2004) IkappaBalpha and IkappaBbeta possess injury context-specific functions that uniquely influence hepatic NF-kappaB induction and inflammation

    Journal of Clinical Investigation 113:746–755.

    https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI17337

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
15. 1. Foufelle F
    2. Fromenty B

    (2016) Role of endoplasmic reticulum stress in drug-induced toxicity

    Pharmacology Research & Perspectives 4:e00211.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/prp2.211

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
16. 1. Gardner BM
    2. Pincus D
    3. Gotthardt K
    4. Gallagher CM
    5. Walter P

    (2013) Endoplasmic reticulum stress sensing in the unfolded protein response

    Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology 5:a013169.

    https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a013169

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
17. 1. Gardner BM
    2. Walter P

    (2011) Unfolded proteins are Ire1-activating ligands that directly induce the unfolded protein response

    Science 333:1891–1894.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1209126

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
18. 1. Gething MJ

    (1999) Role and regulation of the ER chaperone BiP

    Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology 10:465–472.

    https://doi.org/10.1006/scdb.1999.0318

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
19. 1. Gregor MF
    2. Hotamisligil GS

    (2011) Inflammatory mechanisms in obesity

    Annual Review of Immunology 29:415–445.

    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-immunol-031210-101322

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
20. 1. Halaas JL
    2. Gajiwala KS
    3. Maffei M
    4. Cohen SL
    5. Chait BT
    6. Rabinowitz D
    7. Lallone RL
    8. Burley SK
    9. Friedman JM

    (1995) Weight-reducing effects of the plasma protein encoded by the obese gene

    Science 269:543–546.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7624777

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
21. 1. Han D
    2. Lerner AG
    3. Vande Walle L
    4. Upton JP
    5. Xu W
    6. Hagen A
    7. Backes BJ
    8. Oakes SA
    9. Papa FR

    (2009) IRE1alpha kinase activation modes control alternate endoribonuclease outputs to determine divergent cell fates

    Cell 138:562–575.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.07.017

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
22. 1. Han D
    2. Upton JP
    3. Hagen A
    4. Callahan J
    5. Oakes SA
    6. Papa FR

    (2008) A kinase inhibitor activates the IRE1alpha RNase to confer cytoprotection against ER stress

    Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 365:777–783.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.11.040

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
23. 1. Harding HP
    2. Novoa I
    3. Zhang Y
    4. Zeng H
    5. Wek R
    6. Schapira M
    7. Ron D

    (2000) Regulated translation initiation controls stress-induced gene expression in mammalian cells

    Molecular Cell 6:1099–1108.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(00)00108-8

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
24. 1. Harding HP
    2. Zhang Y
    3. Ron D

    (1999) Protein translation and folding are coupled by an endoplasmic-reticulum-resident kinase

    Nature 397:271–274.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/16729

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
25. 1. Hollien J
    2. Lin JH
    3. Li H
    4. Stevens N
    5. Walter P
    6. Weissman JS

    (2009) Regulated Ire1-dependent decay of messenger RNAs in mammalian cells

    The Journal of Cell Biology 186:323–331.

    https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200903014

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
26. 1. Hollien J
    2. Weissman JS

    (2006) Decay of endoplasmic reticulum-localized mRNAs during the unfolded protein response

    Science 313:104–107.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1129631

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
27. 1. Hotamisligil GS

    (2010) Endoplasmic reticulum stress and the inflammatory basis of metabolic disease

    Cell 140:900–917.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.02.034

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
28. 1. Iwakoshi NN
    2. Lee AH
    3. Vallabhajosyula P
    4. Otipoby KL
    5. Rajewsky K
    6. Glimcher LH

    (2003) Plasma cell differentiation and the unfolded protein response intersect at the transcription factor XBP-1

    Nature Immunology 4:321–329.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/ni907

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
29. 1. Ji C
    2. Kaplowitz N
    3. Lau MY
    4. Kao E
    5. Petrovic LM
    6. Lee AS

    (2011) Liver-specific loss of glucose-regulated protein 78 perturbs the unfolded protein response and exacerbates a spectrum of liver diseases in mice

    Hepatology 54:229–239.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.24368

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
30. 1. Kaser A
    2. Adolph TE
    3. Blumberg RS

    (2013) The unfolded protein response and gastrointestinal disease

    Seminars in Immunopathology 35:307–319.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00281-013-0377-5

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
31. 1. Kawasaki K
    2. Ushioda R
    3. Ito S
    4. Ikeda K
    5. Masago Y
    6. Nagata K

    (2015) Deletion of the collagen-specific molecular chaperone Hsp47 causes endoplasmic reticulum stress-mediated apoptosis of hepatic stellate cells

    Journal of Biological Chemistry 290:3639–3646.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M114.592139

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
32. 1. Kimata Y
    2. Oikawa D
    3. Shimizu Y
    4. Ishiwata-Kimata Y
    5. Kohno K

    (2004) A role for BiP as an adjustor for the endoplasmic reticulum stress-sensing protein Ire1

    The Journal of Cell Biology 167:445–456.

    https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200405153

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
33. 1. Lee AH
    2. Chu GC
    3. Iwakoshi NN
    4. Glimcher LH

    (2005) XBP-1 is required for biogenesis of cellular secretory machinery of exocrine glands

    The EMBO Journal 24:4368–4380.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7600903

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
34. 1. Lee AH
    2. Iwakoshi NN
    3. Glimcher LH

    (2003) XBP-1 regulates a subset of endoplasmic reticulum resident chaperone genes in the unfolded protein response

    Molecular and Cellular Biology 23:7448–7459.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.23.21.7448-7459.2003

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
35. 1. Lee GH
    2. Proenca R
    3. Montez JM
    4. Carroll KM
    5. Darvishzadeh JG
    6. Lee JI
    7. Friedman JM

    (1996) Abnormal splicing of the leptin receptor in diabetic mice

    Nature 379:632–635.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/379632a0

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
36. 1. Lee K
    2. Tirasophon W
    3. Shen X
    4. Michalak M
    5. Prywes R
    6. Okada T
    7. Yoshida H
    8. Mori K
    9. Kaufman RJ

    (2002) IRE1-mediated unconventional mRNA splicing and S2P-mediated ATF6 cleavage merge to regulate XBP1 in signaling the unfolded protein response

    Genes & Development 16:452–466.

    https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.964702

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
37. 1. Lerner AG
    2. Upton JP
    3. Praveen PV
    4. Ghosh R
    5. Nakagawa Y
    6. Igbaria A
    7. Shen S
    8. Nguyen V
    9. Backes BJ
    10. Heiman M
    11. Heintz N
    12. Greengard P
    13. Hui S
    14. Tang Q
    15. Trusina A
    16. Oakes SA
    17. Papa FR

    (2012) IRE1α induces thioredoxin-interacting protein to activate the NLRP3 inflammasome and promote programmed cell death under irremediable ER stress

    Cell Metabolism 16:250–264.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2012.07.007

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
38. 1. Lin JH
    2. Li H
    3. Yasumura D
    4. Cohen HR
    5. Zhang C
    6. Panning B
    7. Shokat KM
    8. Lavail MM
    9. Walter P

    (2007) IRE1 signaling affects cell fate during the unfolded protein response

    Science 318:944–949.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1146361

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
39. 1. Malhi H
    2. Kaufman RJ

    (2011) Endoplasmic reticulum stress in liver disease

    Journal of Hepatology 54:795–809.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2010.11.005

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
40. 1. Marciniak SJ
    2. Yun CY
    3. Oyadomari S
    4. Novoa I
    5. Zhang Y
    6. Jungreis R
    7. Nagata K
    8. Harding HP
    9. Ron D

    (2004) CHOP induces death by promoting protein synthesis and oxidation in the stressed endoplasmic reticulum

    Genes & Development 18:3066–3077.

    https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1250704

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
41. 1. Maurel M
    2. Chevet E
    3. Tavernier J
    4. Gerlo S

    (2014) Getting RIDD of RNA: IRE1 in cell fate regulation

    Trends in Biochemical Sciences 39:245–254.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2014.02.008

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
42. 1. Muse GW
    2. Gilchrist DA
    3. Nechaev S
    4. Shah R
    5. Parker JS
    6. Grissom SF
    7. Zeitlinger J
    8. Adelman K

    (2007) RNA polymerase is poised for activation across the genome

    Nature Genetics 39:1507–1511.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2007.21

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
43. 1. Olden K
    2. Pratt RM
    3. Jaworski C
    4. Yamada KM

    (1979) Evidence for role of glycoprotein carbohydrates in membrane transport: specific inhibition by tunicamycin

    PNAS 76:791–795.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.76.2.791

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
44. 1. Oyadomari S
    2. Harding HP
    3. Zhang Y
    4. Oyadomari M
    5. Ron D

    (2008) Dephosphorylation of translation initiation factor 2alpha enhances glucose tolerance and attenuates hepatosteatosis in mice

    Cell Metabolism 7:520–532.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2008.04.011

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
45. 1. Ozcan U
    2. Cao Q
    3. Yilmaz E
    4. Lee AH
    5. Iwakoshi NN
    6. Ozdelen E
    7. Tuncman G
    8. Görgün C
    9. Glimcher LH
    10. Hotamisligil GS

    (2004) Endoplasmic reticulum stress links obesity, insulin action, and type 2 diabetes

    Science 306:457–461.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1103160

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
46. 1. Ozcan U
    2. Ozcan L
    3. Yilmaz E
    4. Düvel K
    5. Sahin M
    6. Manning BD
    7. Hotamisligil GS

    (2008) Loss of the tuberous sclerosis complex tumor suppressors triggers the unfolded protein response to regulate insulin signaling and apoptosis

    Molecular Cell 29:541–551.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2007.12.023

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
47. 1. Ozcan U
    2. Yilmaz E
    3. Ozcan L
    4. Furuhashi M
    5. Vaillancourt E
    6. Smith RO
    7. Görgün CZ
    8. Hotamisligil GS

    (2006) Chemical chaperones reduce ER stress and restore glucose homeostasis in a mouse model of type 2 diabetes

    Science 313:1137–1140.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1128294

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
48. 1. Patterson SI
    2. Skene JH

    (1995) Inhibition of dynamic protein palmitoylation in intact cells with tunicamycin

    Methods in Enzymology 250:284–300.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0076-6879(95)50079-0

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
49. 1. Pelleymounter MA
    2. Cullen MJ
    3. Baker MB
    4. Hecht R
    5. Winters D
    6. Boone T
    7. Collins F

    (1995) Effects of the obese gene product on body weight regulation in ob/ob mice

    Science 269:540–543.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7624776

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
50. 1. Pfaffenbach KT
    2. Nivala AM
    3. Reese L
    4. Ellis F
    5. Wang D
    6. Wei Y
    7. Pagliassotti MJ

    (2010) Rapamycin inhibits postprandial-mediated X-box-binding protein-1 splicing in rat liver

    Journal of Nutrition 140:879–884.

    https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.109.119883

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
51. 1. Preissler S
    2. Rato C
    3. Chen R
    4. Antrobus R
    5. Ding S
    6. Fearnley IM
    7. Ron D

    (2015) AMPylation matches BiP activity to client protein load in the endoplasmic reticulum

    eLife 4:e12621.

    https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.12621

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
52. 1. Resendez E
    2. Wooden SK
    3. Lee AS

    (1988) Identification of highly conserved regulatory domains and protein-binding sites in the promoters of the rat and human genes encoding the stress-inducible 78-kilodalton glucose-regulated protein

    Molecular and Cellular Biology 8:4579–4584.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.8.10.4579

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
53. 1. Rutkowski DT
    2. Arnold SM
    3. Miller CN
    4. Wu J
    5. Li J
    6. Gunnison KM
    7. Mori K
    8. Sadighi Akha AA
    9. Raden D
    10. Kaufman RJ

    (2006) Adaptation to ER stress is mediated by differential stabilities of pro-survival and pro-apoptotic mRNAs and proteins

    PLoS Biology 4:e374.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0040374

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
54. 1. Rutkowski DT
    2. Wu J
    3. Back SH
    4. Callaghan MU
    5. Ferris SP
    6. Iqbal J
    7. Clark R
    8. Miao H
    9. Hassler JR
    10. Fornek J
    11. Katze MG
    12. Hussain MM
    13. Song B
    14. Swathirajan J
    15. Wang J
    16. Yau GD
    17. Kaufman RJ

    (2008) UPR pathways combine to prevent hepatic steatosis caused by ER stress-mediated suppression of transcriptional master regulators

    Developmental Cell 15:829–840.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2008.10.015

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
55. 1. Sano R
    2. Reed JC

    (2013) ER stress-induced cell death mechanisms

    Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research 1833:3460–3470.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2013.06.028

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
56. 1. Shao M
    2. Shan B
    3. Liu Y
    4. Deng Y
    5. Yan C
    6. Wu Y
    7. Mao T
    8. Qiu Y
    9. Zhou Y
    10. Jiang S
    11. Jia W
    12. Li J
    13. Li J
    14. Rui L
    15. Yang L
    16. Liu Y

    (2014) Hepatic IRE1α regulates fasting-induced metabolic adaptive programs through the XBP1s-PPARα axis signalling

    Nature Communications 5:3528.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4528

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
57. 1. Shen J
    2. Chen X
    3. Hendershot L
    4. Prywes R

    (2002) ER stress regulation of ATF6 localization by dissociation of BiP/GRP78 binding and unmasking of Golgi localization signals

    Developmental Cell 3:99–111.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1534-5807(02)00203-4

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
58. 1. Shi Y
    2. Vattem KM
    3. Sood R
    4. An J
    5. Liang J
    6. Stramm L
    7. Wek RC

    (1998) Identification and characterization of pancreatic eukaryotic initiation factor 2 alpha-subunit kinase, PEK, involved in translational control

    Molecular and Cellular Biology 18:7499–7509.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.18.12.7499

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
59. 1. So JS
    2. Hur KY
    3. Tarrio M
    4. Ruda V
    5. Frank-Kamenetsky M
    6. Fitzgerald K
    7. Koteliansky V
    8. Lichtman AH
    9. Iwawaki T
    10. Glimcher LH
    11. Lee AH

    (2012) Silencing of lipid metabolism genes through IRE1α-mediated mRNA decay lowers plasma lipids in mice

    Cell metabolism 16:487–499.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2012.09.004

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
60. 1. Tyra HM
    2. Spitz DR
    3. Rutkowski DT

    (2012) Inhibition of fatty acid oxidation enhances oxidative protein folding and protects hepatocytes from endoplasmic reticulum stress

    Molecular Biology of the Cell 23:811–819.

    https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E11-12-1011

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
61. 1. Upton JP
    2. Wang L
    3. Han D
    4. Wang ES
    5. Huskey NE
    6. Lim L
    7. Truitt M
    8. McManus MT
    9. Ruggero D
    10. Goga A
    11. Papa FR
    12. Oakes SA

    (2012) IRE1α cleaves select microRNAs during ER stress to derepress translation of proapoptotic Caspase-2

    Science 338:818–822.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1226191

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
62. 1. van Anken E
    2. Romijn EP
    3. Maggioni C
    4. Mezghrani A
    5. Sitia R
    6. Braakman I
    7. Heck AJ

    (2003) Sequential waves of functionally related proteins are expressed when B cells prepare for antibody secretion

    Immunity 18:243–253.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1074-7613(03)00024-4

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
63. 1. Walter P
    2. Ron D

    (2011) The unfolded protein response: from stress pathway to homeostatic regulation

    Science 334:1081–1086.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1209038

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
64. 1. Wang J
    2. Pareja KA
    3. Kaiser CA
    4. Sevier CS

    (2014) Redox signaling via the molecular chaperone BiP protects cells against endoplasmic reticulum-derived oxidative stress

    eLife 3:e03496.

    https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03496

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
65. 1. Wang Y
    2. Vera L
    3. Fischer WH
    4. Montminy M

    (2009) The CREB coactivator CRTC2 links hepatic ER stress and fasting gluconeogenesis

    Nature 460:534–537.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08111

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
66. 1. Wu J
    2. Rutkowski DT
    3. Dubois M
    4. Swathirajan J
    5. Saunders T
    6. Wang J
    7. Song B
    8. Yau GD
    9. Kaufman RJ

    (2007) ATF6alpha optimizes long-term endoplasmic reticulum function to protect cells from chronic stress

    Developmental Cell 13:351–364.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2007.07.005

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
67. 1. Yamamoto K
    2. Takahara K
    3. Oyadomari S
    4. Okada T
    5. Sato T
    6. Harada A
    7. Mori K

    (2010) Induction of liver steatosis and lipid droplet formation in ATF6alpha-knockout mice burdened with pharmacological endoplasmic reticulum stress

    Molecular Biology of the Cell 21:2975–2986.

    https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E09-02-0133

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
68. 1. Yamamoto K
    2. Yoshida H
    3. Kokame K
    4. Kaufman RJ
    5. Mori K

    (2004) Differential contributions of ATF6 and XBP1 to the activation of endoplasmic reticulum stress-responsive cis-acting elements ERSE, UPRE and ERSE-II

    Journal of Biochemistry 136:343–350.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/jb/mvh122

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
69. 1. Yang L
    2. Calay ES
    3. Fan J
    4. Arduini A
    5. Kunz RC
    6. Gygi SP
    7. Yalcin A
    8. Fu S
    9. Hotamisligil GS

    (2015) METABOLISM. S-Nitrosylation links obesity-associated inflammation to endoplasmic reticulum dysfunction

    Science 349:500–506.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa0079

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
70. 1. Ye J
    2. Rawson RB
    3. Komuro R
    4. Chen X
    5. Davé UP
    6. Prywes R
    7. Brown MS
    8. Goldstein JL

    (2000) ER stress induces cleavage of membrane-bound ATF6 by the same proteases that process SREBPs

    Molecular Cell 6:1355–1364.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(00)00133-7

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
71. 1. Yoshida H
    2. Haze K
    3. Yanagi H
    4. Yura T
    5. Mori K

    (1998) Identification of the cis-acting endoplasmic reticulum stress response element responsible for transcriptional induction of mammalian glucose-regulated proteins. involvement of basic leucine zipper transcription factors

    Journal of Biological Chemistry 273:33741–33749.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.273.50.33741

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
72. 1. Yoshida H
    2. Matsui T
    3. Yamamoto A
    4. Okada T
    5. Mori K

    (2001) XBP1 mRNA is induced by ATF6 and spliced by IRE1 in response to ER stress to produce a highly active transcription factor

    Cell 107:881–891.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00611-0

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
73. 1. Young CN
    2. Cao X
    3. Guruju MR
    4. Pierce JP
    5. Morgan DA
    6. Wang G
    7. Iadecola C
    8. Mark AL
    9. Davisson RL

    (2012) ER stress in the brain subfornical organ mediates angiotensin-dependent hypertension

    Journal of Clinical Investigation 122:3960–3964.

    https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI64583

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
74. 1. Young CN
    2. Davisson RL

    (2015) Angiotensin-II, the Brain, and Hypertension: An update

    Hypertension 66:920–926.

    https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.115.03624

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
75. 1. Zhang K
    2. Shen X
    3. Wu J
    4. Sakaki K
    5. Saunders T
    6. Rutkowski DT
    7. Back SH
    8. Kaufman RJ

    (2006) Endoplasmic reticulum stress activates cleavage of CREBH to induce a systemic inflammatory response

    Cell 124:587–599.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2005.11.040

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
76. 1. Zhang K
    2. Wang S
    3. Malhotra J
    4. Hassler JR
    5. Back SH
    6. Wang G
    7. Chang L
    8. Xu W
    9. Miao H
    10. Leonardi R
    11. Chen YE
    12. Jackowski S
    13. Kaufman RJ

    (2011) The unfolded protein response transducer IRE1α prevents ER stress-induced hepatic steatosis

    The EMBO Journal 30:1357–1375.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2011.52

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
77. 1. Zhou AX
    2. Tabas I

    (2013) The UPR in atherosclerosis

    Seminars in Immunopathology 35:321–332.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00281-013-0372-x

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
78. 1. Zinszner H
    2. Kuroda M
    3. Wang X
    4. Batchvarova N
    5. Lightfoot RT
    6. Remotti H
    7. Stevens JL
    8. Ron D

    (1998) CHOP is implicated in programmed cell death in response to impaired function of the endoplasmic reticulum

    Genes & Development 12:982–995.

    https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.12.7.982

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
79. 1. Zode GS
    2. Kuehn MH
    3. Nishimura DY
    4. Searby CC
    5. Mohan K
    6. Grozdanic SD
    7. Bugge K
    8. Anderson MG
    9. Clark AF
    10. Stone EM
    11. Sheffield VC

    (2011) Reduction of ER stress via a chemical chaperone prevents disease phenotypes in a mouse model of primary open angle glaucoma

    Journal of Clinical Investigation 121:3542–3553.

    https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI58183

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar

Author details

1. Javier A Gomez

   Graduate Program in Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, United States

   Contribution

   JAG, Conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article

   Competing interests

   The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

2. D Thomas Rutkowski

   Departments of Anatomy and Cell Biology and Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, United States

   Contribution

   DTR, Conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article

   For correspondence

   thomas-rutkowski@uiowa.edu

   Competing interests

   The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6586-4449

• 3,439

  views

• 664

  downloads

• 36

  citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.