Innate Like Lymphocytes: Moving at the frontline
- University of Bonn, Germany
To fight off infectious microbes the cells of the immune system – including lymphocytes and monocytes – must migrate to the site of the infection. This concerted response requires an efficient communication process, which usually involves the immune cells releasing cytokines, interferons and other signaling molecules.
The immune system also ensures that some immune cells are already placed at sites at which a pathogen invasion (or re-invasion) may be anticipated (Mueller et al., 2013). These cells include "memory" cells that are associated with the adaptive immune system, such as T and B lymphocytes, and cells that are associated with the innate immune system, including innate lymphoid cells and innate-like T lymphocytes (Fan and Rudensky, 2016). Now, in eLife, Jason Cyster and co-workers at the University of California, San Francisco and the University of Dundee – including Yang Zhang as first author – report the identity of the molecules that coordinate the localization and migration of innate-like T lymphocytes during microbial defense (Zhang et al., 2016).
Innate-like T lymphocytes are a highly diverse group of cells and are typically found at barrier tissues like the gut, the skin or the lung (Godfrey et al., 2015), and in the lymph nodes that drain these barrier tissues. Since pathogens initially spread from infected tissues through the lymph rather than the blood (Trueta and Barnes, 1940), lymph nodes have a critical filter function. In lymph nodes, memory CD8 T cells and innate-like lymphocytes are localized close to the lymphatic sinuses – the sites where invading pathogens may be anticipated (Kastenmüller et al., 2013; Kastenmüller et al., 2012).
Macrophages that line the sinuses and express the surface marker CD169 play a critical role in orchestrating a heterogeneous group of immune cells that defend the lymph node. These macrophages are activated via various pattern recognition receptors (Latz et al., 2013). Activating such receptors leads to the assembly of the so-called inflammasome and to the consecutive cleavage and secretion of two critical cytokines (Schroder and Tschopp, 2010).
The two cytokines – interleukin-18 and interleukin-1β – work with other interleukins to activate different sets of immune cells. Interleukin-18 ultimately activates the immune cells that, in turn, produce an interferon called IFNγ, which acts on macrophages and boosts their capacity to ward off pathogens inside cells. The second cytokine, interleukin-1β, activates a set of innate-like T lymphocytes that respond by secreting another cytokine, interleukin-17. This leads to the recruitment of neutrophils – cells that are particularly critical for the defense against bacteria and fungi.
Zhang et al. analyzed the factors that regulate the migration patterns and localization of the innate-like T lymphocytes. In particular, they studied a group of these cells that have previously been characterized by the Cyster group; these cells reside in the lymph node and express a type of surface receptor called CXCR6 (Gray et al., 2012). Zhang et al. used a number of techniques to study these lymphocytes. The cells were visualized by combining intravital two-photon microscopy in mice with fluorescent confocal microscopy of tissue sections. In addition, antibody labeling tracked the cells that accessed the mouse lymphatic sinuses. Zhang et al. also analyzed the cellular immune response in mice that were exposed to microbial infections.
Strikingly, Zhang et al. found that the innate-like lymphocytes required a surface receptor called CCR6 for proper positioning near the lymphatic sinuses. In the absence of this receptor the innate-like lymphocytes were positioned in deeper areas of the lymph node. In line with this result, Zhang et al. identified lymphatic endothelial cells as the source of CCL20 – the chemokine that is sensed by CCR6 (see Figure 1). During an infection by S. aureus bacteria, innate-like T lymphocytes that lack CCR6 produced less interleukin-17 than normal. This occurred because the bulk of these cells were localized too far away to respond to interleukin 1β signals from the macrophages that line the sinuses. Thus to work effectively, innate-like T cells need to be placed close to the CD169-expressing macrophages that line the sinus.
Figure 1
The positioning of innate-like T lymphocytes in the lymph node is crucial for defending against pathogens.
Lymphatic epithelial cells (green) release the chemokine CCL20, resulting in a gradient in the lymph node that acts as a cue for innate-like T lymphocytes with CCR6 receptors on their surface (CCR6+; ochre cells) to migrate toward the subcapsular sinus area (the region of the lymph node where lymph enters the tissue). There, the innate-like T lymphocytes can sense interleukin-1β (IL-1β) that the macrophages that line the sinus (blue cells) release locally in response to the activation of the inflammasome. Together with interleukin-23 (not shown), IL-1β activates the CCR6+ innate-like lymphocytes, which in turn produce interleukin-17 (IL-17). IL-17 is a critical factor for microbial defense because it promotes the recruitment of other innate immune cells – neutrophils and monocytes. The graphical illustration was designed and kindly provided by Karl Komander.
A number of other factors (the signaling molecule S1P, and the surface receptors ICAM and CD169) were shown to orchestrate “excursions” of a subset of innate-like T cells (γδ T cells that express Vγ4) into the lymphatic sinuses of the lymph node. The data are compelling, yet the antimicrobial response remained unaltered if these factors were experimentally perturbed. The biological implication of this particular migration pattern therefore requires further investigation.
Overall, Zhang et al. have taken a major step toward a better understanding of the microanatomy of the lymph node and the cellular dynamics of innate-like lymphocytes during homeostasis and after microbial infection. Identifying the factor that regulates the positioning of innate-like T cells has directly demonstrated the functional importance of lymphocyte localization for defending against pathogens.
References
-
The burgeoning family of unconventional T cellsNature Immunology 16:1114–1123.https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.3298
-
Activation and regulation of the inflammasomesNature Reviews Immunology 13:397–411.https://doi.org/10.1038/nri3452
-
Memory T cell subsets, migration patterns, and tissue residenceAnnual Review of Immunology 31:137–161.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-immunol-032712-095954
Article and author information
Author details
Publication history
- Version of Record published: September 9, 2016 (version 1)
Copyright
© 2016, Ataíde et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 2,929
- views
-
- 163
- downloads
-
- 1
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Innate Like Lymphocytes: Moving at the frontline
eLife 5:e20516.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20516
Further reading
-
- Evolutionary Biology
- Immunology and Inflammation
CD4+ T cell activation is driven by five-module receptor complexes. The T cell receptor (TCR) is the receptor module that binds composite surfaces of peptide antigens embedded within MHCII molecules (pMHCII). It associates with three signaling modules (CD3γε, CD3δε, and CD3ζζ) to form TCR-CD3 complexes. CD4 is the coreceptor module. It reciprocally associates with TCR-CD3-pMHCII assemblies on the outside of a CD4+ T cells and with the Src kinase, LCK, on the inside. Previously, we reported that the CD4 transmembrane GGXXG and cytoplasmic juxtamembrane (C/F)CV+C motifs found in eutherian (placental mammal) CD4 have constituent residues that evolved under purifying selection (Lee et al., 2022). Expressing mutants of these motifs together in T cell hybridomas increased CD4-LCK association but reduced CD3ζ, ZAP70, and PLCγ1 phosphorylation levels, as well as IL-2 production, in response to agonist pMHCII. Because these mutants preferentially localized CD4-LCK pairs to non-raft membrane fractions, one explanation for our results was that they impaired proximal signaling by sequestering LCK away from TCR-CD3. An alternative hypothesis is that the mutations directly impacted signaling because the motifs normally play an LCK-independent role in signaling. The goal of this study was to discriminate between these possibilities. Using T cell hybridomas, our results indicate that: intracellular CD4-LCK interactions are not necessary for pMHCII-specific signal initiation; the GGXXG and (C/F)CV+C motifs are key determinants of CD4-mediated pMHCII-specific signal amplification; the GGXXG and (C/F)CV+C motifs exert their functions independently of direct CD4-LCK association. These data provide a mechanistic explanation for why residues within these motifs are under purifying selection in jawed vertebrates. The results are also important to consider for biomimetic engineering of synthetic receptors.
-
- Genetics and Genomics
- Immunology and Inflammation
Transposable elements (TEs) are repetitive sequences representing ~45% of the human and mouse genomes and are highly expressed by medullary thymic epithelial cells (mTECs). In this study, we investigated the role of TEs on T-cell development in the thymus. We performed multiomic analyses of TEs in human and mouse thymic cells to elucidate their role in T-cell development. We report that TE expression in the human thymus is high and shows extensive age- and cell lineage-related variations. TE expression correlates with multiple transcription factors in all cell types of the human thymus. Two cell types express particularly broad TE repertoires: mTECs and plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs). In mTECs, transcriptomic data suggest that TEs interact with transcription factors essential for mTEC development and function (e.g., PAX1 and REL), and immunopeptidomic data showed that TEs generate MHC-I-associated peptides implicated in thymocyte education. Notably, AIRE, FEZF2, and CHD4 regulate small yet non-redundant sets of TEs in murine mTECs. Human thymic pDCs homogenously express large numbers of TEs that likely form dsRNA, which can activate innate immune receptors, potentially explaining why thymic pDCs constitutively secrete IFN ɑ/β. This study highlights the diversity of interactions between TEs and the adaptive immune system. TEs are genetic parasites, and the two thymic cell types most affected by TEs (mTEcs and pDCs) are essential to establishing central T-cell tolerance. Therefore, we propose that orchestrating TE expression in thymic cells is critical to prevent autoimmunity in vertebrates.
