The factors that regulate how immune cells called innate-like lymphocytes are localized in the tissue have been identified.
To fight off infectious microbes the cells of the immune system – including lymphocytes and monocytes – must migrate to the site of the infection. This concerted response requires an efficient communication process, which usually involves the immune cells releasing cytokines, interferons and other signaling molecules.
The immune system also ensures that some immune cells are already placed at sites at which a pathogen invasion (or re-invasion) may be anticipated (Mueller et al., 2013). These cells include "memory" cells that are associated with the adaptive immune system, such as T and B lymphocytes, and cells that are associated with the innate immune system, including innate lymphoid cells and innate-like T lymphocytes (Fan and Rudensky, 2016). Now, in eLife, Jason Cyster and co-workers at the University of California, San Francisco and the University of Dundee – including Yang Zhang as first author – report the identity of the molecules that coordinate the localization and migration of innate-like T lymphocytes during microbial defense (Zhang et al., 2016).
Innate-like T lymphocytes are a highly diverse group of cells and are typically found at barrier tissues like the gut, the skin or the lung (Godfrey et al., 2015), and in the lymph nodes that drain these barrier tissues. Since pathogens initially spread from infected tissues through the lymph rather than the blood (Trueta and Barnes, 1940), lymph nodes have a critical filter function. In lymph nodes, memory CD8 T cells and innate-like lymphocytes are localized close to the lymphatic sinuses – the sites where invading pathogens may be anticipated (Kastenmüller et al., 2013; Kastenmüller et al., 2012).
Macrophages that line the sinuses and express the surface marker CD169 play a critical role in orchestrating a heterogeneous group of immune cells that defend the lymph node. These macrophages are activated via various pattern recognition receptors (Latz et al., 2013). Activating such receptors leads to the assembly of the so-called inflammasome and to the consecutive cleavage and secretion of two critical cytokines (Schroder and Tschopp, 2010).
The two cytokines – interleukin-18 and interleukin-1β – work with other interleukins to activate different sets of immune cells. Interleukin-18 ultimately activates the immune cells that, in turn, produce an interferon called IFNγ, which acts on macrophages and boosts their capacity to ward off pathogens inside cells. The second cytokine, interleukin-1β, activates a set of innate-like T lymphocytes that respond by secreting another cytokine, interleukin-17. This leads to the recruitment of neutrophils – cells that are particularly critical for the defense against bacteria and fungi.
Zhang et al. analyzed the factors that regulate the migration patterns and localization of the innate-like T lymphocytes. In particular, they studied a group of these cells that have previously been characterized by the Cyster group; these cells reside in the lymph node and express a type of surface receptor called CXCR6 (Gray et al., 2012). Zhang et al. used a number of techniques to study these lymphocytes. The cells were visualized by combining intravital two-photon microscopy in mice with fluorescent confocal microscopy of tissue sections. In addition, antibody labeling tracked the cells that accessed the mouse lymphatic sinuses. Zhang et al. also analyzed the cellular immune response in mice that were exposed to microbial infections.
Strikingly, Zhang et al. found that the innate-like lymphocytes required a surface receptor called CCR6 for proper positioning near the lymphatic sinuses. In the absence of this receptor the innate-like lymphocytes were positioned in deeper areas of the lymph node. In line with this result, Zhang et al. identified lymphatic endothelial cells as the source of CCL20 – the chemokine that is sensed by CCR6 (see Figure 1). During an infection by S. aureus bacteria, innate-like T lymphocytes that lack CCR6 produced less interleukin-17 than normal. This occurred because the bulk of these cells were localized too far away to respond to interleukin 1β signals from the macrophages that line the sinuses. Thus to work effectively, innate-like T cells need to be placed close to the CD169-expressing macrophages that line the sinus.
A number of other factors (the signaling molecule S1P, and the surface receptors ICAM and CD169) were shown to orchestrate “excursions” of a subset of innate-like T cells (γδ T cells that express Vγ4) into the lymphatic sinuses of the lymph node. The data are compelling, yet the antimicrobial response remained unaltered if these factors were experimentally perturbed. The biological implication of this particular migration pattern therefore requires further investigation.
Overall, Zhang et al. have taken a major step toward a better understanding of the microanatomy of the lymph node and the cellular dynamics of innate-like lymphocytes during homeostasis and after microbial infection. Identifying the factor that regulates the positioning of innate-like T cells has directly demonstrated the functional importance of lymphocyte localization for defending against pathogens.
Memory T cell subsets, migration patterns, and tissue residenceAnnual Review of Immunology 31:137–161.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-immunol-032712-095954
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Recognition of DNA viruses, such as cytomegaloviruses (CMVs), through pattern-recognition receptor (PRR) pathways involving MyD88 or STING constitute a first-line defense against infections mainly through production of type I interferon (IFN-I). However, the role of these pathways in different tissues is incompletely understood, an issue particularly relevant to the CMVs which have broad tissue tropisms. Herein, we contrasted anti-viral effects of MyD88 versus STING in distinct cell types that are infected with murine CMV (MCMV). Bone marrow chimeras revealed STING-mediated MCMV control in hematological cells, similar to MyD88. However, unlike MyD88, STING also contributed to viral control in non-hematological, stromal cells. Infected splenic stromal cells produced IFN-I in a cGAS-STING-dependent and MyD88-independent manner, while we confirmed plasmacytoid dendritic cell IFN-I had inverse requirements. MCMV-induced natural killer cytotoxicity was dependent on MyD88 and STING. Thus, MyD88 and STING contribute to MCMV control in distinct cell types that initiate downstream immune responses.
Conventional Ly6Chi monocytes have developmental plasticity for a spectrum of differentiated phagocytes. Here we show, using conditional deletion strategies in a mouse model of Toll-like receptor (TLR) 7-induced inflammation, that the spectrum of developmental cell fates of Ly6Chi monocytes, and the resultant inflammation, is coordinately regulated by TLR and Notch signaling. Cell-intrinsic Notch2 and TLR7-Myd88 pathways independently and synergistically promote Ly6Clo patrolling monocyte development from Ly6Chi monocytes under inflammatory conditions, while impairment in either signaling axis impairs Ly6Clo monocyte development. At the same time, TLR7 stimulation in the absence of functional Notch2 signaling promotes resident tissue macrophage gene expression signatures in monocytes in the blood and ectopic differentiation of Ly6Chi monocytes into macrophages and dendritic cells, which infiltrate the spleen and major blood vessels and are accompanied by aberrant systemic inflammation. Thus, Notch2 is a master regulator of Ly6Chi monocyte cell fate and inflammation in response to TLR signaling.