Abstract

Mediator-associated kinases CDK8/19 are context-dependent drivers or suppressors of tumorigenesis. Their inhibition is predicted to have pleiotropic effects, but it is unclear whether this will impact on the clinical utility of CDK8/19 inhibitors. We discovered two series of potent chemical probes with high selectivity for CDK8/19. Despite pharmacodynamic evidence for robust on-target activity, the compounds exhibited modest, though significant, efficacy against human tumor lines and patient-derived xenografts. Altered gene expression was consistent with CDK8/19 inhibition, including profiles associated with super-enhancers, immune and inflammatory responses and stem cell function. In a mouse model expressing oncogenic beta-catenin, treatment shifted cells within hyperplastic intestinal crypts from a stem cell to a transit amplifying phenotype. In two species, neither probe was tolerated at therapeutically-relevant exposures. The complex nature of the toxicity observed with two structurally-differentiated chemical series is consistent with on-target effects posing significant challenges to the clinical development of CDK8/19 inhibitors.

Data availability

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used
    1. Subramanian A
    2. Tamayo P
    3. Mootha VK
    4. Mukherjee S
    5. Ebert BL
    6. Gillette MA
    7. Paulovich A
    8. Pomeroy SL
    9. Golub TR
    10. Lander ES
    11. Mesirov JP
    (2007) Molecular Signatures Database v5.1
    Available at the Gene Set Enrichment Analysis site (http://software.broadinstitute.org/gsea/msigdb/). Users are required to register to view the MSigDB gene sets and/or download the GSEA software.
    1. Subramanian A
    2. Tamayo P
    3. Mootha VK
    4. Mukherjee S
    5. Ebert BL
    6. Gillette MA
    7. Paulovich A
    8. Pomeroy SL
    9. Golub TR
    10. Lander ES
    11. Mesirov JP
    (2007) Molecular Signatures Database v5.1
    Available at the Gene Set Enrichment Analysis site (http://software.broadinstitute.org/gsea/msigdb/). Users are required to register to view the MSigDB gene sets and/or download the GSEA software.
    1. Subramanian A
    2. Tamayo P
    3. Mootha VK
    4. Mukherjee S
    5. Ebert BL
    6. Gillette MA
    7. Paulovich A
    8. Pomeroy SL
    9. Golub TR
    10. Lander ES
    11. Mesirov JP
    (2007) Molecular Signatures Database v5.1
    Available at the Gene Set Enrichment Analysis site (http://software.broadinstitute.org/gsea/msigdb/). Users are required to register to view the MSigDB gene sets and/or download the GSEA software.
    1. Subramanian A
    2. Tamayo P
    3. Mootha VK
    4. Mukherjee S
    5. Ebert BL
    6. Gillette MA
    7. Paulovich A
    8. Pomeroy SL
    9. Golub TR
    10. Lander ES
    11. Mesirov JP
    (2007) Molecular Signatures Database v5.1
    Available at the Gene Set Enrichment Analysis site (http://software.broadinstitute.org/gsea/msigdb/). Users are required to register to view the MSigDB gene sets and/or download the GSEA software.
    1. Subramanian A
    2. Tamayo P
    3. Mootha VK
    4. Mukherjee S
    5. Ebert BL
    6. Gillette MA
    7. Paulovich A
    8. Pomeroy SL
    9. Golub TR
    10. Lander ES
    11. Mesirov JP
    (2007) Molecular Signatures Database v5.1
    Available at the Gene Set Enrichment Analysis site (http://software.broadinstitute.org/gsea/msigdb/). Users are required to register to view the MSigDB gene sets and/or download the GSEA software.
    1. Subramanian A
    2. Tamayo P
    3. Mootha VK
    4. Mukherjee S
    5. Ebert BL
    6. Gillette MA
    7. Paulovich A
    8. Pomeroy SL
    9. Golub TR
    10. Lander ES
    11. Mesirov JP
    (2007) Molecular Signatures Database v5.1
    Available at the Gene Set Enrichment Analysis site (http://software.broadinstitute.org/gsea/msigdb/). Users are required to register to view the MSigDB gene sets and/or download the GSEA software.
    1. Subramanian A
    2. Tamayo P
    3. Mootha VK
    4. Mukherjee S
    5. Ebert BL
    6. Gillette MA
    7. Paulovich A
    8. Pomeroy SL
    9. Golub TR
    10. Lander ES
    11. Mesirov JP
    (2007) Molecular Signatures Database v5.1
    Available at the Gene Set Enrichment Analysis site (http://software.broadinstitute.org/gsea/msigdb/). Users are required to register to view the MSigDB gene sets and/or download the GSEA software.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Paul Andrew Clarke

    Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    paul.clarke@icr.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    Paul Andrew Clarke, Current or former employee of The Institute of Cancer Research, which has a commercial interest in the development of WNT pathway inhibitors.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9342-1290
  2. Maria-Jesus Ortiz-Ruiz

    Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    Maria-Jesus Ortiz-Ruiz, Current or former employee of The Institute of Cancer Research, which has a commercial interest in the development of WNT pathway inhibitors.
  3. Robert TePoele

    Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    Robert TePoele, Current or former employee of The Institute of Cancer Research, which has a commercial interest in the development of WNT pathway inhibitors.
  4. Olajumoke Adeniji-Popoola

    Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    Olajumoke Adeniji-Popoola, Current or former employee of The Institute of Cancer Research, which has a commercial interest in the development of WNT pathway inhibitors.
  5. Gary Box

    Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    Gary Box, Current or former employee of The Institute of Cancer Research, which has a commercial interest in the development of WNT pathway inhibitors.
  6. Will Court

    Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    Will Court, Current or former employee of The Institute of Cancer Research, which has a commercial interest in the development of WNT pathway inhibitors.
  7. Stefanie Czasch

    Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
    Competing interests
    Stefanie Czasch, Current or former employee of Merck KGaA (Darmstadt, Germany), which has a commercial interest in the development of WNT pathway inhibitors.
  8. Samer El Bawab

    Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
    Competing interests
    Samer El Bawab, Current or former employee of Merck KGaA (Darmstadt, Germany), which has a commercial interest in the development of WNT pathway inhibitors.
  9. Christina Esdar

    Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
    Competing interests
    Christina Esdar, Current or former employee of Merck KGaA (Darmstadt, Germany), which has a commercial interest in the development of WNT pathway inhibitors.
  10. Ken Ewan

    School of Bioscience, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Sharon Gowan

    Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    Sharon Gowan, Current or former employee of The Institute of Cancer Research, which has a commercial interest in the development of WNT pathway inhibitors.
  12. Alexis De Haven Brandon

    Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    Alexis De Haven Brandon, Current or former employee of The Institute of Cancer Research, which has a commercial interest in the development of WNT pathway inhibitors.
  13. Phllip Hewitt

    Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
    Competing interests
    Phllip Hewitt, Current or former employee of Merck KGaA (Darmstadt, Germany), which has a commercial interest in the development of WNT pathway inhibitors.
  14. Stephen M Hobbs

    Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    Stephen M Hobbs, Current or former employee of The Institute of Cancer Research, which has a commercial interest in the development of WNT pathway inhibitors.
  15. Wolfgang Kaufmann

    Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
    Competing interests
    Wolfgang Kaufmann, Current or former employee of Merck KGaA (Darmstadt, Germany), which has a commercial interest in the development of WNT pathway inhibitors.
  16. Aurélie Mallinger

    Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    Aurélie Mallinger, Current or former employee of The Institute of Cancer Research, which has a commercial interest in the development of WNT pathway inhibitors.
  17. Florence Raynaud

    Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    Florence Raynaud, Current or former employee of The Institute of Cancer Research, which has a commercial interest in the development of WNT pathway inhibitors.
  18. Toby Roe

    Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    Toby Roe, Current or former employee of The Institute of Cancer Research, which has a commercial interest in the development of WNT pathway inhibitors.
  19. Felix Rohdich

    Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
    Competing interests
    Felix Rohdich, Current or former employee of Merck KGaA (Darmstadt, Germany), which has a commercial interest in the development of WNT pathway inhibitors.
  20. Kai Schiemann

    Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
    Competing interests
    Kai Schiemann, Current or former employee of Merck KGaA (Darmstadt, Germany), which has a commercial interest in the development of WNT pathway inhibitors.
  21. Stephanie Simon

    Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
    Competing interests
    Stephanie Simon, Current or former employee of Merck KGaA (Darmstadt, Germany), which has a commercial interest in the development of WNT pathway inhibitors.
  22. Richard Schneider

    Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
    Competing interests
    Richard Schneider, Current or former employee of Merck KGaA (Darmstadt, Germany), which has a commercial interest in the development of WNT pathway inhibitors.
  23. Melanie Valenti

    Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    Melanie Valenti, Current or former employee of The Institute of Cancer Research, which has a commercial interest in the development of WNT pathway inhibitors.
  24. Stefan Weigt

    Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
    Competing interests
    Stefan Weigt, KGaA (Darmstadt, Germany), which has a commercial interest in the development of WNT pathway inhibitors.
  25. Julian Blagg

    Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    Julian Blagg, Current or former employee of The Institute of Cancer Research, which has a commercial interest in the development of WNT pathway inhibitors.
  26. Andree Blaukat

    Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
    Competing interests
    Andree Blaukat, Current or former employee of Merck KGaA (Darmstadt, Germany), which has a commercial interest in the development of WNT pathway inhibitors.
  27. Trevor C Dale

    School of Bioscience, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    daletc@cardiff.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  28. Suzanne A Eccles

    Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    Suzanne A Eccles, Current or former employee of The Institute of Cancer Research, which has a commercial interest in the development of WNT pathway inhibitors.
  29. Stefan Hecht

    Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
    Competing interests
    Stefan Hecht, Current or former employee of Merck KGaA (Darmstadt, Germany), which has a commercial interest in the development of WNT pathway inhibitors.
  30. Klaus Urbahns

    Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
    Competing interests
    Klaus Urbahns, Current or former employee of Merck KGaA (Darmstadt, Germany), which has a commercial interest in the development of WNT pathway inhibitors.
  31. Paul Workman

    Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    paul.workman@icr.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    Paul Workman, Current or former employee of The Institute of Cancer Research, which has a commercial interest in the development of WNT pathway inhibitors.
  32. Dirk Wienke

    Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
    For correspondence
    dirk.wienke@merckgroup.com
    Competing interests
    Dirk Wienke, Current or former employee of Merck KGaA (Darmstadt, Germany), which has a commercial interest in the development of WNT pathway inhibitors.

Funding

Cancer Research UK (C309/A11566, C368/A6743, A368/A7990)

  • Paul Workman

Breast Cancer Now (2008MayPR16)

  • Trevor C Dale

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: In the UK, all animal work was conducted in accordance with National Institute for Cancer Research guidelines, with the research programme and procedures approved by the local Animal Welfare and Ethical Review Boards and subject to UK Government Home Office regulations (Licence PPL 70/7635 & PPL 30/3279). In Germany the animal work was carried out in accordance with the German Law on the Protection of Animals (Article 8a) and the pertaining files at the at the local animal welfare authorities in Darmstadt and Freiburg bear the references DA/375, DA4/1003, DA4/1004 and G13/13 respectively. The studies were designed in accordance with presently valid international study guidelines (e.g. ICH guideline M3 R2) and performed in compliance with animal health and welfare guidelines.The Institute of Cancer Research does not use non-rodent species in research and, where this is deemed essential, requires ethical approval for use by organizations with whom we collaborate. Pharmacokinetic and tolerability analysis of compounds in dogs, necessary for prediction of human pharmacokinetics, was approved by the ICR Animal Welfare and Ethical Review Board. Studies were sponsored and conducted in full compliance with national regulations at an Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care accredited site of Merck Biopharma.

Copyright

© 2016, Clarke et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,379
    views
  • 1,217
    downloads
  • 74
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Paul Andrew Clarke
  2. Maria-Jesus Ortiz-Ruiz
  3. Robert TePoele
  4. Olajumoke Adeniji-Popoola
  5. Gary Box
  6. Will Court
  7. Stefanie Czasch
  8. Samer El Bawab
  9. Christina Esdar
  10. Ken Ewan
  11. Sharon Gowan
  12. Alexis De Haven Brandon
  13. Phllip Hewitt
  14. Stephen M Hobbs
  15. Wolfgang Kaufmann
  16. Aurélie Mallinger
  17. Florence Raynaud
  18. Toby Roe
  19. Felix Rohdich
  20. Kai Schiemann
  21. Stephanie Simon
  22. Richard Schneider
  23. Melanie Valenti
  24. Stefan Weigt
  25. Julian Blagg
  26. Andree Blaukat
  27. Trevor C Dale
  28. Suzanne A Eccles
  29. Stefan Hecht
  30. Klaus Urbahns
  31. Paul Workman
  32. Dirk Wienke
(2016)
Assessing the mechanism and therapeutic potential of modulators of the human Mediator complex-associated protein kinases
eLife 5:e20722.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20722

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20722

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Immunology and Inflammation
    Sofia V Krasik, Ekaterina A Bryushkova ... Ekaterina O Serebrovskaya
    Research Article

    The current understanding of humoral immune response in cancer patients suggests that tumors may be infiltrated with diffuse B cells of extra-tumoral origin or may develop organized lymphoid structures, where somatic hypermutation and antigen-driven selection occur locally. These processes are believed to be significantly influenced by the tumor microenvironment through secretory factors and biased cell-cell interactions. To explore the manifestation of this influence, we used deep unbiased immunoglobulin profiling and systematically characterized the relationships between B cells in circulation, draining lymph nodes (draining LNs), and tumors in 14 patients with three human cancers. We demonstrated that draining LNs are differentially involved in the interaction with the tumor site, and that significant heterogeneity exists even between different parts of a single lymph node (LN). Next, we confirmed and elaborated upon previous observations regarding intratumoral immunoglobulin heterogeneity. We identified B cell receptor (BCR) clonotypes that were expanded in tumors relative to draining LNs and blood and observed that these tumor-expanded clonotypes were less hypermutated than non-expanded (ubiquitous) clonotypes. Furthermore, we observed a shift in the properties of complementarity-determining region 3 of the BCR heavy chain (CDR-H3) towards less mature and less specific BCR repertoire in tumor-infiltrating B-cells compared to circulating B-cells, which may indicate less stringent control for antibody-producing B cell development in tumor microenvironment (TME). In addition, we found repertoire-level evidence that B-cells may be selected according to their CDR-H3 physicochemical properties before they activate somatic hypermutation (SHM). Altogether, our work outlines a broad picture of the differences in the tumor BCR repertoire relative to non-tumor tissues and points to the unexpected features of the SHM process.

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Computational and Systems Biology
    Rosalyn W Sayaman, Masaru Miyano ... Mark A LaBarge
    Research Article Updated

    Effects from aging in single cells are heterogenous, whereas at the organ- and tissue-levels aging phenotypes tend to appear as stereotypical changes. The mammary epithelium is a bilayer of two major phenotypically and functionally distinct cell lineages: luminal epithelial and myoepithelial cells. Mammary luminal epithelia exhibit substantial stereotypical changes with age that merit attention because these cells are the putative cells-of-origin for breast cancers. We hypothesize that effects from aging that impinge upon maintenance of lineage fidelity increase susceptibility to cancer initiation. We generated and analyzed transcriptomes from primary luminal epithelial and myoepithelial cells from younger <30 (y)ears old and older >55 y women. In addition to age-dependent directional changes in gene expression, we observed increased transcriptional variance with age that contributed to genome-wide loss of lineage fidelity. Age-dependent variant responses were common to both lineages, whereas directional changes were almost exclusively detected in luminal epithelia and involved altered regulation of chromatin and genome organizers such as SATB1. Epithelial expression variance of gap junction protein GJB6 increased with age, and modulation of GJB6 expression in heterochronous co-cultures revealed that it provided a communication conduit from myoepithelial cells that drove directional change in luminal cells. Age-dependent luminal transcriptomes comprised a prominent signal that could be detected in bulk tissue during aging and transition into cancers. A machine learning classifier based on luminal-specific aging distinguished normal from cancer tissue and was highly predictive of breast cancer subtype. We speculate that luminal epithelia are the ultimate site of integration of the variant responses to aging in their surrounding tissue, and that their emergent phenotype both endows cells with the ability to become cancer-cells-of-origin and represents a biosensor that presages cancer susceptibility.