Sam68 promotes self-renewal and glycolytic metabolism in mouse neural progenitor cells by modulating Aldh1a3 pre-mRNA 3'-end processing

  1. Piergiorgio La Rosa
  2. Pamela Bielli
  3. Claudia Compagnucci
  4. Eleonora Cesari
  5. Elisabetta Volpe
  6. Stefano Farioli Vecchioli
  7. Claudio Sette  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Rome Tor Vergata, Italy
  2. Fondazione Santa Lucia, Italy
  3. Institute of Cell Biology and Neurobiology CNR, Italy

Abstract

The balance between self-renewal and differentiation of neural progenitor cells (NPCs) dictates neurogenesis and proper brain development. We found that the RNA binding protein Sam68 is strongly expressed in neurogenic areas of the neocortex and supports the self-renewing potential of mouse NPCs. Knockout of Sam68 constricted the pool of proliferating NPCs by accelerating their cell cycle exit and differentiation into post-mitotic neurons. Sam68 function was linked to regulation of Aldh1a3 pre-mRNA 3'-end processing. Binding of Sam68 to an intronic polyadenylation site prevents its recognition and premature transcript termination, favouring expression of a functional enzyme. The lower ALDH1A3 expression and activity in Sam68-/- NPCs results in reduced glycolysis and clonogenicity, thus depleting the embryonic NPC pool and limiting cortical expansion. Our study identifies Sam68 as a key regulator of NPC self-renewal and establishes a novel link between modulation of ALDH1A3 expression and maintenance of high glycolytic metabolism in the developing cortex.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Piergiorgio La Rosa

    Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Pamela Bielli

    Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Claudia Compagnucci

    Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Eleonora Cesari

    Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Elisabetta Volpe

    Neuroimmunology, Fondazione Santa Lucia, Rome, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Stefano Farioli Vecchioli

    Institute of Cell Biology and Neurobiology CNR, Rome, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Claudio Sette

    Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
    For correspondence
    claudio.sette@uniroma2.it
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2864-8266

Funding

Telethon (GGP14095)

  • Claudio Sette

Associazione Italiana Ricerca sul Cancro (IG14581)

  • Claudio Sette

Muscular Dystrophy Association

  • Claudio Sette

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the Italian Ministry of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee of the University ofRome Tor Vergata. The protocol was approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of the University of Rome Tor Vergata. Every effort was made to minimize suffering of mice.

Copyright

© 2016, La Rosa et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,994
    views
  • 410
    downloads
  • 53
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Piergiorgio La Rosa
  2. Pamela Bielli
  3. Claudia Compagnucci
  4. Eleonora Cesari
  5. Elisabetta Volpe
  6. Stefano Farioli Vecchioli
  7. Claudio Sette
(2016)
Sam68 promotes self-renewal and glycolytic metabolism in mouse neural progenitor cells by modulating Aldh1a3 pre-mRNA 3'-end processing
eLife 5:e20750.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20750

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20750

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Chengfang Pan, Ying Liu ... Changlong Hu
    Research Article

    Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) is an endogenous inhibitor of glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS) and plays an important role in pancreatic β-cell dysfunction in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This study aimed to explore the underlying mechanism by which PGE2 inhibits GSIS. Our results showed that PGE2 inhibited Kv2.2 channels via increasing PKA activity in HEK293T cells overexpressed with Kv2.2 channels. Point mutation analysis demonstrated that S448 residue was responsible for the PKA-dependent modulation of Kv2.2. Furthermore, the inhibitory effect of PGE2 on Kv2.2 was blocked by EP2/4 receptor antagonists, while mimicked by EP2/4 receptor agonists. The immune fluorescence results showed that EP1–4 receptors are expressed in both mouse and human β-cells. In INS-1(832/13) β-cells, PGE2 inhibited voltage-gated potassium currents and electrical activity through EP2/4 receptors and Kv2.2 channels. Knockdown of Kcnb2 reduced the action potential firing frequency and alleviated the inhibition of PGE2 on GSIS in INS-1(832/13) β-cells. PGE2 impaired glucose tolerance in wild-type mice but did not alter glucose tolerance in Kcnb2 knockout mice. Knockout of Kcnb2 reduced electrical activity, GSIS and abrogated the inhibition of PGE2 on GSIS in mouse islets. In conclusion, we have demonstrated that PGE2 inhibits GSIS in pancreatic β-cells through the EP2/4-Kv2.2 signaling pathway. The findings highlight the significant role of Kv2.2 channels in the regulation of β-cell repetitive firing and insulin secretion, and contribute to the understanding of the molecular basis of β-cell dysfunction in diabetes.

    1. Cell Biology
    Weihua Wang, Junqiao Xing ... Zhangfeng Hu
    Research Article

    Existence of cilia in the last eukaryotic common ancestor raises a fundamental question in biology: how the transcriptional regulation of ciliogenesis has evolved? One conceptual answer to this question is by an ancient transcription factor regulating ciliary gene expression in both uni- and multicellular organisms, but examples of such transcription factors in eukaryotes are lacking. Previously, we showed that an ancient transcription factor X chromosome-associated protein 5 (Xap5) is required for flagellar assembly in Chlamydomonas. Here, we show that Xap5 and Xap5-like (Xap5l) are two conserved pairs of antagonistic transcription regulators that control ciliary transcriptional programs during spermatogenesis. Male mice lacking either Xap5 or Xap5l display infertility, as a result of meiotic prophase arrest and sperm flagella malformation, respectively. Mechanistically, Xap5 positively regulates the ciliary gene expression by activating the key regulators including Foxj1 and Rfx families during the early stage of spermatogenesis. In contrast, Xap5l negatively regulates the expression of ciliary genes via repressing these ciliary transcription factors during the spermiogenesis stage. Our results provide new insights into the mechanisms by which temporal and spatial transcription regulators are coordinated to control ciliary transcriptional programs during spermatogenesis.