Folding behavior of a T-shaped, ribosome-binding translation enhancer implicated in a wide-spread conformational switch

  1. My-Tra Le  Is a corresponding author
  2. Wojciech K Kasprzak
  3. Taejin Kim
  4. Feng Gao
  5. Megan YL Young
  6. Xuefeng Yuan
  7. Bruce A Shapiro
  8. Joonil Seog
  9. Anne E Simon  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Maryland, United States
  2. Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc., United States
  3. National Cancer Institute, United States
  4. College of Plant Protection, Shandong Agricultural University, China

Abstract

Turnip crinkle virus contains a T-shaped, ribosome-binding, translation enhancer (TSS) in its 3'UTR that serves as a hub for interactions throughout the region. The viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) causes the TSS/surrounding region to undergo a conformational shift postulated to inhibit translation. Using optical tweezers (OT) and steered molecular dynamic simulations (SMD), we found that the unusual stability of pseudoknotted element H4a/Ψ3 required five upstream adenylates, and H4a/Ψ3 was necessary for cooperative association of two other hairpins (H5/H4b) in Mg2+. SMD recapitulated the TSS unfolding order in the absence of Mg2+, showed dependence of the resistance to pulling on the 3D orientation and gave structural insights into the measured contour lengths of the TSS structure elements. Adenylate mutations eliminated one-site RdRp binding to the 3'UTR, suggesting that RdRp binding to the adenylates disrupts H4a/Ψ3, leading to loss of H5/H4b interaction and promoting a conformational switch interrupting translation and promoting replication.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. My-Tra Le

    Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, University of Maryland, College Park, United States
    For correspondence
    my.letra@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Wojciech K Kasprzak

    Basic Science Program, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc., Frederick, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Taejin Kim

    RNA Biology Laboratory, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Feng Gao

    Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, University of Maryland, College Pak, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Megan YL Young

    Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, University of Maryland, College Park, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Xuefeng Yuan

    Department of Plant Pathology, College of Plant Protection, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Bruce A Shapiro

    RNA Biology Laboratory, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Joonil Seog

    Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Anne E Simon

    Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, University of Maryland, College Park, United States
    For correspondence
    simona@umd.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6121-0704

Funding

National Science Foundation (MCB-1411836)

  • My-Tra Le
  • Feng Gao
  • Megan YL Young
  • Xuefeng Yuan
  • Anne E Simon

National Institutes of Health (R21AI117882-01)

  • My-Tra Le
  • Feng Gao
  • Anne E Simon

National Cancer Institute (Intramural)

  • Wojciech K Kasprzak
  • Taejin Kim
  • Bruce A Shapiro

National Institutes of Health (T32GM080201)

  • Megan YL Young

National Institutes of Health (2T32AI051967-06A1)

  • Megan YL Young
  • Anne E Simon

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2017, Le et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,087
    views
  • 241
    downloads
  • 14
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. My-Tra Le
  2. Wojciech K Kasprzak
  3. Taejin Kim
  4. Feng Gao
  5. Megan YL Young
  6. Xuefeng Yuan
  7. Bruce A Shapiro
  8. Joonil Seog
  9. Anne E Simon
(2017)
Folding behavior of a T-shaped, ribosome-binding translation enhancer implicated in a wide-spread conformational switch
eLife 6:e22883.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.22883

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.22883

Further reading

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Joseph Clayton, Aarion Romany ... Jana Shen
    Research Article

    Aberrant signaling of BRAFV600E is a major cancer driver. Current FDA-approved RAF inhibitors selectively inhibit the monomeric BRAFV600E and suffer from tumor resistance. Recently, dimer-selective and equipotent RAF inhibitors have been developed; however, the mechanism of dimer selectivity is poorly understood. Here, we report extensive molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of the monomeric and dimeric BRAFV600E in the apo form or in complex with one or two dimer-selective (PHI1) or equipotent (LY3009120) inhibitor(s). The simulations uncovered the unprecedented details of the remarkable allostery in BRAFV600E dimerization and inhibitor binding. Specifically, dimerization retrains and shifts the αC helix inward and increases the flexibility of the DFG motif; dimer compatibility is due to the promotion of the αC-in conformation, which is stabilized by a hydrogen bond formation between the inhibitor and the αC Glu501. A more stable hydrogen bond further restrains and shifts the αC helix inward, which incurs a larger entropic penalty that disfavors monomer binding. This mechanism led us to propose an empirical way based on the co-crystal structure to assess the dimer selectivity of a BRAFV600E inhibitor. Simulations also revealed that the positive cooperativity of PHI1 is due to its ability to preorganize the αC and DFG conformation in the opposite protomer, priming it for binding the second inhibitor. The atomically detailed view of the interplay between BRAF dimerization and inhibitor allostery as well as cooperativity has implications for understanding kinase signaling and contributes to the design of protomer selective RAF inhibitors.

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Kazi A Hossain, Lukasz Nierzwicki ... Giulia Palermo
    Research Article

    xCas9 is an evolved variant of the CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing system, engineered to improve specificity and reduce undesired off-target effects. How xCas9 expands the DNA targeting capability of Cas9 by recognising a series of alternative protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) sequences while ignoring others is unknown. Here, we elucidate the molecular mechanism underlying xCas9’s expanded PAM recognition and provide critical insights for expanding DNA targeting. We demonstrate that while wild-type Cas9 enforces stringent guanine selection through the rigidity of its interacting arginine dyad, xCas9 introduces flexibility in R1335, enabling selective recognition of specific PAM sequences. This increased flexibility confers a pronounced entropic preference, which also improves recognition of the canonical TGG PAM. Furthermore, xCas9 enhances DNA binding to alternative PAM sequences during the early evolution cycles, while favouring binding to the canonical PAM in the final evolution cycle. This dual functionality highlights how xCas9 broadens PAM recognition and underscores the importance of fine-tuning the flexibility of the PAM-interacting cleft as a key strategy for expanding the DNA targeting potential of CRISPR-Cas systems. These findings deepen our understanding of DNA recognition in xCas9 and may apply to other CRISPR-Cas systems with similar PAM recognition requirements.