Bacterial flagella grow through an injection-diffusion mechanism

  1. Thibaud T Renault
  2. Anthony O Abraham
  3. Tobias Bergmiller
  4. Guillaume Paradis
  5. Simon Rainville
  6. Emmanuelle Charpentier
  7. Călin C Guet
  8. Yuhai Tu
  9. Keiichi Namba
  10. James P Keener  Is a corresponding author
  11. Tohru Minamino
  12. Marc Erhardt  Is a corresponding author
  1. Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Germany
  2. Osaka University, Japan
  3. Institute of Science and Technology Austria, Austria
  4. Laval University, Canada
  5. Max Planck Institute for Infection Biology, Germany
  6. IBM Thomas J. Watson Research Center, United States
  7. University of Utah, United States

Abstract

The bacterial flagellum is a self-assembling nanomachine. The external flagellar filament, several times longer than a bacterial cell body, is made of a few tens of thousands subunits of a single protein: flagellin. A fundamental problem concerns the molecular mechanism of how the flagellum grows outside the cell, where no discernible energy source is available. Here, we monitored the dynamic assembly of individual flagella using in situ labelling and real-time immunostaining of elongating flagellar filaments. We report that the rate of flagellum growth, initially ∼1,700 amino acids per second, decreases with length and that the previously proposed chain mechanism does not contribute to the filament elongation dynamics. Inhibition of the proton motive force-dependent export apparatus revealed a major contribution of substrate injection in driving filament elongation. The combination of experimental and mathematical evidence demonstrates that a simple, injection-diffusion mechanism controls bacterial flagella growth outside the cell.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Thibaud T Renault

    Junior Research Group Infection Biology of Salmonella, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Braunschweig, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Anthony O Abraham

    Graduate School of Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8710-1351
  3. Tobias Bergmiller

    Institute of Science and Technology Austria, Vienna, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Guillaume Paradis

    Department of Physics, Engineering Physics and Optics, Laval University, Quebec City, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Simon Rainville

    Department of Physics, Engineering Physics and Optics, Laval University, Quebec City, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Emmanuelle Charpentier

    Max Planck Institute for Infection Biology, Berlin, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Călin C Guet

    Institute of Science and Technology Austria, Klosterneuburg, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6220-2052
  8. Yuhai Tu

    IBM Thomas J. Watson Research Center, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Keiichi Namba

    Graduate School of Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University, Suita, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. James P Keener

    Department of Mathematics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    For correspondence
    keener@math.utah.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Tohru Minamino

    Graduate School of Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University, Suita, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Marc Erhardt

    Junior Research Group Infection Biology of Salmonella, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Braunschweig, Germany
    For correspondence
    marc.erhardt@helmholtz-hzi.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6292-619X

Funding

Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft (VH-NG-932)

  • Marc Erhardt

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (15H01640)

  • Tohru Minamino

Max-Planck-Gesellschaft

  • Emmanuelle Charpentier

National Institutes of Health (R01GM081747)

  • Yuhai Tu

European Commission (334030)

  • Marc Erhardt

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (25000013)

  • Keiichi Namba

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

  • Simon Rainville

Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung

  • Thibaud T Renault

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (26293097)

  • Tohru Minamino

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (24117004)

  • Tohru Minamino

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2017, Renault et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 6,409
    views
  • 1,152
    downloads
  • 80
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Thibaud T Renault
  2. Anthony O Abraham
  3. Tobias Bergmiller
  4. Guillaume Paradis
  5. Simon Rainville
  6. Emmanuelle Charpentier
  7. Călin C Guet
  8. Yuhai Tu
  9. Keiichi Namba
  10. James P Keener
  11. Tohru Minamino
  12. Marc Erhardt
(2017)
Bacterial flagella grow through an injection-diffusion mechanism
eLife 6:e23136.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.23136

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.23136

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Yamato Niitani, Kohei Matsuzaki ... Michio Tomishige
    Research Article

    The two identical motor domains (heads) of dimeric kinesin-1 move in a hand-over-hand process along a microtubule, coordinating their ATPase cycles such that each ATP hydrolysis is tightly coupled to a step and enabling the motor to take many steps without dissociating. The neck linker, a structural element that connects the two heads, has been shown to be essential for head–head coordination; however, which kinetic step(s) in the chemomechanical cycle is ‘gated’ by the neck linker remains unresolved. Here, we employed pre-steady-state kinetics and single-molecule assays to investigate how the neck-linker conformation affects kinesin’s motility cycle. We show that the backward-pointing configuration of the neck linker in the front kinesin head confers higher affinity for microtubule, but does not change ATP binding and dissociation rates. In contrast, the forward-pointing configuration of the neck linker in the rear kinesin head decreases the ATP dissociation rate but has little effect on microtubule dissociation. In combination, these conformation-specific effects of the neck linker favor ATP hydrolysis and dissociation of the rear head prior to microtubule detachment of the front head, thereby providing a kinetic explanation for the coordinated walking mechanism of dimeric kinesin.

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Christopher T Schafer, Raymond F Pauszek III ... David P Millar
    Research Article

    The canonical chemokine receptor CXCR4 and atypical receptor ACKR3 both respond to CXCL12 but induce different effector responses to regulate cell migration. While CXCR4 couples to G proteins and directly promotes cell migration, ACKR3 is G-protein-independent and scavenges CXCL12 to regulate extracellular chemokine levels and maintain CXCR4 responsiveness, thereby indirectly influencing migration. The receptors also have distinct activation requirements. CXCR4 only responds to wild-type CXCL12 and is sensitive to mutation of the chemokine. By contrast, ACKR3 recruits GPCR kinases (GRKs) and β-arrestins and promiscuously responds to CXCL12, CXCL12 variants, other peptides and proteins, and is relatively insensitive to mutation. To investigate the role of conformational dynamics in the distinct pharmacological behaviors of CXCR4 and ACKR3, we employed single-molecule FRET to track discrete conformational states of the receptors in real-time. The data revealed that apo-CXCR4 preferentially populates a high-FRET inactive state, while apo-ACKR3 shows little conformational preference and high transition probabilities among multiple inactive, intermediate and active conformations, consistent with its propensity for activation. Multiple active-like ACKR3 conformations are populated in response to agonists, compared to the single CXCR4 active-state. This and the markedly different conformational landscapes of the receptors suggest that activation of ACKR3 may be achieved by a broader distribution of conformational states than CXCR4. Much of the conformational heterogeneity of ACKR3 is linked to a single residue that differs between ACKR3 and CXCR4. The dynamic properties of ACKR3 may underly its inability to form productive interactions with G proteins that would drive canonical GPCR signaling.