A chloroplast retrograde signal, 3'-phosphoadenosine 5'-phosphate, acts as a secondary messenger in abscisic acid signaling in stomatal closure and germination

  1. Wannarat Pornsiriwong
  2. Gonzalo M Estavillo
  3. Kai Xun Chan
  4. Estee E Tee
  5. Diep Ganguly
  6. Peter A Crisp
  7. Su Yin Phua
  8. Chenchen Zhao
  9. Jiaen Qiu
  10. Jiyoung Park
  11. Miing Tiem Yong
  12. Nazia Nisar
  13. Arun Kumar Yadav
  14. Benjamin Schwessinger
  15. John Rathjen
  16. Christopher I Cazzonelli
  17. Philippa B Wilson
  18. Matthew Gilliham
  19. Zhong-Hua Chen
  20. Barry J Pogson  Is a corresponding author
  1. Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Thailand
  2. CSIRO Agriculture, Australia
  3. The Australian National University, Australia
  4. Western Sydney University, Australia
  5. University of Adelaide, Australia
  6. University of California, San Diego, United States

Abstract

Organelle-nuclear retrograde signaling regulates gene expression, but its roles in specialized cells and integration with hormonal signaling remain enigmatic. Here we show that the SAL1-PAP (3′-phosphoadenosine 5′- phosphate) retrograde pathway interacts with abscisic acid (ABA) signaling to regulate stomatal closure and seed germination in Arabidopsis. Genetically or exogenously manipulating PAP bypasses the canonical signaling components ABA Insensitive 1 (ABI1) and Open Stomata 1 (OST1); priming an alternative pathway that restores ABA-responsive gene expression, ROS bursts, ion channel function, stomatal closure and drought tolerance in ost1-2. PAP also inhibits wild type and abi1-1 seed germination by enhancing ABA sensitivity. PAP-XRN signaling interacts with ABA, ROS and Ca2+; up-regulating multiple ABA signaling components, including lowly-expressed Calcium Dependent Protein Kinases (CDPKs) capable of activating the anion channel SLAC1. Thus, PAP exhibits many secondary messenger attributes and exemplifies how retrograde signals can have broader roles in hormone signaling, allowing chloroplasts to fine-tune physiological responses.

Data availability

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Wannarat Pornsiriwong

    Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Gonzalo M Estavillo

    CSIRO Agriculture, Canberra, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Kai Xun Chan

    ARC Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, The Australian National University, Acton, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Estee E Tee

    ARC Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, The Australian National University, Acton, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Diep Ganguly

    ARC Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, The Australian National University, Acton, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Peter A Crisp

    ARC Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, The Australian National University, Acton, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3655-0130
  7. Su Yin Phua

    ARC Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, The Australian National University, Acton, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Chenchen Zhao

    School of Science and Health, Western Sydney University, Richmond, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Jiaen Qiu

    ARC Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Jiyoung Park

    Division of Biological Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Miing Tiem Yong

    School of Science and Health, Western Sydney University, Richmond, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Nazia Nisar

    ARC Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, The Australian National University, Acton, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Arun Kumar Yadav

    ARC Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, The Australian National University, Acton, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Benjamin Schwessinger

    Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, Acton, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. John Rathjen

    Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, Acton, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Christopher I Cazzonelli

    Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Richmond, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Philippa B Wilson

    ARC Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, The Australian National University, Acton, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  18. Matthew Gilliham

    ARC Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0666-3078
  19. Zhong-Hua Chen

    School of Science and Health, Western Sydney University, Richmond, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  20. Barry J Pogson

    ARC Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, The Australian National University, Acton, Australia
    For correspondence
    barry.pogson@anu.edu.au
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1869-2423

Funding

Australian Research Council (CE140100008)

  • Wannarat Pornsiriwong
  • Gonzalo M Estavillo
  • Kai Xun Chan
  • Estee E Tee
  • Diep Ganguly
  • Peter A Crisp
  • Su Yin Phua
  • Jiaen Qiu
  • Nazia Nisar
  • Arun Kumar Yadav
  • Christopher I Cazzonelli
  • Philippa B Wilson
  • Matthew Gilliham

National Institutes of Health (GM060396)

  • Jiyoung Park

Human Frontier Science Program

  • Jiyoung Park

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Dominique C Bergmann, Stanford University/HHMI, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experimentation involving Xenopus oocytes were performed in strict accordance to the University of Adelaide ethics committee guidelines. All Xenopus experiments received ethical approval (Animal Ethics Application # S-2014-192, University of Adelaide).

Version history

  1. Received: November 16, 2016
  2. Accepted: March 16, 2017
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: March 21, 2017 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: April 26, 2017 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record updated: May 5, 2017 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2017, Pornsiriwong et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,300
    views
  • 1,269
    downloads
  • 117
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Wannarat Pornsiriwong
  2. Gonzalo M Estavillo
  3. Kai Xun Chan
  4. Estee E Tee
  5. Diep Ganguly
  6. Peter A Crisp
  7. Su Yin Phua
  8. Chenchen Zhao
  9. Jiaen Qiu
  10. Jiyoung Park
  11. Miing Tiem Yong
  12. Nazia Nisar
  13. Arun Kumar Yadav
  14. Benjamin Schwessinger
  15. John Rathjen
  16. Christopher I Cazzonelli
  17. Philippa B Wilson
  18. Matthew Gilliham
  19. Zhong-Hua Chen
  20. Barry J Pogson
(2017)
A chloroplast retrograde signal, 3'-phosphoadenosine 5'-phosphate, acts as a secondary messenger in abscisic acid signaling in stomatal closure and germination
eLife 6:e23361.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.23361

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.23361

Further reading

    1. Plant Biology
    Yuanyuan Bu, Xingye Dong ... Shenkui Liu
    Research Article

    Urea is intensively utilized as a nitrogen fertilizer in agriculture, originating either from root uptake or from catabolism of arginine by arginase. Despite its extensive use, the underlying physiological mechanisms of urea, particularly its adverse effects on seed germination and seedling growth under salt stress remains unclear. In this study, we demonstrate that salt stress induces excessive hydrolysis of arginine-derived urea, leading to an increase in cytoplasmic pH within seed radical cells, which, in turn, triggers salt-induced inhibition of seed germination (SISG) and hampers seedling growth. Our findings challenge the long-held belief that ammonium accumulation and toxicity are the primary causes of SISG, offering a novel perspective on the mechanism underlying these processes. This study provides significant insights into the physiological impact of urea hydrolysis under salt stress, contributing to a better understanding of SISG.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Plant Biology
    Henning Mühlenbeck, Yuko Tsutsui ... Cyril Zipfel
    Research Article

    Transmembrane signaling by plant receptor kinases (RKs) has long been thought to involve reciprocal trans-phosphorylation of their intracellular kinase domains. The fact that many of these are pseudokinase domains, however, suggests that additional mechanisms must govern RK signaling activation. Non-catalytic signaling mechanisms of protein kinase domains have been described in metazoans, but information is scarce for plants. Recently, a non-catalytic function was reported for the leucine-rich repeat (LRR)-RK subfamily XIIa member EFR (elongation factor Tu receptor) and phosphorylation-dependent conformational changes were proposed to regulate signaling of RKs with non-RD kinase domains. Here, using EFR as a model, we describe a non-catalytic activation mechanism for LRR-RKs with non-RD kinase domains. EFR is an active kinase, but a kinase-dead variant retains the ability to enhance catalytic activity of its co-receptor kinase BAK1/SERK3 (brassinosteroid insensitive 1-associated kinase 1/somatic embryogenesis receptor kinase 3). Applying hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) analysis and designing homology-based intragenic suppressor mutations, we provide evidence that the EFR kinase domain must adopt its active conformation in order to activate BAK1 allosterically, likely by supporting αC-helix positioning in BAK1. Our results suggest a conformational toggle model for signaling, in which BAK1 first phosphorylates EFR in the activation loop to stabilize its active conformation, allowing EFR in turn to allosterically activate BAK1.