Longevity is impacted by growth hormone action during early postnatal period

  1. Liou Y Sun  Is a corresponding author
  2. Yimin Fang
  3. Amit Patki
  4. Jacob JE Koopman
  5. David B Allison
  6. Cristal Hill
  7. Michal M Masternak
  8. Justin Darcy
  9. Jian Wang
  10. Samuel McFadden
  11. Andrzej Bartke
  1. University of Alabama at Birmingham, United States
  2. Southern Illinois University, School of Medicine, United States
  3. Leiden University Medical Center, Netherlands
  4. College of Medicine, University of Central Florida, United States

Abstract

Life-long lack of growth hormone (GH) action can produce remarkable extension of longevity in mice. Here we report that GH treatment limited to a few weeks during development influences the lifespan of long-lived Ames dwarf and normal littermate control mice in a genotype and sex-specific manner. Studies in a separate cohort of Ames dwarf mice show that this short period of the GH exposure during early development produces persistent phenotypic, metabolic and molecular changes that are evident in late adult life. These effects may represent mechanisms responsible for reduced longevity of dwarf mice exposed to GH treatment early in life. Our data suggest that developmental programming of aging importantly contributes to (and perhaps explains) the well documented developmental origins of adult disease.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Liou Y Sun

    Department of Biology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, United States
    For correspondence
    leeosun@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9802-6780
  2. Yimin Fang

    Department of Internal Medicine, Southern Illinois University, School of Medicine, Springfield, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Amit Patki

    Department of Biostatistics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Jacob JE Koopman

    Section of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. David B Allison

    Department of Biology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Brimingham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Cristal Hill

    Department of Internal Medicine, Southern Illinois University, School of Medicine, Springfield, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Michal M Masternak

    Burnett School of Biomedical Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Central Florida, Orlando, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Justin Darcy

    Department of Internal Medicine, Southern Illinois University, School of Medicine, Springfield, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Jian Wang

    Department of Biology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Samuel McFadden

    Department of Internal Medicine, Southern Illinois University, School of Medicine, Springfield, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Andrzej Bartke

    Department of Internal Medicine, Southern Illinois University, School of Medicine, Springfield, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

National Institute on Aging

  • Liou Y Sun

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases

  • David B Allison

National Insitute on Aging

  • Andrzej Bartke

National Insitute on Aging

  • David B Allison

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Andrew Dillin, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California, Berkeley, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols (IACUC-20292) of the University of Alabama and (#178-020-001) of SIU school of medicine. The protocol was approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of the UAB and SIUSOM.

Version history

  1. Received: December 8, 2016
  2. Accepted: June 19, 2017
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: July 4, 2017 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: July 18, 2017 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2017, Sun et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,569
    views
  • 442
    downloads
  • 48
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Liou Y Sun
  2. Yimin Fang
  3. Amit Patki
  4. Jacob JE Koopman
  5. David B Allison
  6. Cristal Hill
  7. Michal M Masternak
  8. Justin Darcy
  9. Jian Wang
  10. Samuel McFadden
  11. Andrzej Bartke
(2017)
Longevity is impacted by growth hormone action during early postnatal period
eLife 6:e24059.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.24059

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.24059

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    Edgar M Pera, Josefine Nilsson-De Moura ... Ivana Milas
    Research Article

    We previously showed that SerpinE2 and the serine protease HtrA1 modulate fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling in germ layer specification and head-to-tail development of Xenopus embryos. Here, we present an extracellular proteolytic mechanism involving this serpin-protease system in the developing neural crest (NC). Knockdown of SerpinE2 by injected antisense morpholino oligonucleotides did not affect the specification of NC progenitors but instead inhibited the migration of NC cells, causing defects in dorsal fin, melanocyte, and craniofacial cartilage formation. Similarly, overexpression of the HtrA1 protease impaired NC cell migration and the formation of NC-derived structures. The phenotype of SerpinE2 knockdown was overcome by concomitant downregulation of HtrA1, indicating that SerpinE2 stimulates NC migration by inhibiting endogenous HtrA1 activity. SerpinE2 binds to HtrA1, and the HtrA1 protease triggers degradation of the cell surface proteoglycan Syndecan-4 (Sdc4). Microinjection of Sdc4 mRNA partially rescued NC migration defects induced by both HtrA1 upregulation and SerpinE2 downregulation. These epistatic experiments suggest a proteolytic pathway by a double inhibition mechanism:

    SerpinE2 ┤HtrA1 protease ┤Syndecan-4 → NC cell migration.

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Kristine B Walhovd, Stine K Krogsrud ... Didac Vidal-Pineiro
    Research Article

    Human fetal development has been associated with brain health at later stages. It is unknown whether growth in utero, as indexed by birth weight (BW), relates consistently to lifespan brain characteristics and changes, and to what extent these influences are of a genetic or environmental nature. Here we show remarkably stable and lifelong positive associations between BW and cortical surface area and volume across and within developmental, aging and lifespan longitudinal samples (N = 5794, 4–82 y of age, w/386 monozygotic twins, followed for up to 8.3 y w/12,088 brain MRIs). In contrast, no consistent effect of BW on brain changes was observed. Partly environmental effects were indicated by analysis of twin BW discordance. In conclusion, the influence of prenatal growth on cortical topography is stable and reliable through the lifespan. This early-life factor appears to influence the brain by association of brain reserve, rather than brain maintenance. Thus, fetal influences appear omnipresent in the spacetime of the human brain throughout the human lifespan. Optimizing fetal growth may increase brain reserve for life, also in aging.