(a) Shisa7 is closely related to the AMPAR auxiliary subunit Shisa6 and Shisa9, bearing a signal peptide (SP; 22 amino acids), an extracellular domain with conserved cysteine-rich motif, a single …
Sequence of DNA primers.
Primers were used for PCR experiments to detect the presence or absence of exon 4 in Shisa7, as well as for real-time PCR. The forward and reverse primers, as well as the size of the amplicon generated, are indicated.
(a) Quantitative PCR shows that the Shisa7 gene expression is specifically enriched within the brain (note the log2-scale), and is virtually absent in the pancreas (pooled from three adult mice). …
(a) Representation of Shisa7-null mouse generation: The Shisa7 locus around exon 1, encoding the N-terminal part of the Shisa7 protein including the start-site (ATG), with essential restriction …
Whole immunoblots are presented from which sections are included in Figure 1b–e, and Figure 1—figure supplement 2e. Numbers represent apparent molecular weights in kDa. Black dots indicate the …
(a) Peak-scaled example trace of whole-cell recordings from HEK293 cells expressing a homomeric GluA1-containing AMPAR channel in the absence (black) or presence (blue) of Shisa7. Currents were …
(a) Peak-scaled example traces of whole-cell recording from HEK293 cells expressing homomeric GluA1-containing AMPAR channels in the absence (black) or presence (blue) of Shisa7. Currents were …
(a) Example traces of mEPSC recordings from CA1 pyramidal cells of Shisa7 KO animals and WT littermates. (b,c) Superimposed spontaneous synaptic currents (b), and average synaptic currents (c) of Shi…
(a,b) Recorded pyramidal cells in the CA1 hippocampal region showed comparable membrane properties for Shisa7 KO and WT mice; membrane resistance (a) and resting membrane potential (b).
(a) Immunoblots of hippocampal synaptic membrane fractions from WT and Shisa7 KO mice (n = 4–5 each) do not reveal differences in abundance of AMPAR (MWU tests, GluA1, p=0.421; GluA2, p=1.000), …
(a) Immunoblots of hippocampal synaptic membrane fractions from WT and Shisa7 KO mice (n = 4–5 each) do not reveal differences in abundance of AMPAR, NMDAR, PSD-95, TARP γ−8, Shisa9 or Shisa6, when …
The representative protein bands and corresponding loading controls are shown.
(a) Superimposed example traces of whole-cell recordings voltage clamped at –70 mV from CA1 pyramidal neurons of Shisa7 KO animals (red) and WT littermates (grey) in response to 50 Hz stimulation of …
(a,b) Correlation analysis of stimulus current injected vs. EPSP amplitude (Ln-transformed data) for AMPAR (a; nA) and NMDAR (b; pA) obtained showed no difference for genotype (a, WT n = 56 data …
(a) Normalized EPSP amplitude over the time course of the LTP experiments shows a clear genotype effect (WT, n = 5 slices, n = 5 mice; Shisa7 KO, n = 6 slices, n = 6 mice). The arrow indicates the …
(a) Normalized EPSP slope over the time course of the LTP experiments shows a clear genotype effect, with a reduction in Shisa7 KO, similar as observed for amplitude (cf. Figure 5)(WT, n = 5 slices, …
(a) Normalized EPSP amplitude (WT, n = 5 slices, n = 5 mice; Shisa7 KO, n = 6 slices, n = 6 mice mind that the last data point contains n = 5) binned during 5 minute intervals early after LTP …
(a,c) Experimental set-up of measuring contextual fear conditioning memory (a,c), in which mice received a foot shock (US) in a specific environment (CS), and freezing was assessed upon re-exposure …
In addition to the set-ups (a,c,e) and average freezing data of Figure 7, the individual data are shown for short term fear memory (nWT = 8, nKO = 7; b), long term fear memory (nWT = 9 nKO = 10; d), …
(a) Mean velocity in the 3 minutes prior to shock (left), or during the 2 s 0.7 mA shock (right) was not different between Shisa7 KO (n = 10) and WT littermates (n = 9), indicating no effect on …
The effect is depicted for different AMPAR kinetic parameters measured in heterologous expression systems (HEK293 cells or oocytes; open ovals), or ex vivo in hippocampal slices (filled ovals). …
Shisa7 complexes were immunoprecipitated from the hippocampi of Shisa7 WT and KO animals (DDM-extracted crude synaptic membranes; n = 3 IPs per genotype) and subjected to mass spectrometric …
Gene name | Uniprot recommendedprotein name(s) | Uniprot ID | PDZ-domains | Number of unique peptides | LFQ intensity | Average KO LFQ intensity | Average WT LFQ intensity | Average KO/WT LFQ intensity | Average WT/KO LFQ intensity | T-test significant FDR0.01 = ++ DR0.05 = + | T-test q-value | Percent cover-age | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KO1 | KO2 | KO3 | WT1 | WT2 | WT3 | KO1 | KO2 | KO3 | WT1 | WT2 | WT3 | |||||||||||
Shisa7 | Protein Shisa-7 | Q8C3Q5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 17 | 18 | 16 | 865 | 873 | 1750 | 319820 | 305190 | 346730 | 1163 | 323913 | 0.4% | 278.58 | ++ | 0.0000 | 39.2 |
Protein Shisa-7:Exon4-specificpeptideNLYNTMKPSNLDNLHYNVNSPK | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
Gria1 | Glutamatereceptor 1 | P23818 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 12 | 12 | 5921 | 0 | 3217 | 17828 | 52304 | 54212 | 4569 | 41448 | 11.0% | 9.07 | ++ | 0.0000 | 22.8 |
Gria2 | Glutamatereceptor 2 | P23819 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 2743 | 0 | 0 | 104860 | 101430 | 93097 | 2743 | 99796 | 2.7% | 36.39 | ++ | 0.0000 | 36.4 |
Gria3 | Glutamatereceptor 3 | Q9Z2W9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6529 | 7068 | 10102 | 0 | 7900 | 0.0% | NaN | ++ | 0.0000 | 17.7 |
Cacng8 | Voltage-dependentcalciumchannelgamma-8subunit;TARPgamma-8 | Q8VHW2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 4023 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3962 | 4023 | 3962 | 101.5% | 0.98 | - | N/A | 30.5 |
Olfm1 | Noelin | O88998 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1076 | 0 | 0 | 1004 | 779 | 1076 | 892 | 120.6% | 0.83 | - | N/A | 7.0 |
Prrt1 | Proline-richtransmem-braneprotein 1;SynDIG4 | O35449 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 969 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 969 | 0.0% | NaN | - | N/A | 7.2 |
Prrt2 | Proline-richtransmem-braneprotein 2 | E9PUL5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 333 | 0 | 318 | 0 | 202 | 333 | 260 | 127.9% | 0.78 | - | N/A | 3.8 |
Rap2b | Ras-relatedproteinRap-2b | P61226 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2588 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2588 | 0 | NaN | 0.00 | - | N/A | 12.0 |
Shisa6 | Proteinshisa-6homolog | Q3UH99 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2666 | 3580 | 2136 | 0 | 2794 | 0.0% | NaN | + | 0.0306 | 9.9 |
Dlg1 | Disks largehomolog 1;SAP97 | Q811D0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2126 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2126 | 0.0% | NaN | - | N/A | 4.4 |
Dlg3 | Disks largehomolog 3;SAP102 | P70175 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2441 | 0 | 0 | 2441 | 0.0% | NaN | - | N/A | 4.8 |
Dlg4 | Disks largehomolog 4;PSD95 | Q62108 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11835 | 13410 | 9284 | 0 | 11510 | 0.0% | NaN | ++ | 0.0000 | 21.7 |
Magi2 | Membrane-associatedguanylatekinase,WW and PDZdomain-containingprotein 2 | Q9WVQ1 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1558 | 0 | 0 | 1558 | 0.0% | NaN | - | N/A | 1.6 |
Maxquant analysis of hippocampal Shisa7 immunoprecipitation experiments, as detailed in the Materials and methods section.
The Maxquant ‘proteinGroups.txt’ output file was supplemented with ‘LFQ intensity _ Average KO’, ‘LFQ intensity _ Average WT’, and the ‘KO/WT’ and ‘WT/KO’ ratios thereof.
Statistical analysis of hippocampal Shisa7 immunoprecipitation data, as detailed in the Materials and methods section.
Tab 1: In summary, the Maxquant ‘proteinGroups.txt’ output file was imported into Perseus, and processed in the following manner: (1) Removal of ‘Reverse’, ‘Potential contaminant’, and ‘Only identified by site’ protein groups; (2) Log(2) transformation of all LFQ intensity values; (3) Removal of protein groups with less than three valid ‘Log(2) LFQ intensity’ values in either the WT or KO groups; (4) Imputation of missing values (8.6% of the population) from a normal distribution (width 0.3, down shift 1.8, whole matrix); (5) Performing a Student's t-test followed by permutation-based FDR analysis (S0 = 1, FDR = 0.01, 2500 permutations). Tab 2: Visualization of the data by means of Histogram and Vulcanoplot is presented in the additional sheets. Tab 3: Distribution of LFQ intensities after replacing missing values from a normal distribution. The imputed value distribution is depicted in red.
The functional contribution of Shisa family members (Shisa9, Shisa6, Shisa7) and TARP γ−8 on AMPAR complexes are listed for the respective in vitro, ex/in vivo methods used.
In vitro data on TARP γ−8 are from Milstein et al. (2007). The Shisa9 and TARP γ−8 ex/in vivo data originate from Khodosevich et al. (2014), in which experiments were performed using WT, KO and overexpression conditions in the DG, which is regionally more appropriate for Shisa9 than overexpression in CA1 (von Engelhardt et al., 2010), and from the CA1 for TARP γ−8 KO (Rouach et al., 2005). The Shisa6 ex/in vivo data stem from WT vs. KO comparisons in CA1 pyramidal cells activated by (electrically-evoked) CA3 input (Schaffer collaterals (Klaassen et al., 2016)), similar as used for Shisa7 (bold). NA: Not applicable, not measured.