Pharmacological evidence for a metabotropic glutamate receptor heterodimer in neuronal cells

  1. David Moreno Delgado
  2. Thor C Møller
  3. Jeanne Ster
  4. Jesús Giraldo
  5. Damien Maurel
  6. Xavier Rovira
  7. Pauline Scholler
  8. Jurrian M Zwier
  9. Julie Perroy
  10. Thierry Durroux
  11. Eric Trinquet
  12. Laurent Prezeau
  13. Philippe Rondard
  14. Jean-Philippe Pin  Is a corresponding author
  1. CNRS, INSERM, Univ Montpellier, France
  2. CNRS, INSERM, Université de Montpellier, France
  3. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain
  4. Cisbio bioassays, France

Abstract

Metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) are mandatory dimers playing important roles in regulating CNS function. Although assumed to form exclusive homodimers, sixteen possible heterodimeric mGluRs have been proposed but their existence in native cells remains elusive. Here we set up two assays to specifically identify the pharmacological properties of rat mGlu heterodimers composed of mGlu2 and 4 subunits. We used either a heterodimer specific conformational LRET-based biosensor, or a system that guarantees the cell surface targeting of the heterodimer only. We identified mGlu2-4 specific pharmacological fingerprints that were also observed in a neuronal cell line and in lateral perforant path terminals naturally expressing mGlu2 and mGlu4. These results bring strong evidence for the existence of mGlu2-4 heterodimers in native cells. In addition to reporting a general approach to characterize heterodimeric mGluRs, our study opens new avenues to understanding the pathophysiological roles of mGlu heterodimers.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. David Moreno Delgado

    Institut de Genomique Fonctionnelle, CNRS, INSERM, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Thor C Møller

    Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, CNRS, INSERM, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Jeanne Ster

    Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, CNRS, INSERM, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Jesús Giraldo

    Laboratory of Molecular Neuropharmacology and Bioinformatics, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7082-4695
  5. Damien Maurel

    Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, CNRS, INSERM, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Xavier Rovira

    Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, CNRS, INSERM, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9764-9927
  7. Pauline Scholler

    Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, CNRS, INSERM, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Jurrian M Zwier

    Cisbio bioassays, Codolet, France
    Competing interests
    Jurrian M Zwier, Dr Zwier is working at Cisbio Bioassays, a company selling HTRF tools.
  9. Julie Perroy

    Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, CNRS, INSERM, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Thierry Durroux

    Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, CNRS, INSERM, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Eric Trinquet

    Cisbio bioassays, Codolet, France
    Competing interests
    Eric Trinquet, He is head of R&D at CisBio Bioassays.
  12. Laurent Prezeau

    Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, CNRS, INSERM, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Philippe Rondard

    Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, CNRS, INSERM, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  14. Jean-Philippe Pin

    Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, CNRS, INSERM, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
    For correspondence
    jppin@igf.cnrs.fr
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1423-345X

Funding

Fondation recherche médicale DEQ20130326522 (DEQ20130326522)

  • Jean-Philippe Pin

CisBio bioassays (Laboratoire Collaboratif)

  • Jean-Philippe Pin

ERA-NET Neuron (PCIN-2013-018-C03-02)

  • Jesús Giraldo

ERA-NET Neuron (SAF2014-58396-R)

  • Jesús Giraldo

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-09-BIOT-018)

  • Eric Trinquet
  • Philippe Rondard
  • Jean-Philippe Pin

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2017, Moreno Delgado et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,973
    views
  • 503
    downloads
  • 73
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. David Moreno Delgado
  2. Thor C Møller
  3. Jeanne Ster
  4. Jesús Giraldo
  5. Damien Maurel
  6. Xavier Rovira
  7. Pauline Scholler
  8. Jurrian M Zwier
  9. Julie Perroy
  10. Thierry Durroux
  11. Eric Trinquet
  12. Laurent Prezeau
  13. Philippe Rondard
  14. Jean-Philippe Pin
(2017)
Pharmacological evidence for a metabotropic glutamate receptor heterodimer in neuronal cells
eLife 6:e25233.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25233

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25233

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Surya Bansi Singh, Shatruhan Singh Rajput ... Deepa Subramanyam
    Research Article Updated

    Aggregation of mutant forms of Huntingtin is the underlying feature of neurodegeneration observed in Huntington’s disorder. In addition to neurons, cellular processes in non-neuronal cell types are also shown to be affected. Cells expressing neurodegeneration–associated mutant proteins show altered uptake of ligands, suggestive of impaired endocytosis, in a manner as yet unknown. Using live cell imaging, we show that clathrin-mediated endocytosis (CME) is affected in Drosophila hemocytes and mammalian cells containing Huntingtin aggregates. This is also accompanied by alterations in the organization of the actin cytoskeleton resulting in increased cellular stiffness. Further, we find that Huntingtin aggregates sequester actin and actin-modifying proteins. Overexpression of Hip1 or Arp3 (actin-interacting proteins) could restore CME and cellular stiffness in cells containing Huntingtin aggregates. Neurodegeneration driven by pathogenic Huntingtin was also rescued upon overexpression of either Hip1 or Arp3 in Drosophila. Examination of other pathogenic aggregates revealed that TDP-43 also displayed defective CME, altered actin organization and increased stiffness, similar to pathogenic Huntingtin. Together, our results point to an intimate connection between dysfunctional CME, actin misorganization and increased cellular stiffness caused by alteration in the local intracellular environment by pathogenic aggregates.

    1. Cell Biology
    Chenlu Kang, Pengcheng Chen ... Congying Wu
    Research Article

    Cell migration towards stiff substrates has been coined as durotaxis and implicated in development, wound healing, and cancer, where complex interplays between immune and non-immune cells are present. Compared to the emerging mechanisms underlying the strongly adhesive mesenchymal durotaxis, little is known about whether immune cells - migrating in amoeboid mode - could follow mechanical cues. Here, we develop an imaging-based confined migration device with a stiffness gradient. By tracking live cell trajectory and analyzing the directionality of T cells and neutrophils, we observe that amoeboid cells can durotax. We further delineate the underlying mechanism to involve non-muscle myosin IIA (NMIIA) polarization towards the soft-matrix-side but may not require differential actin flow up- or down-stiffness gradient. Using the protista Dictyostelium, we demonstrate the evolutionary conservation of amoeboid durotaxis. Finally, these experimental phenomena are theoretically captured by an active gel model capable of mechanosensing. Collectively, these results may shed new lights on immune surveillance and recently identified confined migration of cancer cells, within the mechanically inhomogeneous tumor microenvironment or the inflamed fibrotic tissues.