Co-targeting the tumor endothelium and P-selectin-expressing glioblastoma cells leads to a remarkable therapeutic outcome

  1. Shiran Ferber
  2. Galia Tiram
  3. Ana Sousa-Herves
  4. Anat Eldar-Boock
  5. Adva Krivitsky
  6. Anna Scomparin
  7. Eilam Yeini
  8. Paula Ofek
  9. Dikla Ben-Shushan
  10. Laura Isabel Vossen
  11. Kai Licha
  12. Rachel Grossman
  13. Zvi Ram
  14. Jack Henkin
  15. Eytan Ruppin
  16. Noam Auslander
  17. Rainer Haag
  18. Marcelo Calderón
  19. Ronit Satchi-Fainaro  Is a corresponding author
  1. Tel Aviv University, Israel
  2. Freie Universität Berlin, Germany
  3. Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Israel
  4. Northwestern University, United States
  5. University of Maryland, United States

Abstract

Glioblastoma is a highly aggressive brain tumor. Current standard-of-care results in a marginal therapeutic outcome, partly due to acquirement of resistance and insufficient blood-brain barrier (BBB) penetration of chemotherapeutics. To circumvent these limitations, we conjugated the chemotherapy paclitaxel (PTX) to a dendritic polyglycerol sulfate (dPGS) nanocarrier. dPGS is able to cross the BBB, bind to P/L-selectins and accumulate selectively in intracranial tumors. We show that dPGS has dual targeting properties, as we found that P-selectin is not only expressed on tumor endothelium but also on glioblastoma cells. We delivered dPGS-PTX in combination with a peptidomimetic of the anti-angiogenic protein thrombospondin-1 (TSP-1 PM). This combination resulted in a remarkable synergistic anticancer effect on intracranial human and murine glioblastoma via induction of Fas and Fas-L, with no side effects compared to free PTX or temozolomide. This study shows that our unique therapeutic approach offers a viable alternative for the treatment of glioblastoma.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Shiran Ferber

    Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Galia Tiram

    Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Ana Sousa-Herves

    Institute of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Anat Eldar-Boock

    Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Adva Krivitsky

    Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Anna Scomparin

    Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Eilam Yeini

    Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Paula Ofek

    Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Dikla Ben-Shushan

    Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Laura Isabel Vossen

    Institute of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Kai Licha

    Institute of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Rachel Grossman

    Department of Neurosurgery, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Zvi Ram

    Department of Neurosurgery, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Jack Henkin

    Chemistry of Life Processes Institute, Northwestern University, Evanston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Eytan Ruppin

    Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Noam Auslander

    Department of Computer science, University of Maryland, College Park, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Rainer Haag

    Institute of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  18. Marcelo Calderón

    Institute of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  19. Ronit Satchi-Fainaro

    Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
    For correspondence
    ronitsf@post.tau.ac.il
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7360-7837

Funding

H2020 European Research Council (617445)

  • Ronit Satchi-Fainaro

Israel Science Foundation (918/14)

  • Ronit Satchi-Fainaro

Israel Cancer Association (20150909)

  • Ronit Satchi-Fainaro

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (13N11536)

  • Rainer Haag

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (13N12561)

  • Marcelo Calderón

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Charles L Sawyers, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animals were housed in the Tel Aviv University animal facility. The experiments were approved by the animal care and use committee (IACUC) of Tel Aviv University (approval no. 01-12-064, 01-12-065) and conducted in accordance with NIH guidelines.

Human subjects: Experiments involving human tissues were performed with the approval of the Institutional Review Board (IRB) and in compliance with all legal and ethical considerations for human subject research (approval no. 0735-13-TLV). Single human plasma was obtained from a healthy consented unmedicated donor according to German ethical guidelines.

Version history

  1. Received: January 23, 2017
  2. Accepted: October 3, 2017
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: October 4, 2017 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: October 17, 2017 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record updated: November 3, 2017 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2017, Ferber et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,757
    views
  • 551
    downloads
  • 49
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Shiran Ferber
  2. Galia Tiram
  3. Ana Sousa-Herves
  4. Anat Eldar-Boock
  5. Adva Krivitsky
  6. Anna Scomparin
  7. Eilam Yeini
  8. Paula Ofek
  9. Dikla Ben-Shushan
  10. Laura Isabel Vossen
  11. Kai Licha
  12. Rachel Grossman
  13. Zvi Ram
  14. Jack Henkin
  15. Eytan Ruppin
  16. Noam Auslander
  17. Rainer Haag
  18. Marcelo Calderón
  19. Ronit Satchi-Fainaro
(2017)
Co-targeting the tumor endothelium and P-selectin-expressing glioblastoma cells leads to a remarkable therapeutic outcome
eLife 6:e25281.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25281

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25281

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Kevin Nuno, Armon Azizi ... Ravindra Majeti
    Research Article

    Relapse of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is highly aggressive and often treatment refractory. We analyzed previously published AML relapse cohorts and found that 40% of relapses occur without changes in driver mutations, suggesting that non-genetic mechanisms drive relapse in a large proportion of cases. We therefore characterized epigenetic patterns of AML relapse using 26 matched diagnosis-relapse samples with ATAC-seq. This analysis identified a relapse-specific chromatin accessibility signature for mutationally stable AML, suggesting that AML undergoes epigenetic evolution at relapse independent of mutational changes. Analysis of leukemia stem cell (LSC) chromatin changes at relapse indicated that this leukemic compartment underwent significantly less epigenetic evolution than non-LSCs, while epigenetic changes in non-LSCs reflected overall evolution of the bulk leukemia. Finally, we used single-cell ATAC-seq paired with mitochondrial sequencing (mtscATAC) to map clones from diagnosis into relapse along with their epigenetic features. We found that distinct mitochondrially-defined clones exhibit more similar chromatin accessibility at relapse relative to diagnosis, demonstrating convergent epigenetic evolution in relapsed AML. These results demonstrate that epigenetic evolution is a feature of relapsed AML and that convergent epigenetic evolution can occur following treatment with induction chemotherapy.

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Ibtisam Ibtisam, Alexei F Kisselev
    Short Report

    Rapid recovery of proteasome activity may contribute to intrinsic and acquired resistance to FDA-approved proteasome inhibitors. Previous studies have demonstrated that the expression of proteasome genes in cells treated with sub-lethal concentrations of proteasome inhibitors is upregulated by the transcription factor Nrf1 (NFE2L1), which is activated by a DDI2 protease. Here, we demonstrate that the recovery of proteasome activity is DDI2-independent and occurs before transcription of proteasomal genes is upregulated but requires protein translation. Thus, mammalian cells possess an additional DDI2 and transcription-independent pathway for the rapid recovery of proteasome activity after proteasome inhibition.