Protein phosphatase 1 inactivates Mps1 to ensure efficient spindle assembly checkpoint silencing

  1. Margarida Moura
  2. Mariana Osswald
  3. Nelson Leça
  4. João Barbosa
  5. António J Pereira
  6. Helder Maiato
  7. Claudio E Sunkel  Is a corresponding author
  8. Carlos Conde  Is a corresponding author
  1. i3S, Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, Portugal

Abstract

Faithfull genome partitioning during cell division relies on the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint (SAC), a conserved signaling pathway that delays anaphase onset until all chromosomes are attached to spindle microtubules. Mps1 kinase is an upstream SAC regulator that promotes the assembly of an anaphase inhibitor through a sequential multi-target phosphorylation cascade. Thus, the SAC is highly responsive to Mps1, whose activity peaks in early mitosis as a result of its T-loop autophosphorylation. However, the mechanism controlling Mps1 inactivation once kinetochores attach to microtubules and the SAC is satisfied remains unknown. Here we show in vitro and in Drosophila that Protein Phosphatase 1 (PP1) inactivates Mps1 by dephosphorylating its T-loop. PP1-mediated dephosphorylation of Mps1 occurs at kinetochores and in the cytosol, and inactivation of both pools of Mps1 during metaphase is essential to ensure prompt and efficient SAC silencing. Overall, our findings uncover a mechanism of SAC inactivation required for timely mitotic exit.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Margarida Moura

    i3S, Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Mariana Osswald

    i3S, Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Nelson Leça

    i3S, Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. João Barbosa

    i3S, Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. António J Pereira

    i3S, Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Helder Maiato

    i3S, Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Claudio E Sunkel

    i3S, Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
    For correspondence
    cesunkel@ibmc.up.pt
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Carlos Conde

    i3S, Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
    For correspondence
    cconde@ibmc.up.pt
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4177-8519

Funding

FEDER-Fundo Europeu de Desenvolvimento Regional funds through the COMPETE 2020 (Norte-01-0145-FEDER-000029)

  • Margarida Moura
  • Claudio E Sunkel
  • Carlos Conde

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (PTDC7BEX-BCM/1921/2014-PR041602)

  • Claudio E Sunkel

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (PEst-C/SAU/LA0002/2013-Incentivo2014-BGCT)

  • Claudio E Sunkel

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT Investigator grant IF/01755/2014)

  • Carlos Conde

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (GABBA PhD Program grant PD/BD/105746/2014)

  • Mariana Osswald

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT PhD grant SFRH/BD/87871/2012)

  • João Barbosa

European Research Council (PRECISE)

  • Helder Maiato

European Research Council (CODECHECK)

  • Helder Maiato

FLAD Life Science

  • Helder Maiato

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Andrea Musacchio, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Physiology, Germany

Version history

  1. Received: January 23, 2017
  2. Accepted: April 29, 2017
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: May 2, 2017 (version 1)
  4. Accepted Manuscript updated: May 4, 2017 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record published: May 16, 2017 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2017, Moura et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 10,173
    views
  • 719
    downloads
  • 47
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Margarida Moura
  2. Mariana Osswald
  3. Nelson Leça
  4. João Barbosa
  5. António J Pereira
  6. Helder Maiato
  7. Claudio E Sunkel
  8. Carlos Conde
(2017)
Protein phosphatase 1 inactivates Mps1 to ensure efficient spindle assembly checkpoint silencing
eLife 6:e25366.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25366

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25366

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Joanne Tung, Lei Huang ... Adriana Ordonez
    Research Article

    Activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6) is one of three endoplasmic reticulum (ER) transmembrane stress sensors that mediate the unfolded protein response (UPR). Despite its crucial role in long-term ER stress adaptation, regulation of ATF6 alpha (α) signalling remains poorly understood, possibly because its activation involves ER-to-Golgi and nuclear trafficking. Here, we generated an ATF6α/Inositol-requiring kinase 1 (IRE1) dual UPR reporter CHO-K1 cell line and performed an unbiased genome-wide CRISPR/Cas9 mutagenesis screen to systematically profile genetic factors that specifically contribute to ATF6α signalling in the presence and absence of ER stress. The screen identified both anticipated and new candidate genes that regulate ATF6α activation. Among these, calreticulin (CRT), a key ER luminal chaperone, selectively repressed ATF6α signalling: Cells lacking CRT constitutively activated a BiP::sfGFP ATF6α-dependent reporter, had higher BiP levels and an increased rate of trafficking and processing of ATF6α. Purified CRT interacted with the luminal domain of ATF6α in vitro and the two proteins co-immunoprecipitated from cell lysates. CRT depletion exposed a negative feedback loop implicating ATF6α in repressing IRE1 activity basally and overexpression of CRT reversed this repression. Our findings indicate that CRT, beyond its known role as a chaperone, also serves as an ER repressor of ATF6α to selectively regulate one arm of the UPR.

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Alex Weiss, Cassandra D'Amata ... Madeline N Hayes
    Research Article

    High-throughput vertebrate animal model systems for the study of patient-specific biology and new therapeutic approaches for aggressive brain tumors are currently lacking, and new approaches are urgently needed. Therefore, to build a patient-relevant in vivo model of human glioblastoma, we expressed common oncogenic variants including activated human EGFRvIII and PI3KCAH1047R under the control of the radial glial-specific promoter her4.1 in syngeneic tp53 loss-of-function mutant zebrafish. Robust tumor formation was observed prior to 45 days of life, and tumors had a gene expression signature similar to human glioblastoma of the mesenchymal subtype, with a strong inflammatory component. Within early stage tumor lesions, and in an in vivo and endogenous tumor microenvironment, we visualized infiltration of phagocytic cells, as well as internalization of tumor cells by mpeg1.1:EGFP+ microglia/macrophages, suggesting negative regulatory pressure by pro-inflammatory cell types on tumor growth at early stages of glioblastoma initiation. Furthermore, CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene targeting of master inflammatory transcription factors irf7 or irf8 led to increased tumor formation in the primary context, while suppression of phagocyte activity led to enhanced tumor cell engraftment following transplantation into otherwise immune-competent zebrafish hosts. Altogether, we developed a genetically relevant model of aggressive human glioblastoma and harnessed the unique advantages of zebrafish including live imaging, high-throughput genetic and chemical manipulations to highlight important tumor-suppressive roles for the innate immune system on glioblastoma initiation, with important future opportunities for therapeutic discovery and optimizations.