Arid1b haploinsufficient mice reveal neuropsychiatric phenotypes and reversible causes of growth impairment

  1. Cemre Celen
  2. Jen-Chieh Chuang
  3. Xin Luo
  4. Nadine Nijem
  5. Angela K Walker
  6. Fei Chen
  7. Shuyuan Zhang
  8. Andrew Seungjae Chung
  9. Liem H Nguyen
  10. Ibrahim Nassour
  11. Albert Budhipramono
  12. Xuxu Sun
  13. Levinus A Bok
  14. Meriel McEntagart
  15. Evelien Gevers
  16. Shari G Birnbaum
  17. Amelia J Eisch
  18. Craig M Powell
  19. Woo-Ping Ge
  20. Gijs WE Santen
  21. Maria Chahrour
  22. Hao Zhu  Is a corresponding author
  1. UT Southwestern Medical Center, United States
  2. University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, United States
  3. Máxima Medical Center, Netherlands
  4. St George's University Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
  5. Queen Mary University of London, United Kingdom
  6. University of Pennsylvania, United States
  7. Leiden University Medical Center, Netherlands

Abstract

Sequencing studies have implicated haploinsufficiency of ARID1B, a SWI/SNF chromatin-remodeling subunit, in short stature (1), autism spectrum disorder (2), intellectual disability (3), and corpus callosum agenesis (4). In addition, ARID1B is the most common cause of Coffin-Siris Syndrome, a developmental delay syndrome characterized by some of the above abnormalities (5-7). We generated Arid1b heterozygous mice, which showed social behavior impairment, altered vocalization, anxiety-like behavior, neuroanatomical abnormalities, and growth impairment. In the brain, Arid1b haploinsufficiency resulted in changes in the expression of SWI/SNF-regulated genes implicated in neuropsychiatric disorders. A focus on reversible mechanisms identified insulin-like growth factor (IGF1) deficiency with inadequate compensation by Growth Hormone Releasing Hormone (GHRH) and Growth Hormone (GH), underappreciated findings in ARID1B patients. Therapeutically, GH supplementation was able to correct growth retardation and muscle weakness. This model functionally validates the involvement of ARID1B in human disorders, and allows mechanistic dissection of neurodevelopmental diseases linked to chromatin-remodeling.

Data availability

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Cemre Celen

    The Children's Medical Center Research Institute, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Jen-Chieh Chuang

    Children's Research Institute, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Xin Luo

    Children's Research Institute, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Nadine Nijem

    Department of Neuroscience, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Angela K Walker

    Department of Neurology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Fei Chen

    Children's Research Institute, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Shuyuan Zhang

    Children's Research Institute, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Andrew Seungjae Chung

    Children's Research Institute, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Liem H Nguyen

    Children's Research Institute, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Ibrahim Nassour

    Children's Research Institute, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Albert Budhipramono

    Children's Research Institute, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Xuxu Sun

    Children's Research Institute, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Levinus A Bok

    Department of Pediatrics, Máxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Meriel McEntagart

    Medical Genetics, St George's University Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Evelien Gevers

    William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and the London, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Shari G Birnbaum

    Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Amelia J Eisch

    Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  18. Craig M Powell

    Department of Neurology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  19. Woo-Ping Ge

    Children's Research Institute, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  20. Gijs WE Santen

    Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  21. Maria Chahrour

    Department of Neuroscience, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  22. Hao Zhu

    Children's Research Institute, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    For correspondence
    Hao.Zhu@utsouthwestern.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8417-9698

Funding

Hamon Center for Regenerative Science and Medicine

  • Cemre Celen
  • Xuxu Sun

National Institutes of Health (DA023555)

  • Amelia J Eisch

National Institutes of Health (MH107945)

  • Amelia J Eisch

Postdoctoral Institutional training grant (NIDA T32-DA007290)

  • Angela K Walker

HHMI International Fellowship

  • Liem H Nguyen

Pollack Foundation

  • Hao Zhu

National Institutes of Health (1K08CA157727)

  • Hao Zhu

National Cancer Institute (1R01CA190525)

  • Hao Zhu

Burroughs Wellcome Fund

  • Hao Zhu

CPRIT New Investigator Award (R1209)

  • Hao Zhu

CPRIT Early Translation Grant (DP150077)

  • Hao Zhu

National Institutes of Health (DA023701)

  • Amelia J Eisch

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Revised ethics statement: All animal procedures were based on animal care guidelines approved by the Institutional. Animal Care and Use Committee at University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (UTSW). Animal protocol number is 2015-101118. Patient data included in the article is non-identifiable data, and hence does not require approval from the patient/parents.

Human subjects: All animal procedures were based on animal care guidelines approved by the Institutional. Animal Care and Use Committee at University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (UTSW). Animal protocol number is 2015-101118. Patient data included in the article is non-identifiable data, and hence does not require approval from the patients.

Copyright

© 2017, Celen et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,103
    views
  • 796
    downloads
  • 87
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Cemre Celen
  2. Jen-Chieh Chuang
  3. Xin Luo
  4. Nadine Nijem
  5. Angela K Walker
  6. Fei Chen
  7. Shuyuan Zhang
  8. Andrew Seungjae Chung
  9. Liem H Nguyen
  10. Ibrahim Nassour
  11. Albert Budhipramono
  12. Xuxu Sun
  13. Levinus A Bok
  14. Meriel McEntagart
  15. Evelien Gevers
  16. Shari G Birnbaum
  17. Amelia J Eisch
  18. Craig M Powell
  19. Woo-Ping Ge
  20. Gijs WE Santen
  21. Maria Chahrour
  22. Hao Zhu
(2017)
Arid1b haploinsufficient mice reveal neuropsychiatric phenotypes and reversible causes of growth impairment
eLife 6:e25730.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25730

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25730

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Bhanu Shrestha, Jiun Sang ... Youngseok Lee
    Research Article

    Sour taste, which is elicited by low pH, may serve to help animals distinguish appetitive from potentially harmful food sources. In all species studied to date, the attractiveness of oral acids is contingent on concentration. Many carboxylic acids are attractive at ecologically relevant concentrations but become aversive beyond some maximal concentration. Recent work found that Drosophila ionotropic receptors IR25a and IR76b expressed by sweet-responsive gustatory receptor neurons (GRNs) in the labellum, a peripheral gustatory organ, mediate appetitive feeding behaviors toward dilute carboxylic acids. Here, we disclose the existence of pharyngeal sensors in Drosophila melanogaster that detect ingested carboxylic acids and are also involved in the appetitive responses to carboxylic acids. These pharyngeal sensors rely on IR51b, IR94a, and IR94h, together with IR25a and IR76b, to drive responses to carboxylic acids. We then demonstrate that optogenetic activation of either Ir94a+ or Ir94h+ GRNs promotes an appetitive feeding response, confirming their contributions to appetitive feeding behavior. Our discovery of internal pharyngeal sour taste receptors opens up new avenues for investigating the internal sensation of tastants in insects.

    1. Neuroscience
    Yiting Li, Wenqu Yin ... Baoming Li
    Research Article

    Time estimation is an essential prerequisite underlying various cognitive functions. Previous studies identified ‘sequential firing’ and ‘activity ramps’ as the primary neuron activity patterns in the medial frontal cortex (mPFC) that could convey information regarding time. However, the relationship between these patterns and the timing behavior has not been fully understood. In this study, we utilized in vivo calcium imaging of mPFC in rats performing a timing task. We observed cells that showed selective activation at trial start, end, or during the timing interval. By aligning long-term time-lapse datasets, we discovered that sequential patterns of time coding were stable over weeks, while cells coding for trial start or end showed constant dynamism. Furthermore, with a novel behavior design that allowed the animal to determine individual trial interval, we were able to demonstrate that real-time adjustment in the sequence procession speed closely tracked the trial-to-trial interval variations. And errors in the rats’ timing behavior can be primarily attributed to the premature ending of the time sequence. Together, our data suggest that sequential activity maybe a stable neural substrate that represents time under physiological conditions. Furthermore, our results imply the existence of a unique cell type in the mPFC that participates in the time-related sequences. Future characterization of this cell type could provide important insights in the neural mechanism of timing and related cognitive functions.