Intracellular uptake of macromolecules by brain lymphatic endothelial cells during zebrafish embryonic development

  1. Max van Lessen
  2. Shannon Shibata-Germanos
  3. Andreas van Impel
  4. Thomas A Hawkins
  5. Jason Rihel
  6. Stefan Schulte-Merker  Is a corresponding author
  1. Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Germany
  2. University College London, United Kingdom

Abstract

The lymphatic system controls fluid homeostasis and the clearance of macromolecules from interstitial compartments. In mammals brain lymphatics were only recently discovered, with significant implications for physiology and disease. We examined zebrafish for the presence of brain lymphatics and found loosely connected endothelial cells with lymphatic molecular signature covering parts of the brain without forming endothelial tubular structures. These brain lymphatic endothelial cells (BLECs) derive from venous endothelium, are distinct from macrophages, and are sensitive to loss of Vegfc. BLECs endocytose macromolecules in a selective manner, which can be blocked by injection of mannose receptor ligands. This first report on brain lymphatic endothelial cells in a vertebrate embryo identifies cells with unique features, including the uptake of macromolecules at a single cell level. Future studies will address whether this represents an uptake mechanism that is conserved in mammals and how these cells affect functions of the embryonic and adult brain.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Max van Lessen

    Institute of Cardiovascular Organogenesis and Regeneration, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Münster, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Shannon Shibata-Germanos

    Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Andreas van Impel

    Institute of Cardiovascular Organogenesis and Regeneration, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Münster, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Thomas A Hawkins

    Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Jason Rihel

    Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Stefan Schulte-Merker

    Institute for Cardiovascular Organogenesis and Regeneration, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Muenster, Germany
    For correspondence
    schultes@ukmuenster.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3617-8807

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (FOR2325)

  • Stefan Schulte-Merker

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (CiM 1003)

  • Max van Lessen

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Holger Gerhardt, Max Delbrück Centre for Molecular Medicine, Germany

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Experimental procedures were conducted under project licence awarded to J.R. from the UK Home Office (Permit Number: 70/7612), according to the UK Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986.

Version history

  1. Received: February 10, 2017
  2. Accepted: May 11, 2017
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: May 12, 2017 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: June 2, 2017 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2017, van Lessen et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,332
    Page views
  • 859
    Downloads
  • 61
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, Scopus, PubMed Central.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Max van Lessen
  2. Shannon Shibata-Germanos
  3. Andreas van Impel
  4. Thomas A Hawkins
  5. Jason Rihel
  6. Stefan Schulte-Merker
(2017)
Intracellular uptake of macromolecules by brain lymphatic endothelial cells during zebrafish embryonic development
eLife 6:e25932.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25932

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25932

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Tariq Zaman, Daniel Vogt ... Michael R Williams
    Research Article

    The cell-type-specific expression of ligand/receptor and cell-adhesion molecules is a fundamental mechanism through which neurons regulate connectivity. Here, we determine a functional relevance of the long-established mutually exclusive expression of the receptor tyrosine kinase Kit and the trans-membrane protein Kit Ligand by discrete populations of neurons in the mammalian brain. Kit is enriched in molecular layer interneurons (MLIs) of the cerebellar cortex (i.e., stellate and basket cells), while cerebellar Kit Ligand is selectively expressed by a target of their inhibition, Purkinje cells (PCs). By in vivo genetic manipulation spanning embryonic development through adulthood, we demonstrate that PC Kit Ligand and MLI Kit are required for, and capable of driving changes in, the inhibition of PCs. Collectively, these works in mice demonstrate that the Kit Ligand/Kit receptor dyad sustains mammalian central synapse function and suggest a rationale for the affiliation of Kit mutation with neurodevelopmental disorders.

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Smrithi Prem, Bharati Dev ... Emanuel DiCicco-Bloom
    Research Article

    Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is defined by common behavioral characteristics, raising the possibility of shared pathogenic mechanisms. Yet, vast clinical and etiological heterogeneity suggests personalized phenotypes. Surprisingly, our iPSC studies find that six individuals from two distinct ASD-subtypes, idiopathic and 16p11.2 deletion, have common reductions in neural precursor cell (NPC) neurite outgrowth and migration even though whole genome sequencing demonstrates no genetic overlap between the datasets. To identify signaling differences that may contribute to these developmental defects, an unbiased phospho-(p)-proteome screen was performed. Surprisingly despite the genetic heterogeneity, hundreds of shared p-peptides were identified between autism subtypes including the mTOR pathway. mTOR signaling alterations were confirmed in all NPCs across both ASD-subtypes, and mTOR modulation rescued ASD phenotypes and reproduced autism NPC associated phenotypes in control NPCs. Thus, our studies demonstrate that genetically distinct ASD subtypes have common defects in neurite outgrowth and migration which are driven by the shared pathogenic mechanism of mTOR signaling dysregulation.