microCT-based phenomics in the zebrafish skeleton reveals virtues of deep phenotyping in a distributed organ system

  1. Matthew Hur
  2. Charlotte A Gistelinck
  3. Philippe Huber
  4. Jane Lee
  5. Marjorie H Thompson
  6. Adrian T Monstad-Rios
  7. Claire J Watson
  8. Sarah K McMenamin
  9. Andy Willaert
  10. David M Parichy
  11. Paul Coucke
  12. Ronald Y Kwon  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Washington, United States
  2. Ghent University, Belgium
  3. Boston College, United States
  4. University of Virginia, United States

Abstract

Phenomics, which ideally involves in-depth phenotyping at the whole-organism scale, may enhance our functional understanding of genetic variation. Here, we demonstrate methods to profile hundreds of phenotypic measures comprised of morphological and densitometric traits at a large number of sites within the axial skeleton of adult zebrafish. We show the potential for vertebral patterns to confer heightened sensitivity, with similar specificity, in discriminating mutant populations compared to analyzing individual vertebrae in isolation. We identify phenotypes associated with human brittle bone disease and thyroid stimulating hormone receptor hyperactivity. Finally, we develop allometric models and show their potential to aid in the discrimination of mutant phenotypes masked by alterations in growth. Our studies demonstrate virtues of deep phenotyping in a spatially distributed organ system. Analyzing phenotypic patterns may increase productivity in genetic screens, and facilitate the study of genetic variants associated with smaller effect sizes, such as those that underlie complex diseases.

Data availability

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Matthew Hur

    Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Charlotte A Gistelinck

    Center for Medical Genetics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Philippe Huber

    Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Jane Lee

    Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Marjorie H Thompson

    Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Adrian T Monstad-Rios

    Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Claire J Watson

    Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Sarah K McMenamin

    Department of Biology, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Andy Willaert

    Center for Medical Genetics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. David M Parichy

    Department of Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Paul Coucke

    Center for Medical Genetics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Ronald Y Kwon

    Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    For correspondence
    ronkwon@uw.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9760-3761

Funding

University of Washington (A88052)

  • Ronald Y Kwon

National Institutes of Health (AR066061)

  • Ronald Y Kwon

Belgian Science Policy Office Interuniversity Attraction Poles Program (IAP P7/43-BeMGI)

  • Paul Coucke

National Institutes of Health (GM105874)

  • Sarah K McMenamin

National Institutes of Health (HD091634)

  • Sarah K McMenamin

National Institutes of Health (GM11233)

  • David M Parichy

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Richard M White, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All studies were performed on an approved protocol (#4306-01) in accordance with the University of Washington Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC).

Version history

  1. Received: February 15, 2017
  2. Accepted: August 21, 2017
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: September 8, 2017 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: September 20, 2017 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2017, Hur et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,860
    views
  • 382
    downloads
  • 57
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Matthew Hur
  2. Charlotte A Gistelinck
  3. Philippe Huber
  4. Jane Lee
  5. Marjorie H Thompson
  6. Adrian T Monstad-Rios
  7. Claire J Watson
  8. Sarah K McMenamin
  9. Andy Willaert
  10. David M Parichy
  11. Paul Coucke
  12. Ronald Y Kwon
(2017)
microCT-based phenomics in the zebrafish skeleton reveals virtues of deep phenotyping in a distributed organ system
eLife 6:e26014.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.26014

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.26014

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    David Geller-McGrath, Kishori M Konwar ... Jason E McDermott
    Tools and Resources

    The reconstruction of complete microbial metabolic pathways using ‘omics data from environmental samples remains challenging. Computational pipelines for pathway reconstruction that utilize machine learning methods to predict the presence or absence of KEGG modules in incomplete genomes are lacking. Here, we present MetaPathPredict, a software tool that incorporates machine learning models to predict the presence of complete KEGG modules within bacterial genomic datasets. Using gene annotation data and information from the KEGG module database, MetaPathPredict employs deep learning models to predict the presence of KEGG modules in a genome. MetaPathPredict can be used as a command line tool or as a Python module, and both options are designed to be run locally or on a compute cluster. Benchmarks show that MetaPathPredict makes robust predictions of KEGG module presence within highly incomplete genomes.

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Evolutionary Biology
    Kenya Hitomi, Yoichiro Ishii, Bei-Wen Ying
    Research Article

    As the genome encodes the information crucial for cell growth, a sizeable genomic deficiency often causes a significant decrease in growth fitness. Whether and how the decreased growth fitness caused by genome reduction could be compensated by evolution was investigated here. Experimental evolution with an Escherichia coli strain carrying a reduced genome was conducted in multiple lineages for approximately 1000 generations. The growth rate, which largely declined due to genome reduction, was considerably recovered, associated with the improved carrying capacity. Genome mutations accumulated during evolution were significantly varied across the evolutionary lineages and were randomly localized on the reduced genome. Transcriptome reorganization showed a common evolutionary direction and conserved the chromosomal periodicity, regardless of highly diversified gene categories, regulons, and pathways enriched in the differentially expressed genes. Genome mutations and transcriptome reorganization caused by evolution, which were found to be dissimilar to those caused by genome reduction, must have followed divergent mechanisms in individual evolutionary lineages. Gene network reconstruction successfully identified three gene modules functionally differentiated, which were responsible for the evolutionary changes of the reduced genome in growth fitness, genome mutation, and gene expression, respectively. The diversity in evolutionary approaches improved the growth fitness associated with the homeostatic transcriptome architecture as if the evolutionary compensation for genome reduction was like all roads leading to Rome.