Post-meiotic DNA double-strand breaks occur in Tetrahymena, and require Topoisomerase II and Spo11

  1. Takahiko Akematsu  Is a corresponding author
  2. Yasuhiro Fukuda
  3. Jyoti Garg
  4. Jeffrey S Fillingham
  5. Ronald E Pearlman
  6. Josef Loidl
  1. University of Vienna, Austria
  2. Tohoku University, Japan
  3. York University, Canada
  4. Ryerson University, Canada

Abstract

Based on observations of markers for DNA lesions, such as phosphorylated histone H2AX (γH2AX) and open DNA ends, it has been suggested that post-meiotic DNA double-strand breaks (PM-DSBs) enable chromatin remodeling during animal spermiogenesis. However, the existence of PM-DSBs is unconfirmed, and the mechanism responsible for their formation is unclear. Here, we report the first direct observation of programmed PM-DSBs via the electrophoretic separation of DSB-generated DNA fragments in the ciliate Tetrahymena thermophila. These PM-DSBs are accompanied by switching from a heterochromatic to euchromatic chromatin structure in the haploid pronucleus. Both a topoisomerase II paralog with exclusive pronuclear expression and Spo11 are prerequisites for PM-DSB induction. Reduced PM-DSB induction blocks euchromatin formation, characterized by histone H3K56 acetylation, leading to a failure in gametic nuclei production. We propose that PM-DSBs are responsible for histone replacement during the reprogramming of generative to undifferentiated progeny nuclei.

Data availability

The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Takahiko Akematsu

    Department of Chromosome Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
    For correspondence
    takahiko.akematsu@univie.ac.at
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9396-0243
  2. Yasuhiro Fukuda

    Department of Biodiversity Science, Tohoku University, Oosaki, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Jyoti Garg

    Department of Biology, York University, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Jeffrey S Fillingham

    Department of Chemistry and Biology, Ryerson University, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Ronald E Pearlman

    Department of Biology, York University, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Josef Loidl

    Department of Chromosome Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

Seventh Framework Programme (609431)

  • Takahiko Akematsu

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (15K18475)

  • Yasuhiro Fukuda

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP13347)

  • Ronald E Pearlman

Austrian Science Fund (P27313-B20)

  • Josef Loidl

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (539509)

  • Ronald E Pearlman

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2017, Akematsu et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,085
    views
  • 270
    downloads
  • 35
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Takahiko Akematsu
  2. Yasuhiro Fukuda
  3. Jyoti Garg
  4. Jeffrey S Fillingham
  5. Ronald E Pearlman
  6. Josef Loidl
(2017)
Post-meiotic DNA double-strand breaks occur in Tetrahymena, and require Topoisomerase II and Spo11
eLife 6:e26176.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.26176

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.26176

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Tamás Visnovitz, Dorina Lenzinger ... Edit I Buzas
    Short Report

    Recent studies showed an unexpected complexity of extracellular vesicle (EV) biogenesis pathways. We previously found evidence that human colorectal cancer cells in vivo release large multivesicular body-like structures en bloc. Here, we tested whether this large EV type is unique to colorectal cancer cells. We found that all cell types we studied (including different cell lines and cells in their original tissue environment) released multivesicular large EVs (MV-lEVs). We also demonstrated that upon spontaneous rupture of the limiting membrane of the MV-lEVs, their intraluminal vesicles (ILVs) escaped to the extracellular environment by a ‘torn bag mechanism’. We proved that the MV-lEVs were released by ectocytosis of amphisomes (hence, we termed them amphiectosomes). Both ILVs of amphiectosomes and small EVs separated from conditioned media were either exclusively CD63 or LC3B positive. According to our model, upon fusion of multivesicular bodies with autophagosomes, fragments of the autophagosomal inner membrane curl up to form LC3B positive ILVs of amphisomes, while CD63 positive small EVs are of multivesicular body origin. Our data suggest a novel common release mechanism for small EVs, distinct from the exocytosis of multivesicular bodies or amphisomes, as well as the small ectosome release pathway.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Adam D Longhurst, Kyle Wang ... David P Toczyski
    Tools and Resources

    Progression through the G1 phase of the cell cycle is the most highly regulated step in cellular division. We employed a chemogenetic approach to discover novel cellular networks that regulate cell cycle progression. This approach uncovered functional clusters of genes that altered sensitivity of cells to inhibitors of the G1/S transition. Mutation of components of the Polycomb Repressor Complex 2 rescued proliferation inhibition caused by the CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib, but not to inhibitors of S phase or mitosis. In addition to its core catalytic subunits, mutation of the PRC2.1 accessory protein MTF2, but not the PRC2.2 protein JARID2, rendered cells resistant to palbociclib treatment. We found that PRC2.1 (MTF2), but not PRC2.2 (JARID2), was critical for promoting H3K27me3 deposition at CpG islands genome-wide and in promoters. This included the CpG islands in the promoter of the CDK4/6 cyclins CCND1 and CCND2, and loss of MTF2 lead to upregulation of both CCND1 and CCND2. Our results demonstrate a role for PRC2.1, but not PRC2.2, in antagonizing G1 progression in a diversity of cell linages, including chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), breast cancer, and immortalized cell lines.