1. Neuroscience
Download icon

Attenuation of dopamine-modulated prefrontal value signals underlies probabilistic reward learning deficits in old age

  1. Lieke de Boer  Is a corresponding author
  2. Jan Axelsson
  3. Katrine Riklund
  4. Lars Nyberg
  5. Peter Dayan
  6. Lars Bäckman
  7. Marc Guitart-Masip  Is a corresponding author
  1. Karolinska Institute, Sweden
  2. Umeå University, Sweden
  3. University College London, United Kingdom
Research Article
  • Cited 19
  • Views 1,462
  • Annotations
Cite this article as: eLife 2017;6:e26424 doi: 10.7554/eLife.26424

Abstract

Probabilistic reward learning is characterised by individual differences that become acute in aging. This may be due to age-related dopamine (DA) decline affecting neural processing in striatum, prefrontal cortex, or both. We examined this by administering a probabilistic reward learning task to younger and older adults, and combining computational modelling of behaviour, fMRI and PET measurements of DA D1 availability. We found that anticipatory value signals in ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) were attenuated in older adults. The strength of this signal predicted performance beyond age and was modulated by D1 availability in nucleus accumbens. These results uncover that a value-anticipation mechanism in vmPFC declines in aging, and that this mechanisms is associated with DA D1 receptor availability.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Lieke de Boer

    Aging Research Center, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
    For correspondence
    liekelotte@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3381-2040
  2. Jan Axelsson

    Department of Radiation Sciences, Diagnostic Radiology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Katrine Riklund

    Department of Radiation Sciences, Diagnostic Radiology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Lars Nyberg

    Department of Radiation Sciences, Diagnostic Radiology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Peter Dayan

    Gatsby Computational Neuroscience Unit, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3476-1839
  6. Lars Bäckman

    Aging Research Center, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Marc Guitart-Masip

    Aging Research Center, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
    For correspondence
    marc.guitart-masip@ki.se
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2294-6492

Funding

Vetenskapsrådet (VR521-2013-2589)

  • Marc Guitart-Masip

Gatsby Charitable Foundation

  • Peter Dayan

Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung (Humboldt Research Award)

  • Lars Bäckman

Stichting af Jochnick Foundation

  • Lars Bäckman

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: Ethical approval was obtained from the Umeå Ethical Review Board, identifier DNR 2014-251-31M. All participants provided written informed consent prior to commencing the study.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Wolfram Schultz, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom

Publication history

  1. Received: February 28, 2017
  2. Accepted: August 11, 2017
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: September 5, 2017 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: September 11, 2017 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2017, de Boer et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,462
    Page views
  • 242
    Downloads
  • 19
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Scopus, Crossref, PubMed Central.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Qiang Chen et al.
    Research Advance

    Previously, we found that in the mammalian retina, inhibitory inputs onto starburst amacrine cells (SACs) are required for robust direction selectivity of On-Off direction-selective ganglion cells (On-Off DSGCs) against noisy backgrounds (Chen et al., 2016). However, the source of the inhibitory inputs to SACs and how this inhibition confers noise resilience of DSGCs are unknown. Here, we show that when visual noise is present in the background, the motion-evoked inhibition to an On-Off DSGC is preserved by a disinhibitory motif consisting of a serially connected network of neighboring SACs presynaptic to the DSGC. This preservation of inhibition by a disinhibitory motif arises from the interaction between visually evoked network dynamics and short-term synaptic plasticity at the SAC-DSGC synapse. While the disinhibitory microcircuit is well studied for its disinhibitory function in brain circuits, our results highlight the algorithmic flexibility of this motif beyond disinhibition due to the mutual influence between network and synaptic plasticity mechanisms.

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Dennis Segebarth et al.
    Research Article Updated

    Bioimage analysis of fluorescent labels is widely used in the life sciences. Recent advances in deep learning (DL) allow automating time-consuming manual image analysis processes based on annotated training data. However, manual annotation of fluorescent features with a low signal-to-noise ratio is somewhat subjective. Training DL models on subjective annotations may be instable or yield biased models. In turn, these models may be unable to reliably detect biological effects. An analysis pipeline integrating data annotation, ground truth estimation, and model training can mitigate this risk. To evaluate this integrated process, we compared different DL-based analysis approaches. With data from two model organisms (mice, zebrafish) and five laboratories, we show that ground truth estimation from multiple human annotators helps to establish objectivity in fluorescent feature annotations. Furthermore, ensembles of multiple models trained on the estimated ground truth establish reliability and validity. Our research provides guidelines for reproducible DL-based bioimage analyses.