Pirating conserved phage mechanisms promotes promiscuous staphylococcal pathogenicity island transfer

  1. Janine Bowring
  2. Maan M Neamah
  3. Jorge Donderis
  4. Ignacio Mir-Sanchis
  5. Christian Alite
  6. J Rafael Ciges-Tomas
  7. Elisa Maiques
  8. Iltyar Medmedov
  9. Alberto Marina
  10. Jose R Penades  Is a corresponding author
  1. Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, United Kingdom
  2. Instituto de Biomedicina de Valencia (IBV-CSIC), Spain
  3. The University of Chicago, United States

Abstract

Targeting conserved and essential processes is a successful strategy to combat enemies. Remarkably, the clinically important Staphylococcus aureus pathogenicity islands (SaPIs) use this tactic to spread in nature. SaPIs reside passively in the host chromosome, under the control of the SaPI-encoded master repressor, Stl. It has been assumed that SaPI de-repression is effected by specific phage proteins that bind to Stl, initiating the SaPI cycle. Different SaPIs encode different Stl repressors, so each targets a specific phage protein for its de-repression. Broadening this narrow vision, we report here that SaPIs ensure their promiscuous transfer by targeting conserved phage mechanisms. This is accomplished because the SaPI Stl repressors have acquired different domains to interact with unrelated proteins, encoded by different phages, but in all cases performing the same conserved function. This elegant strategy allows intra- and inter-generic SaPI transfer, highlighting these elements as one of nature’s most fascinating subcellular parasites.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Janine Bowring

    Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Maan M Neamah

    Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7068-8416
  3. Jorge Donderis

    Instituto de Biomedicina de Valencia (IBV-CSIC), Valencia, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Ignacio Mir-Sanchis

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6536-0045
  5. Christian Alite

    Instituto de Biomedicina de Valencia (IBV-CSIC), Valencia, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. J Rafael Ciges-Tomas

    Instituto de Biomedicina de Valencia (IBV-CSIC), Valencia, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Elisa Maiques

    Instituto de Biomedicina de Valencia (IBV-CSIC), Valencia, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Iltyar Medmedov

    Instituto de Biomedicina de Valencia (IBV-CSIC), Valencia, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Alberto Marina

    Instituto de Biomedicina de Valencia (IBV-CSIC), Valencia, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1334-5273
  10. Jose R Penades

    Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    joser.penades@glasgow.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6439-5262

Funding

Wellcome (201531/Z/16/Z)

  • Jose R Penades

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/N002873/1)

  • Jose R Penades

Medical Research Council (MR/M003876/1)

  • Jose R Penades

Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (BIO2013-42619-P)

  • Alberto Marina

Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (BIO2016-78571-P)

  • Alberto Marina

ERC Advanced Grant 2014 (Proposal n{degree sign} 670932 Dut-signal)

  • Jose R Penades

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2017, Bowring et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,196
    views
  • 409
    downloads
  • 25
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Janine Bowring
  2. Maan M Neamah
  3. Jorge Donderis
  4. Ignacio Mir-Sanchis
  5. Christian Alite
  6. J Rafael Ciges-Tomas
  7. Elisa Maiques
  8. Iltyar Medmedov
  9. Alberto Marina
  10. Jose R Penades
(2017)
Pirating conserved phage mechanisms promotes promiscuous staphylococcal pathogenicity island transfer
eLife 6:e26487.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.26487

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.26487

Further reading

    1. Immunology and Inflammation
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Hiroyuki Yamamoto, Tetsuro Matano
    Research Article

    HIV and simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) infections are known for impaired neutralizing antibody (NAb) responses. While sequential virus–host B cell interaction appears to be basally required for NAb induction, driver molecular signatures predisposing to NAb induction still remain largely unknown. Here we describe SIV-specific NAb induction following a virus–host interplay decreasing aberrant viral drive of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K). Screening of seventy difficult-to-neutralize SIVmac239-infected macaques found nine NAb-inducing animals, with seven selecting for a specific CD8+ T-cell escape mutation in viral nef before NAb induction. This Nef-G63E mutation reduced excess Nef interaction-mediated drive of B-cell maturation-limiting PI3K/mammalian target of rapamycin complex 2 (mTORC2). In vivo imaging cytometry depicted preferential Nef perturbation of cognate Envelope-specific B cells, suggestive of polarized contact-dependent Nef transfer and corroborating cognate B-cell maturation post-mutant selection up to NAb induction. Results collectively exemplify a NAb induction pattern extrinsically reciprocal to human PI3K gain-of-function antibody-dysregulating disease and indicate that harnessing the PI3K/mTORC2 axis may facilitate NAb induction against difficult-to-neutralize viruses including HIV/SIV.

    1. Evolutionary Biology
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Zach Hensel
    Short Report

    Accurate estimation of the effects of mutations on SARS-CoV-2 viral fitness can inform public-health responses such as vaccine development and predicting the impact of a new variant; it can also illuminate biological mechanisms including those underlying the emergence of variants of concern. Recently, Lan et al. reported a model of SARS-CoV-2 secondary structure and its underlying dimethyl sulfate reactivity data (Lan et al., 2022). I investigated whether base reactivities and secondary structure models derived from them can explain some variability in the frequency of observing different nucleotide substitutions across millions of patient sequences in the SARS-CoV-2 phylogenetic tree. Nucleotide basepairing was compared to the estimated ‘mutational fitness’ of substitutions, a measurement of the difference between a substitution’s observed and expected frequency that is correlated with other estimates of viral fitness (Bloom and Neher, 2023). This comparison revealed that secondary structure is often predictive of substitution frequency, with significant decreases in substitution frequencies at basepaired positions. Focusing on the mutational fitness of C→U, the most common type of substitution, I describe C→U substitutions at basepaired positions that characterize major SARS-CoV-2 variants; such mutations may have a greater impact on fitness than appreciated when considering substitution frequency alone.