A quantitative theory of gamma synchronization in macaque V1

  1. Eric Lowet  Is a corresponding author
  2. Mark Jonathan Roberts
  3. Alina Peter
  4. Bart Gips
  5. Peter de Weerd
  1. Boston University, United States
  2. Maastricht University, Netherlands
  3. Ernst Strüngmann Institute for Neuroscience in Cooperation with Max PLanck Society, Germany
  4. Radboud University, Netherlands

Abstract

Gamma-band synchronization coordinates brief periods of excitability in oscillating neuronal populations to optimize information transmission during sensation and cognition. Commonly, a stable, shared frequency over time is considered a condition for functional neural synchronization. Here, we demonstrate the opposite: instantaneous frequency modulations are critical to regulate phase relations and synchronization. In monkey visual area V1, nearby local populations driven by different visual stimulation showed different gamma frequencies. When similar enough, these frequencies continually attracted and repulsed each other, which enabled preferred phase relations to be maintained in periods of minimized frequency difference. Crucially, the precise dynamics of frequencies and phases across a wide range of stimulus conditions was predicted from a physics theory that describes how weakly coupled oscillators influence each other’s phase relations. Hence, the fundamental mathematical principle of synchronization through instantaneous frequency modulations applies to gamma in V1, and is likely generalizable to other brain regions and rhythms.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Eric Lowet

    Boston University, Boston, United States
    For correspondence
    elowet@mailfence.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9793-0639
  2. Mark Jonathan Roberts

    Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Alina Peter

    Ernst Strüngmann Institute for Neuroscience in Cooperation with Max PLanck Society, Frankfurt, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Bart Gips

    Donders Institute for Brain,Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Peter de Weerd

    Boston University, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (451-09-025)

  • Mark Jonathan Roberts

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (453-04-002)

  • Peter de Weerd

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All the procedures were in accordance with the European council directive 684 2010/63/EU, the Dutch 'experiments on animal acts' (1997) and approved by the Radboud 685 University ethical committee on experiments with animals (Dier‐Experimenten‐Commissie, 686 DEC).

Reviewing Editor

  1. Charles E Schroeder, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, United States

Publication history

  1. Received: March 8, 2017
  2. Accepted: August 21, 2017
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: August 31, 2017 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: September 25, 2017 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record updated: November 8, 2017 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2017, Lowet et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,445
    Page views
  • 449
    Downloads
  • 35
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Eric Lowet
  2. Mark Jonathan Roberts
  3. Alina Peter
  4. Bart Gips
  5. Peter de Weerd
(2017)
A quantitative theory of gamma synchronization in macaque V1
eLife 6:e26642.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.26642

Further reading

    1. Medicine
    2. Neuroscience
    Sachin Sharma, Russell Littman ... Olujimi A Ajijola
    Research Article Updated

    The cell bodies of postganglionic sympathetic neurons innervating the heart primarily reside in the stellate ganglion (SG), alongside neurons innervating other organs and tissues. Whether cardiac-innervating stellate ganglionic neurons (SGNs) exhibit diversity and distinction from those innervating other tissues is not known. To identify and resolve the transcriptomic profiles of SGNs innervating the heart, we leveraged retrograde tracing techniques using adeno-associated virus (AAV) expressing fluorescent proteins (GFP or Td-tomato) with single cell RNA sequencing. We investigated electrophysiologic, morphologic, and physiologic roles for subsets of cardiac-specific neurons and found that three of five adrenergic SGN subtypes innervate the heart. These three subtypes stratify into two subpopulations; high (NA1a) and low (NA1b and NA1c) neuropeptide-Y (NPY) -expressing cells, exhibit distinct morphological, neurochemical, and electrophysiologic characteristics. In physiologic studies in transgenic mouse models modulating NPY signaling, we identified differential control of cardiac responses by these two subpopulations to high and low stress states. These findings provide novel insights into the unique properties of neurons responsible for cardiac sympathetic regulation, with implications for novel strategies to target specific neuronal subtypes for sympathetic blockade in cardiac disease.

    1. Neuroscience
    Hang Hu, Rachel E Hostetler, Ariel Agmon
    Research Article Updated

    Oscillations of extracellular voltage, reflecting synchronous, rhythmic activity in large populations of neurons, are a ubiquitous feature in the mammalian brain, and are thought to subserve important, if not fully understood roles in normal and abnormal brain function. Oscillations at different frequency bands are hallmarks of specific brain and behavioral states. At the higher end of the spectrum, 150-200 Hz ripples occur in the hippocampus during slow-wave sleep, and ultrafast (400-600 Hz) oscillations arise in the somatosensory cortices of humans and several other mammalian species in response to peripheral nerve stimulation or punctate sensory stimuli. Here we report that brief optogenetic activation of thalamocortical axons, in brain slices from mouse somatosensory (barrel) cortex, elicited in the thalamorecipient layer local field potential (LFP) oscillations which we dubbed “ripplets”. Ripplets originated in the postsynaptic cortical network and consisted of a precisely repeating sequence of 2‑5 negative transients, closely resembling hippocampal ripples but, at ~400 Hz, over twice as fast. Fast-spiking (FS) inhibitory interneurons fired highly synchronous 400 Hz spike bursts entrained to the LFP oscillation, while regular-spiking (RS), excitatory neurons typically fired only 1-2 spikes per ripplet, in antiphase to FS spikes, and received synchronous sequences of alternating excitatory and inhibitory inputs. We suggest that ripplets are an intrinsically generated cortical response to a strong, synchronous thalamocortical volley, and could provide increased bandwidth for encoding and transmitting sensory information. Importantly, optogenetically induced ripplets are a uniquely accessible model system for studying synaptic mechanisms of fast and ultrafast cortical and hippocampal oscillations.