The large-scale organization of shape processing in the ventral and dorsal pathways

  1. Erez Freud  Is a corresponding author
  2. Jody C Culham
  3. David C Plaut
  4. Marlene Behrmann
  1. Carnegie Mellon University, United States
  2. University of Western Ontario, Canada

Abstract

Although shape perception is considered a function of the ventral visual pathway, evidence suggests that the dorsal pathway also derives shape-based representations. In two psychophysics and neuroimaging experiments, we characterized the response properties, topographical organization and perceptual relevance of these representations. In both pathways, shape sensitivity increased from early visual cortex to extrastriate cortex but then decreased in anterior regions. Moreover, the lateral aspect of the ventral pathway and posterior regions of the dorsal pathway were sensitive to the availability of fundamental shape properties, even for unrecognizable images. This apparent representational similarity between the posterior-dorsal and lateral-ventral regions was corroborated by a multivariate analysis. Finally, as with ventral pathway, the activation profile of posterior dorsal regions was correlated with recognition performance, suggesting a possible contribution to perception. These findings challenge a strict functional dichotomy between the pathways and suggest a more distributed model of shape processing.

Data availability

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Erez Freud

    Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, United States
    For correspondence
    erezfreud@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3758-3855
  2. Jody C Culham

    The Brain and Mind Institute, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
    Competing interests
    Jody C Culham, Reviewing editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0754-2999
  3. David C Plaut

    Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Marlene Behrmann

    Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3814-1015

Funding

Israel Science Foundation (grant No. 65/15)

  • Erez Freud

Yad Hanadiv Postdoctoral Fellowship

  • Erez Freud

National Science Foundation (BCS-1354350)

  • David C Plaut
  • Marlene Behrmann

Pennsylvania Department of Health (Commonwealth Universal Research Enhancement Program)

  • David C Plaut

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP 130345)

  • Jody C Culham

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: As detailed in the manuscript, all subjects had normal or corrected-to-normal vision and were financially compensated for their participation. Informed consent and consent to publish was obtained in accordance with ethical standards set out by the Declaration of Helsinki (1964) and with procedures approved by the IRB committee of Carnegie Mellon University.

Copyright

© 2017, Freud et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,329
    views
  • 521
    downloads
  • 62
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Erez Freud
  2. Jody C Culham
  3. David C Plaut
  4. Marlene Behrmann
(2017)
The large-scale organization of shape processing in the ventral and dorsal pathways
eLife 6:e27576.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27576

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27576

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Maxine K Loh, Samantha J Hurh ... Mitchell F Roitman
    Research Article

    Mesolimbic dopamine encoding of non-contingent rewards and reward-predictive cues has been well established. Considerable debate remains over how mesolimbic dopamine responds to aversion and in the context of aversive conditioning. Inconsistencies may arise from the use of aversive stimuli that are transduced along different neural paths relative to reward or the conflation of responses to avoidance and aversion. Here, we made intraoral infusions of sucrose and measured how dopamine and behavioral responses varied to the changing valence of sucrose. Pairing intraoral sucrose with malaise via injection of lithium chloride (LiCl) caused the development of a conditioned taste aversion (CTA), which rendered the typically rewarding taste of sucrose aversive upon subsequent re-exposure. Following CTA formation, intraoral sucrose suppressed the activity of ventral tegmental area dopamine neurons (VTADA) and nucleus accumbens (NAc) dopamine release. This pattern of dopamine signaling after CTA is similar to intraoral infusions of innately aversive quinine and contrasts with responses to sucrose when it was novel or not paired with LiCl. Dopamine responses were negatively correlated with behavioral reactivity to intraoral sucrose and predicted home cage sucrose preference. Further, dopamine responses scaled with the strength of the CTA, which was increased by repeated LiCl pairings and weakened through extinction. Thus, the findings demonstrate differential dopamine encoding of the same taste stimulus according to its valence, which is aligned to distinct behavioral responses.