Single methyl groups can act as toggle switches to specify transmembrane protein-protein interactions

  1. Li He
  2. Helena Steinocher
  3. Ashish Shelar
  4. Emily B Cohen
  5. Erin N Heim
  6. Birthe B Kragelund
  7. Gevorg Grigoryan
  8. Daniel DiMaio  Is a corresponding author
  1. Yale School of Medicine, United States
  2. University of Copenhagen, Denmark
  3. Dartmouth College, United States

Abstract

Transmembrane domains (TMDs) engage in protein-protein interactions that regulate many cellular processes, but the rules governing the specificity of these interactions are poorly understood. To discover these principles, we analyzed 26-residue model transmembrane proteins consisting exclusively of leucine and isoleucine (called LIL traptamers) that specifically activate the erythropoietin receptor (EPOR) in mouse cells to confer growth factor independence. We discovered that the placement of a single side chain methyl group at specific positions in a traptamer determined whether it associated productively with the TMD of the human EPOR, the mouse EPOR, or both receptors. Association of the traptamers with the EPOR induced EPOR oligomerization in an orientation that stimulated receptor activity. These results highlight the high intrinsic specificity of TMD interactions, demonstrate that a single methyl group can dictate specificity, and define the minimal chemical difference that can modulate the specificity of TMD interactions and the activity of transmembrane proteins.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Li He

    Department of Genetics, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Helena Steinocher

    Department of Biology, Structural Biology and NMR Laboratory, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Ashish Shelar

    Department of Genetics, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Emily B Cohen

    Department of Genetics, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Erin N Heim

    Department of Genetics, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Birthe B Kragelund

    Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7454-1761
  7. Gevorg Grigoryan

    Department of Computer Science, Dartmouth College, Hanover, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Daniel DiMaio

    Department of Genetics, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    For correspondence
    daniel.dimaio@yale.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2060-5977

Funding

National Institutes of Health (R01 CA037157)

  • Daniel DiMaio

Lundbeckfonden (Lundbeck Foundation)

  • Birthe B Kragelund

Novo Nordisk Foundation (Novo Nordisk Foundation)

  • Birthe B Kragelund

National Institutes of Health (GM113132)

  • Gevorg Grigoryan

National Science Foundation (MCB151032)

  • Gevorg Grigoryan

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2017, He et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,672
    views
  • 363
    downloads
  • 16
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Li He
  2. Helena Steinocher
  3. Ashish Shelar
  4. Emily B Cohen
  5. Erin N Heim
  6. Birthe B Kragelund
  7. Gevorg Grigoryan
  8. Daniel DiMaio
(2017)
Single methyl groups can act as toggle switches to specify transmembrane protein-protein interactions
eLife 6:e27701.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27701

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27701

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Jie Luo, Jeff Ranish
    Tools and Resources

    Dynamic conformational and structural changes in proteins and protein complexes play a central and ubiquitous role in the regulation of protein function, yet it is very challenging to study these changes, especially for large protein complexes, under physiological conditions. Here, we introduce a novel isobaric crosslinker, Qlinker, for studying conformational and structural changes in proteins and protein complexes using quantitative crosslinking mass spectrometry. Qlinkers are small and simple, amine-reactive molecules with an optimal extended distance of ~10 Å, which use MS2 reporter ions for relative quantification of Qlinker-modified peptides derived from different samples. We synthesized the 2-plex Q2linker and showed that the Q2linker can provide quantitative crosslinking data that pinpoints key conformational and structural changes in biosensors, binary and ternary complexes composed of the general transcription factors TBP, TFIIA, and TFIIB, and RNA polymerase II complexes.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine
    Alejandro J Brenes, Eva Griesser ... Angus I Lamond
    Research Article

    Human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) have great potential to be used as alternatives to embryonic stem cells (hESCs) in regenerative medicine and disease modelling. In this study, we characterise the proteomes of multiple hiPSC and hESC lines derived from independent donors and find that while they express a near-identical set of proteins, they show consistent quantitative differences in the abundance of a subset of proteins. hiPSCs have increased total protein content, while maintaining a comparable cell cycle profile to hESCs, with increased abundance of cytoplasmic and mitochondrial proteins required to sustain high growth rates, including nutrient transporters and metabolic proteins. Prominent changes detected in proteins involved in mitochondrial metabolism correlated with enhanced mitochondrial potential, shown using high-resolution respirometry. hiPSCs also produced higher levels of secreted proteins, including growth factors and proteins involved in the inhibition of the immune system. The data indicate that reprogramming of fibroblasts to hiPSCs produces important differences in cytoplasmic and mitochondrial proteins compared to hESCs, with consequences affecting growth and metabolism. This study improves our understanding of the molecular differences between hiPSCs and hESCs, with implications for potential risks and benefits for their use in future disease modelling and therapeutic applications.