Medial thalamic stroke and its impact on familiarity and recollection

  1. Lola Danet  Is a corresponding author
  2. Jérémie Pariente
  3. Pierre Eustache
  4. Nicolas Raposo
  5. Igor Sibon
  6. Jean-François Albucher
  7. Fabrice Bonneville
  8. Patrice Péran
  9. Emmanuel J Barbeau
  1. Toulouse NeuroImaging Center, Université de Toulouse, Inserm, UPS, France; CHU Toulouse Purpan, Neurology department, Toulouse, France, France
  2. Toulouse NeuroImaging Center, Université de Toulouse, Inserm, UPS, France, France
  3. CHU Toulouse Purpan, Neurology department, Toulouse, France, France
  4. Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Neuroimaging, University of Bordeaux Victor Segalen, Bordeaux University Hospital, France, France
  5. Brain and Cognition Research Centre (CerCo), CNRS, University of Toulouse Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France, France

Abstract

Models of recognition memory have postulated that the mammillo-thalamic tract (MTT) / anterior thalamic nucleus (AN) complex would be critical for recollection while the Mediodorsal nucleus (MD) of the thalamus would support familiarity and indirectly also be involved in recollection (Aggleton et al., 2011). 12 patients with left thalamic stroke underwent a neuropsychological assessment, three verbal recognition memory tasks assessing familiarity and recollection each using different procedures and a high-resolution structural MRI. Patients showed poor recollection on all three tasks. In contrast, familiarity was spared in each task. No patient had significant AN lesions. Critically, a subset of 5 patients had lesions of the MD without lesions of the MTT. They also showed impaired recollection but preserved familiarity. Recollection is therefore impaired following MD damage, but familiarity is not. This suggests that models of familiarity, which assign a critical role to the MD, should be reappraised.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Lola Danet

    Neurosciences, Toulouse NeuroImaging Center, Université de Toulouse, Inserm, UPS, France; CHU Toulouse Purpan, Neurology department, Toulouse, France, Toulouse, France
    For correspondence
    lola.danet@inserm.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8507-6749
  2. Jérémie Pariente

    Neurosciences, Toulouse NeuroImaging Center, Université de Toulouse, Inserm, UPS, France; CHU Toulouse Purpan, Neurology department, Toulouse, France, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Pierre Eustache

    Neurosciences, Toulouse NeuroImaging Center, Université de Toulouse, Inserm, UPS, France, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Nicolas Raposo

    Neurosciences, CHU Toulouse Purpan, Neurology department, Toulouse, France, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Igor Sibon

    Neurology, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Neuroimaging, University of Bordeaux Victor Segalen, Bordeaux University Hospital, France, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Jean-François Albucher

    Neurosciences, CHU Toulouse Purpan, Neurology department, Toulouse, France, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Fabrice Bonneville

    Neurosciences, Toulouse NeuroImaging Center, Université de Toulouse, Inserm, UPS, France; CHU Toulouse Purpan, Neurology department, Toulouse, France, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Patrice Péran

    Neurosciences, Toulouse NeuroImaging Center, Université de Toulouse, Inserm, UPS, France, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Emmanuel J Barbeau

    Neurosciences, Brain and Cognition Research Centre (CerCo), CNRS, University of Toulouse Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

Toulouse teaching hospital dedicated grant. (Local funding hospital grant)

  • Jérémie Pariente

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: All participants provided written informed consent in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki to take part in this study, which was approved by the local institutional review board (Comité de Protection des Personnes Sud-Ouest et Outre-Mer no. 2-11-04).

Copyright

© 2017, Danet et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,464
    views
  • 219
    downloads
  • 23
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Lola Danet
  2. Jérémie Pariente
  3. Pierre Eustache
  4. Nicolas Raposo
  5. Igor Sibon
  6. Jean-François Albucher
  7. Fabrice Bonneville
  8. Patrice Péran
  9. Emmanuel J Barbeau
(2017)
Medial thalamic stroke and its impact on familiarity and recollection
eLife 6:e28141.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.28141

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.28141

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Scott Isherwood, Sarah A Kemp ... Birte Forstmann
    Research Article

    This study investigates the functional network underlying response inhibition in the human brain, particularly the role of the basal ganglia in successful action cancellation. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) approaches have frequently used the stop-signal task to examine this network. We merge five such datasets, using a novel aggregatory method allowing the unification of raw fMRI data across sites. This meta-analysis, along with other recent aggregatory fMRI studies, does not find evidence for the innervation of the hyperdirect or indirect cortico-basal-ganglia pathways in successful response inhibition. What we do find, is large subcortical activity profiles for failed stop trials. We discuss possible explanations for the mismatch of findings between the fMRI results presented here and results from other research modalities that have implicated nodes of the basal ganglia in successful inhibition. We also highlight the substantial effect smoothing can have on the conclusions drawn from task-specific general linear models. First and foremost, this study presents a proof of concept for meta-analytical methods that enable the merging of extensive, unprocessed, or unreduced datasets. It demonstrates the significant potential that open-access data sharing can offer to the research community. With an increasing number of datasets being shared publicly, researchers will have the ability to conduct meta-analyses on more than just summary data.

    1. Neuroscience
    Xing Xiao, Gagik Yeghiazaryan ... Anne Christine Hausen
    Short Report

    Orexin signaling in the ventral tegmental area and substantia nigra promotes locomotion and reward processing, but it is not clear whether dopaminergic neurons directly mediate these effects. We show that dopaminergic neurons in these areas mainly express orexin receptor subtype 1 (Ox1R). In contrast, only a minor population in the medial ventral tegmental area express orexin receptor subtype 2 (Ox2R). To analyze the functional role of Ox1R signaling in dopaminergic neurons, we deleted Ox1R specifically in dopamine transporter-expressing neurons of mice and investigated the functional consequences. Deletion of Ox1R increased locomotor activity and exploration during exposure to novel environments or when intracerebroventricularely injected with orexin A. Spontaneous activity in home cages, anxiety, reward processing, and energy metabolism did not change. Positron emission tomography imaging revealed that Ox1R signaling in dopaminergic neurons affected distinct neural circuits depending on the stimulation mode. In line with an increase of neural activity in the lateral paragigantocellular nucleus (LPGi) of Ox1RΔDAT mice, we found that dopaminergic projections innervate the LPGi in regions where the inhibitory dopamine receptor subtype D2 but not the excitatory D1 subtype resides. These data suggest a crucial regulatory role of Ox1R signaling in dopaminergic neurons in novelty-induced locomotion and exploration.