Medial thalamic stroke and its impact on familiarity and recollection

  1. Lola Danet  Is a corresponding author
  2. Jérémie Pariente
  3. Pierre Eustache
  4. Nicolas Raposo
  5. Igor Sibon
  6. Jean-François Albucher
  7. Fabrice Bonneville
  8. Patrice Péran
  9. Emmanuel J Barbeau
  1. Toulouse NeuroImaging Center, Université de Toulouse, Inserm, UPS, France; CHU Toulouse Purpan, Neurology department, Toulouse, France, France
  2. Toulouse NeuroImaging Center, Université de Toulouse, Inserm, UPS, France, France
  3. CHU Toulouse Purpan, Neurology department, Toulouse, France, France
  4. Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Neuroimaging, University of Bordeaux Victor Segalen, Bordeaux University Hospital, France, France
  5. Brain and Cognition Research Centre (CerCo), CNRS, University of Toulouse Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France, France

Abstract

Models of recognition memory have postulated that the mammillo-thalamic tract (MTT) / anterior thalamic nucleus (AN) complex would be critical for recollection while the Mediodorsal nucleus (MD) of the thalamus would support familiarity and indirectly also be involved in recollection (Aggleton et al., 2011). 12 patients with left thalamic stroke underwent a neuropsychological assessment, three verbal recognition memory tasks assessing familiarity and recollection each using different procedures and a high-resolution structural MRI. Patients showed poor recollection on all three tasks. In contrast, familiarity was spared in each task. No patient had significant AN lesions. Critically, a subset of 5 patients had lesions of the MD without lesions of the MTT. They also showed impaired recollection but preserved familiarity. Recollection is therefore impaired following MD damage, but familiarity is not. This suggests that models of familiarity, which assign a critical role to the MD, should be reappraised.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Lola Danet

    Neurosciences, Toulouse NeuroImaging Center, Université de Toulouse, Inserm, UPS, France; CHU Toulouse Purpan, Neurology department, Toulouse, France, Toulouse, France
    For correspondence
    lola.danet@inserm.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8507-6749
  2. Jérémie Pariente

    Neurosciences, Toulouse NeuroImaging Center, Université de Toulouse, Inserm, UPS, France; CHU Toulouse Purpan, Neurology department, Toulouse, France, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Pierre Eustache

    Neurosciences, Toulouse NeuroImaging Center, Université de Toulouse, Inserm, UPS, France, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Nicolas Raposo

    Neurosciences, CHU Toulouse Purpan, Neurology department, Toulouse, France, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Igor Sibon

    Neurology, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Neuroimaging, University of Bordeaux Victor Segalen, Bordeaux University Hospital, France, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Jean-François Albucher

    Neurosciences, CHU Toulouse Purpan, Neurology department, Toulouse, France, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Fabrice Bonneville

    Neurosciences, Toulouse NeuroImaging Center, Université de Toulouse, Inserm, UPS, France; CHU Toulouse Purpan, Neurology department, Toulouse, France, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Patrice Péran

    Neurosciences, Toulouse NeuroImaging Center, Université de Toulouse, Inserm, UPS, France, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Emmanuel J Barbeau

    Neurosciences, Brain and Cognition Research Centre (CerCo), CNRS, University of Toulouse Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

Toulouse teaching hospital dedicated grant. (Local funding hospital grant)

  • Jérémie Pariente

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: All participants provided written informed consent in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki to take part in this study, which was approved by the local institutional review board (Comité de Protection des Personnes Sud-Ouest et Outre-Mer no. 2-11-04).

Copyright

© 2017, Danet et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,411
    views
  • 217
    downloads
  • 20
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Lola Danet
  2. Jérémie Pariente
  3. Pierre Eustache
  4. Nicolas Raposo
  5. Igor Sibon
  6. Jean-François Albucher
  7. Fabrice Bonneville
  8. Patrice Péran
  9. Emmanuel J Barbeau
(2017)
Medial thalamic stroke and its impact on familiarity and recollection
eLife 6:e28141.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.28141

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.28141

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Bridget M Curran, Kelsey R Nickerson ... Le Ma
    Research Article

    The dorsal funiculus in the spinal cord relays somatosensory information to the brain. It is made of T-shaped bifurcation of dorsal root ganglion (DRG) sensory axons. Our previous study has shown that Slit signaling is required for proper guidance during bifurcation, but loss of Slit does not affect all DRG axons. Here, we examined the role of the extracellular molecule Netrin-1 (Ntn1). Using wholemount staining with tissue clearing, we showed that mice lacking Ntn1 had axons escaping from the dorsal funiculus at the time of bifurcation. Genetic labeling confirmed that these misprojecting axons come from DRG neurons. Single axon analysis showed that loss of Ntn1 did not affect bifurcation but rather altered turning angles. To distinguish their guidance functions, we examined mice with triple deletion of Ntn1, Slit1, and Slit2 and found a completely disorganized dorsal funiculus. Comparing mice with different genotypes using immunolabeling and single axon tracing revealed additive guidance errors, demonstrating the independent roles of Ntn1 and Slit. Moreover, the same defects were observed in embryos lacking their cognate receptors. These in vivo studies thus demonstrate the presence of multi-factorial guidance mechanisms that ensure proper formation of a common branched axonal structure during spinal cord development.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Sara Bitar, Timo Baumann ... Axel Methner
    Research Article

    Parkinson's disease (PD) is characterized by the progressive loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra of the midbrain. Familial cases of PD are often caused by mutations of PTEN-induced kinase 1 (PINK1) and the ubiquitin ligase Parkin, both pivotal in maintaining mitochondrial quality control. CISD1, a homodimeric mitochondrial iron-sulfur-binding protein, is a major target of Parkin-mediated ubiquitination. We here discovered a heightened propensity of CISD1 to form dimers in Pink1 mutant flies and in dopaminergic neurons from PINK1 mutation patients. The dimer consists of two monomers that are covalently linked by a disulfide bridge. In this conformation CISD1 cannot coordinate the iron-sulfur cofactor. Overexpressing Cisd, the Drosophila orthologue of CISD1, and a mutant Cisd incapable of binding the iron-sulfur cluster in Drosophila reduced climbing ability and lifespan. This was more pronounced with mutant Cisd and aggravated in Pink1 mutant flies. Complete loss of Cisd, in contrast, rescued all detrimental effects of Pink1 mutation on climbing ability, wing posture, dopamine levels, lifespan, and mitochondrial ultrastructure. Our results suggest that Cisd, probably iron-depleted Cisd, operates downstream of Pink1 shedding light on PD pathophysiology and implicating CISD1 as a potential therapeutic target.