Medial thalamic stroke and its impact on familiarity and recollection

  1. Lola Danet  Is a corresponding author
  2. Jérémie Pariente
  3. Pierre Eustache
  4. Nicolas Raposo
  5. Igor Sibon
  6. Jean-François Albucher
  7. Fabrice Bonneville
  8. Patrice Péran
  9. Emmanuel J Barbeau
  1. Toulouse NeuroImaging Center, Université de Toulouse, Inserm, UPS, France; CHU Toulouse Purpan, Neurology department, Toulouse, France, France
  2. Toulouse NeuroImaging Center, Université de Toulouse, Inserm, UPS, France, France
  3. CHU Toulouse Purpan, Neurology department, Toulouse, France, France
  4. Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Neuroimaging, University of Bordeaux Victor Segalen, Bordeaux University Hospital, France, France
  5. Brain and Cognition Research Centre (CerCo), CNRS, University of Toulouse Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France, France

Abstract

Models of recognition memory have postulated that the mammillo-thalamic tract (MTT) / anterior thalamic nucleus (AN) complex would be critical for recollection while the Mediodorsal nucleus (MD) of the thalamus would support familiarity and indirectly also be involved in recollection (Aggleton et al., 2011). 12 patients with left thalamic stroke underwent a neuropsychological assessment, three verbal recognition memory tasks assessing familiarity and recollection each using different procedures and a high-resolution structural MRI. Patients showed poor recollection on all three tasks. In contrast, familiarity was spared in each task. No patient had significant AN lesions. Critically, a subset of 5 patients had lesions of the MD without lesions of the MTT. They also showed impaired recollection but preserved familiarity. Recollection is therefore impaired following MD damage, but familiarity is not. This suggests that models of familiarity, which assign a critical role to the MD, should be reappraised.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Lola Danet

    Neurosciences, Toulouse NeuroImaging Center, Université de Toulouse, Inserm, UPS, France; CHU Toulouse Purpan, Neurology department, Toulouse, France, Toulouse, France
    For correspondence
    lola.danet@inserm.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8507-6749
  2. Jérémie Pariente

    Neurosciences, Toulouse NeuroImaging Center, Université de Toulouse, Inserm, UPS, France; CHU Toulouse Purpan, Neurology department, Toulouse, France, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Pierre Eustache

    Neurosciences, Toulouse NeuroImaging Center, Université de Toulouse, Inserm, UPS, France, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Nicolas Raposo

    Neurosciences, CHU Toulouse Purpan, Neurology department, Toulouse, France, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Igor Sibon

    Neurology, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Neuroimaging, University of Bordeaux Victor Segalen, Bordeaux University Hospital, France, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Jean-François Albucher

    Neurosciences, CHU Toulouse Purpan, Neurology department, Toulouse, France, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Fabrice Bonneville

    Neurosciences, Toulouse NeuroImaging Center, Université de Toulouse, Inserm, UPS, France; CHU Toulouse Purpan, Neurology department, Toulouse, France, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Patrice Péran

    Neurosciences, Toulouse NeuroImaging Center, Université de Toulouse, Inserm, UPS, France, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Emmanuel J Barbeau

    Neurosciences, Brain and Cognition Research Centre (CerCo), CNRS, University of Toulouse Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

Toulouse teaching hospital dedicated grant. (Local funding hospital grant)

  • Jérémie Pariente

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: All participants provided written informed consent in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki to take part in this study, which was approved by the local institutional review board (Comité de Protection des Personnes Sud-Ouest et Outre-Mer no. 2-11-04).

Copyright

© 2017, Danet et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,484
    views
  • 222
    downloads
  • 23
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Lola Danet
  2. Jérémie Pariente
  3. Pierre Eustache
  4. Nicolas Raposo
  5. Igor Sibon
  6. Jean-François Albucher
  7. Fabrice Bonneville
  8. Patrice Péran
  9. Emmanuel J Barbeau
(2017)
Medial thalamic stroke and its impact on familiarity and recollection
eLife 6:e28141.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.28141

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.28141

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Pál Barzó, Ildikó Szöts ... Gábor Tamás
    Research Article

    The basic excitatory neurons of the cerebral cortex, the pyramidal cells, are the most important signal integrators for the local circuit. They have quite characteristic morphological and electrophysiological properties that are known to be largely constant with age in the young and adult cortex. However, the brain undergoes several dynamic changes throughout life, such as in the phases of early development and cognitive decline in the aging brain. We set out to search for intrinsic cellular changes in supragranular pyramidal cells across a broad age range: from birth to 85 y of age and we found differences in several biophysical properties between defined age groups. During the first year of life, subthreshold and suprathreshold electrophysiological properties changed in a way that shows that pyramidal cells become less excitable with maturation, but also become temporarily more precise. According to our findings, the morphological features of the three-dimensional reconstructions from different life stages showed consistent morphological properties and systematic dendritic spine analysis of an infantile and an old pyramidal cell showed clear significant differences in the distribution of spine shapes. Overall, the changes that occur during development and aging may have lasting effects on the properties of pyramidal cells in the cerebral cortex. Understanding these changes is important to unravel the complex mechanisms underlying brain development, cognition, and age-related neurodegenerative diseases.

    1. Neuroscience
    Elissa Sutlief, Charlie Walters ... Marshall G Hussain Shuler
    Research Article

    Reward-rate maximization is a prominent normative principle in behavioral ecology, neuroscience, economics, and AI. Here, we identify, compare, and analyze equations to maximize reward rate when assessing whether to initiate a pursuit. In deriving expressions for the value of a pursuit, we show that time’s cost consists of both apportionment and opportunity cost. Reformulating value as a discounting function, we show precisely how a reward-rate-optimal agent’s discounting function (1) combines hyperbolic and linear components reflecting apportionment and opportunity costs, and (2) is dependent not only on the considered pursuit’s properties but also on time spent and rewards obtained outside the pursuit. This analysis reveals how purported signs of suboptimal behavior (hyperbolic discounting, and the Delay, Magnitude, and Sign effects) are in fact consistent with reward-rate maximization. To better account for observed decision-making errors in humans and animals, we then analyze the impact of misestimating reward-rate-maximizing parameters and find that suboptimal decisions likely stem from errors in assessing time’s apportionment—specifically, underweighting time spent outside versus inside a pursuit—which we term the ‘Malapportionment Hypothesis’. This understanding of the true pattern of temporal decision-making errors is essential to deducing the learning algorithms and representational architectures actually used by humans and animals.