Infants are superior in implicit crossmodal learning and use other learning mechanisms than adults

Abstract

During development internal models of the sensory world must be acquired which have to be continuously adapted later. We used event-related potentials (ERP) to test the hypothesis that infants extract crossmodal statistics implicitly while adults learn them when task relevant. Participants were passively exposed to frequent standard audio-visual combinations (A1V1, A2V2, p=0.35 each), rare recombinations of these standard stimuli (A1V2, A2V1, p=0.10 each), and a rare audio-visual deviant with infrequent auditory and visual elements (A3V3, p=0.10). While both six-month-old infants and adults differentiated between rare deviants and standards involving early neural processing stages only infants were sensitive to crossmodal statistics as indicated by a late ERP difference between standard and recombined stimuli. A second experiment revealed that adults differentiated recombined and standard combinations when crossmodal combinations were task relevant. These results demonstrate a heightened sensitivity for crossmodal statistics in infants and a change in learning mode from infancy to adulthood.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Sophie Rohlf

    Biological Psychology and Neuropsychology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
    For correspondence
    sophie.rohlf@uni-hamburg.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8947-5613
  2. Boukje Habets

    Biological Psychology and Neuropsychology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Marco von Frieling

    Biological Psychology and Neuropsychology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Brigitte Röder

    Biological Psychology and Neuropsychology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

H2020 European Research Council (ERC-2009-AdG 249425 CriticalBrainChanges)

  • Brigitte Röder

City of Hamburg (Crossmodal Learning)

  • Brigitte Röder

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: Parents (Experiment 1a) and participants (Experiment 1b/2a/2b) gave their written consent and were informed about their right to abort the experiment at any time. All experiments were performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki in 1964. The procedure was approved by the ethics board of the German Psychological Society (DGPs).

Copyright

© 2017, Rohlf et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,553
    views
  • 226
    downloads
  • 13
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Sophie Rohlf
  2. Boukje Habets
  3. Marco von Frieling
  4. Brigitte Röder
(2017)
Infants are superior in implicit crossmodal learning and use other learning mechanisms than adults
eLife 6:e28166.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.28166

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.28166

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Mirela Zaneva, Tao Coll-Martín ... Alyssa Hillary Zisk
    Feature Article

    Since its inception, the concept of neurodiversity has been defined in a number of different ways, which can cause confusion among those hoping to educate themselves about the topic. Learning about neurodiversity can also be challenging because there is a lack of well-curated, appropriately contextualized information on the topic. To address such barriers, we present an annotated reading list that was developed collaboratively by a neurodiverse group of researchers. The nine themes covered in the reading list are: the history of neurodiversity; ways of thinking about neurodiversity; the importance of lived experience; a neurodiversity paradigm for autism science; beyond deficit views of ADHD; expanding the scope of neurodiversity; anti-ableism; the need for robust theory and methods; and integration with open and participatory work. We hope this resource can support readers in understanding some of the key ideas and topics within neurodiversity, and that it can further orient researchers towards more rigorous, destigmatizing, accessible, and inclusive scientific practices.

    1. Neuroscience
    Jierui Qin, Tingting Yang ... Wei Zhang
    Research Article

    As the early step of food ingestion, the swallow is under rigorous sensorimotor control. Nevertheless, the mechanisms underlying swallow control at a molecular and circuitry level remain largely unknown. Here, we find that mutation of the mechanotransduction channel genes nompC, Tmc, or piezo impairs the regular pumping rhythm of the cibarium during feeding of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. A group of multi-dendritic mechanosensory neurons, which co-express the three channels, wrap the cibarium and are crucial for coordinating the filling and emptying of the cibarium. Inhibition of them causes difficulty in food emptying in the cibarium, while their activation leads to difficulty in cibarium filling. Synaptic and functional connections are detected between the pharyngeal mechanosensory neurons and the motor circuit that controls swallow. This study elucidates the role of mechanosensation in swallow, and provides insights for a better understanding of the neural basis of food swallow.