The human cytoplasmic dynein interactome reveals novel activators of motility

  1. Willam B Redwine
  2. Morgan E DeSantis
  3. Ian Hollyer
  4. Zaw Min Htet
  5. Phuoc Tien Tran
  6. Selene K Swanson
  7. Laurence Florens
  8. Michael P Washburn
  9. Samara L Reck-Peterson  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of California, San Diego, United States
  2. Northwestern University, United States
  3. Stowers Institute of Medical Research, United States
  4. Stowers Institute for Medical Research, United States

Abstract

In human cells, cytoplasmic dynein-1 is essential for long-distance transport of many cargos, including organelles, RNAs, proteins, and viruses, towards microtubule minus ends. To understand how a single motor achieves cargo specificity, we identified the human dynein interactome by attaching a promiscuous biotin ligase ("BioID") to seven components of the dynein machinery, including a subunit of the essential cofactor dynactin. This method reported spatial information about the large cytosolic dynein/dynactin complex in living cells. To achieve maximal motile activity and to bind its cargos, human dynein/dynactin requires "activators", of which only five have been described. We developed methods to identify new activators in our BioID data, and discovered that ninein and ninein-like are a new family of dynein activators. Analysis of the protein interactomes for six activators, including ninein and ninein-like, suggests that each dynein activator has multiple cargos.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Willam B Redwine

    Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Morgan E DeSantis

    Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Ian Hollyer

    Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Zaw Min Htet

    Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Phuoc Tien Tran

    Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Selene K Swanson

    Stowers Institute of Medical Research, Kansas City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Laurence Florens

    Stowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Michael P Washburn

    Stowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7568-2585
  9. Samara L Reck-Peterson

    Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, United States
    For correspondence
    sreckpeterson@ucsd.edu
    Competing interests
    Samara L Reck-Peterson, Reviewing editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1553-465X

Funding

National Institutes of Health (R01GM121772)

  • Willam B Redwine
  • Phuoc Tien Tran
  • Samara L Reck-Peterson

Howard Hughes Medical Institute (Faculty Scholar)

  • Morgan E DeSantis
  • Samara L Reck-Peterson

Simons Foundation (Faculty Scholar)

  • Morgan E DeSantis
  • Samara L Reck-Peterson

National Institutes of Health (R01GM107214)

  • Ian Hollyer
  • Samara L Reck-Peterson

Jane Coffin Childs Memorial Fund for Medical Research

  • Morgan E DeSantis

National Science Foundation

  • Zaw Min Htet

Stowers Institute for Medical Research

  • Selene K Swanson
  • Laurence Florens
  • Michael P Washburn

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2017, Redwine et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 9,067
    views
  • 1,443
    downloads
  • 135
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Willam B Redwine
  2. Morgan E DeSantis
  3. Ian Hollyer
  4. Zaw Min Htet
  5. Phuoc Tien Tran
  6. Selene K Swanson
  7. Laurence Florens
  8. Michael P Washburn
  9. Samara L Reck-Peterson
(2017)
The human cytoplasmic dynein interactome reveals novel activators of motility
eLife 6:e28257.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.28257

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.28257

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Physics of Living Systems
    Deb Sankar Banerjee, Shiladitya Banerjee
    Research Article

    Accurate regulation of centrosome size is essential for ensuring error-free cell division, and dysregulation of centrosome size has been linked to various pathologies, including developmental defects and cancer. While a universally accepted model for centrosome size regulation is lacking, prior theoretical and experimental works suggest a centrosome growth model involving autocatalytic assembly of the pericentriolar material. Here, we show that the autocatalytic assembly model fails to explain the attainment of equal centrosome sizes, which is crucial for error-free cell division. Incorporating latest experimental findings into the molecular mechanisms governing centrosome assembly, we introduce a new quantitative theory for centrosome growth involving catalytic assembly within a shared pool of enzymes. Our model successfully achieves robust size equality between maturing centrosome pairs, mirroring cooperative growth dynamics observed in experiments. To validate our theoretical predictions, we compare them with available experimental data and demonstrate the broad applicability of the catalytic growth model across different organisms, which exhibit distinct growth dynamics and size scaling characteristics.

    1. Cell Biology
    Jingjing Li, Xinyue Wang ... Vincent Archambault
    Research Article

    In animals, mitosis involves the breakdown of the nucleus. The reassembly of a nucleus after mitosis requires the reformation of the nuclear envelope around a single mass of chromosomes. This process requires Ankle2 (also known as LEM4 in humans) which interacts with PP2A and promotes the function of the Barrier-to-Autointegration Factor (BAF). Upon dephosphorylation, BAF dimers cross-bridge chromosomes and bind lamins and transmembrane proteins of the reassembling nuclear envelope. How Ankle2 functions in mitosis is incompletely understood. Using a combination of approaches in Drosophila, along with structural modeling, we provide several lines of evidence that suggest that Ankle2 is a regulatory subunit of PP2A, explaining how it promotes BAF dephosphorylation. In addition, we discovered that Ankle2 interacts with the endoplasmic reticulum protein Vap33, which is required for Ankle2 localization at the reassembling nuclear envelope during telophase. We identified the interaction sites of PP2A and Vap33 on Ankle2. Through genetic rescue experiments, we show that the Ankle2/PP2A interaction is essential for the function of Ankle2 in nuclear reassembly and that the Ankle2/Vap33 interaction also promotes this process. Our study sheds light on the molecular mechanisms of post-mitotic nuclear reassembly and suggests that the endoplasmic reticulum is not merely a source of membranes in the process, but also provides localized enzymatic activity.