Abstract

Here we report multiple lines of evidence for a comprehensive model of energy metabolism in the vertebrate eye. Metabolic flux, locations of key enzymes, and our finding that glucose enters mouse and zebrafish retinas mostly through photoreceptors support a conceptually new model for retinal metabolism. In this model, glucose from the choroidal blood passes through the retinal pigment epithelium to the retina where photoreceptors convert it to lactate. Photoreceptors then export the lactate as fuel for the retinal pigment epithelium and for neighboring Müller glial cells. We used human retinal epithelial cells to show that lactate can suppress consumption of glucose by the retinal pigment epithelium. Suppression of glucose consumption in the retinal pigment epithelium can increase the amount of glucose that reaches the retina. This framework for understanding metabolic relationships in the vertebrate retina provides new insights into the underlying causes of retinal disease and age-related vision loss.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Mark A Kanow

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Michelle M Giarmarco

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3344-4268
  3. Connor SR Jankowski

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Kristine Tsantilas

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Abbi L Engel

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Jianhai Du

    Department of Ophthalmology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Jonathan D Linton

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Christopher C Farnsworth

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Stephanie R Sloat

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Austin Rountree

    Department of Medicine, UW Diabetes Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Ian R Sweet

    Department of Medicine, UW Diabetes Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Ken J Lindsay

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Edward D Parker

    Department of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Susan E Brockerhoff

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Martin Sadilek

    Department of Chemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Jennifer R Chao

    Department of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6859-5552
  17. James B Hurley

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    For correspondence
    jbhhh@uw.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7754-0705

Funding

National Eye Institute (EY06641)

  • James B Hurley

National Eye Institute (EY017863)

  • James B Hurley

National Eye Institute (EY026030)

  • Jianhai Du
  • Jennifer R Chao

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Ralph DeBerardinis, UT Southwestern Medical Center, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal research was authorized by the University of Washington Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

Version history

  1. Received: May 22, 2017
  2. Accepted: September 12, 2017
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: September 13, 2017 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: September 27, 2017 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2017, Kanow et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 8,182
    views
  • 1,279
    downloads
  • 264
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Mark A Kanow
  2. Michelle M Giarmarco
  3. Connor SR Jankowski
  4. Kristine Tsantilas
  5. Abbi L Engel
  6. Jianhai Du
  7. Jonathan D Linton
  8. Christopher C Farnsworth
  9. Stephanie R Sloat
  10. Austin Rountree
  11. Ian R Sweet
  12. Ken J Lindsay
  13. Edward D Parker
  14. Susan E Brockerhoff
  15. Martin Sadilek
  16. Jennifer R Chao
  17. James B Hurley
(2017)
Biochemical adaptations of the retina and retinal pigment epithelium support a metabolic ecosystem in the vertebrate eye
eLife 6:e28899.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.28899

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.28899

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Ramona Weber, Chung-Te Chang
    Research Article

    Recent findings indicate that the translation elongation rate influences mRNA stability. One of the factors that has been implicated in this link between mRNA decay and translation speed is the yeast DEAD-box helicase Dhh1p. Here, we demonstrated that the human ortholog of Dhh1p, DDX6, triggers the deadenylation-dependent decay of inefficiently translated mRNAs in human cells. DDX6 interacts with the ribosome through the Phe-Asp-Phe (FDF) motif in its RecA2 domain. Furthermore, RecA2-mediated interactions and ATPase activity are both required for DDX6 to destabilize inefficiently translated mRNAs. Using ribosome profiling and RNA sequencing, we identified two classes of endogenous mRNAs that are regulated in a DDX6-dependent manner. The identified targets are either translationally regulated or regulated at the steady-state-level and either exhibit signatures of poor overall translation or of locally reduced ribosome translocation rates. Transferring the identified sequence stretches into a reporter mRNA caused translation- and DDX6-dependent degradation of the reporter mRNA. In summary, these results identify DDX6 as a crucial regulator of mRNA translation and decay triggered by slow ribosome movement and provide insights into the mechanism by which DDX6 destabilizes inefficiently translated mRNAs.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Amy H Andreotti, Volker Dötsch
    Editorial

    The articles in this special issue highlight how modern cellular, biochemical, biophysical and computational techniques are allowing deeper and more detailed studies of allosteric kinase regulation.