Lipid transfer from plants to arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi

  1. Andreas Keymer
  2. Priya Pimprikar
  3. Vera Wewer
  4. Claudia Huber
  5. Mathias Brands
  6. Simone L Bucerius
  7. Pierre-Marc Delaux
  8. Verena Klingl
  9. Edda von Röpenack-Lahaye
  10. Trevor L Wang
  11. Wolfgang Eisenreich
  12. Peter Dörmann
  13. Martin Parniske
  14. Caroline Gutjahr  Is a corresponding author
  1. LMU Munich, Biocenter Martinsried, Germany
  2. University of Cologne Biocenter, Germany
  3. Technical University Munich, Germany
  4. University of Bonn, Germany
  5. Unité Mixte de Recherche 5546, France
  6. University of Tübingen, Germany
  7. Norwich Research Park, United Kingdom

Abstract

Arbuscular mycorrhiza (AM) symbioses contribute to global carbon cycles as plant hosts divert up to 20% of photosynthate to the obligate biotrophic fungi. Previous studies suggested carbohydrates as the only form of carbon transferred to the fungi. However, de novo fatty acid (FA) synthesis has not been observed in AM fungi in absence of the plant. In a forward genetic approach, we identified two Lotus japonicus mutants defective in AM-specific paralogs of lipid biosynthesis genes (KASI and GPAT6). These mutants perturb fungal development and accumulation of emblematic fungal 16:1ω5 FAs. Using isotopolog profiling we demonstrate that 13C patterns of fungal FAs recapitulate those of wild-type hosts, indicating cross-kingdom lipid transfer from plants to fungi. This transfer of labelled FAs was not observed for the AM-specific lipid biosynthesis mutants. Thus, growth and development of beneficial AM fungi is not only fueled by sugars but depends on lipid transfer from plant hosts.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Andreas Keymer

    Faculty of Biology, Genetics, LMU Munich, Biocenter Martinsried, Martinsried, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Priya Pimprikar

    Faculty of Biology, Genetics, LMU Munich, Biocenter Martinsried, Martinsried, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Vera Wewer

    Mass Spectrometry Metabolomics Facility, Cluster of Excellence on Plant Sciences, University of Cologne Biocenter, Cologne, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Claudia Huber

    Biochemistry, Technical University Munich, Garching, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Mathias Brands

    Institute of Molecular Physiology and Biotechnology of Plants, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6548-1448
  6. Simone L Bucerius

    Faculty of Biology, Genetics, LMU Munich, Biocenter Martinsried, Martinsried, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Pierre-Marc Delaux

    Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité Mixte de Recherche 5546, Castanet Tolosan, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6211-157X
  8. Verena Klingl

    Faculty of Biology, Genetics, LMU Munich, Biocenter Martinsried, Martinsried, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Edda von Röpenack-Lahaye

    Analytics Facility, Center for Plant Molecular Biology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Trevor L Wang

    John Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Wolfgang Eisenreich

    Biochemistry, Technical University Munich, Garching, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Peter Dörmann

    Institute of Molecular Physiology and Biotechnology of Plants, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5845-9370
  13. Martin Parniske

    Faculty of Biology, Genetics, LMU Munich, Biocenter Martinsried, Martinsried, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8561-747X
  14. Caroline Gutjahr

    Faculty of Biology, Genetics, LMU Munich, Biocenter Martinsried, Martinsried, Germany
    For correspondence
    caroline.gutjahr@lmu.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6163-745X

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB924 B03 Function of the GRAS protein RAM1 in arbuscule development)

  • Caroline Gutjahr

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Emmy Noether program GU1423/1-1)

  • Caroline Gutjahr

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (PA493/7-1 Plant genes required for arbuscular mycorrhiza symbiosis)

  • Martin Parniske

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB924 B03 Genetic dissection of arbuscular mycorrhiza development)

  • Martin Parniske

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SPP1212)

  • Peter Dörmann

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Research Training Group GRK 2064 Do520/15-1)

  • Peter Dörmann

Hans Fischer Gesellschaft e. V.

  • Wolfgang Eisenreich

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council

  • Trevor L Wang

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2017, Keymer et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 10,927
    views
  • 1,898
    downloads
  • 360
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Andreas Keymer
  2. Priya Pimprikar
  3. Vera Wewer
  4. Claudia Huber
  5. Mathias Brands
  6. Simone L Bucerius
  7. Pierre-Marc Delaux
  8. Verena Klingl
  9. Edda von Röpenack-Lahaye
  10. Trevor L Wang
  11. Wolfgang Eisenreich
  12. Peter Dörmann
  13. Martin Parniske
  14. Caroline Gutjahr
(2017)
Lipid transfer from plants to arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi
eLife 6:e29107.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.29107

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.29107

Further reading

    1. Plant Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Théo Le Moigne, Martina Santoni ... Julien Henri
    Research Article

    The Calvin-Benson-Bassham cycle (CBBC) performs carbon fixation in photosynthetic organisms. Among the eleven enzymes that participate in the pathway, sedoheptulose-1,7-bisphosphatase (SBPase) is expressed in photo-autotrophs and catalyzes the hydrolysis of sedoheptulose-1,7-bisphosphate (SBP) to sedoheptulose-7-phosphate (S7P). SBPase, along with nine other enzymes in the CBBC, contributes to the regeneration of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate, the carbon-fixing co-substrate used by ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco). The metabolic role of SBPase is restricted to the CBBC, and a recent study revealed that the three-dimensional structure of SBPase from the moss Physcomitrium patens was found to be similar to that of fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase (FBPase), an enzyme involved in both CBBC and neoglucogenesis. In this study we report the first structure of an SBPase from a chlorophyte, the model unicellular green microalga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. By combining experimental and computational structural analyses, we describe the topology, conformations, and quaternary structure of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii SBPase (CrSBPase). We identify active site residues and locate sites of redox- and phospho-post-translational modifications that contribute to enzymatic functions. Finally, we observe that CrSBPase adopts distinct oligomeric states that may dynamically contribute to the control of its activity.

    1. Plant Biology
    Maryam Rahmati Ishka, Hayley Sussman ... Magdalena M Julkowska
    Research Article

    Soil salinity is one of the major threats to agricultural productivity worldwide. Salt stress exposure alters root and shoots growth rates, thereby affecting overall plant performance. While past studies have extensively documented the effect of salt stress on root elongation and shoot development separately, here we take an innovative approach by examining the coordination of root and shoot growth under salt stress conditions. Utilizing a newly developed tool for quantifying the root:shoot ratio in agar-grown Arabidopsis seedlings, we found that salt stress results in a loss of coordination between root and shoot growth rates. We identify a specific gene cluster encoding domain-of-unknown-function 247 (DUF247), and characterize one of these genes as Salt Root:shoot Ratio Regulator Gene (SR3G). Further analysis elucidates the role of SR3G as a negative regulator of salt stress tolerance, revealing its function in regulating shoot growth, root suberization, and sodium accumulation. We further characterize that SR3G expression is modulated by WRKY75 transcription factor, known as a positive regulator of salt stress tolerance. Finally, we show that the salt stress sensitivity of wrky75 mutant is completely diminished when it is combined with sr3g mutation. Together, our results demonstrate that utilizing root:shoot ratio as an architectural feature leads to the discovery of a new stress resilience gene. The study’s innovative approach and findings not only contribute to our understanding of plant stress tolerance mechanisms but also open new avenues for genetic and agronomic strategies to enhance crop environmental resilience.