Lipid transfer from plants to arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi

  1. Andreas Keymer
  2. Priya Pimprikar
  3. Vera Wewer
  4. Claudia Huber
  5. Mathias Brands
  6. Simone L Bucerius
  7. Pierre-Marc Delaux
  8. Verena Klingl
  9. Edda von Röpenack-Lahaye
  10. Trevor L Wang
  11. Wolfgang Eisenreich
  12. Peter Dörmann
  13. Martin Parniske
  14. Caroline Gutjahr  Is a corresponding author
  1. LMU Munich, Biocenter Martinsried, Germany
  2. University of Cologne Biocenter, Germany
  3. Technical University Munich, Germany
  4. University of Bonn, Germany
  5. Unité Mixte de Recherche 5546, France
  6. University of Tübingen, Germany
  7. Norwich Research Park, United Kingdom

Abstract

Arbuscular mycorrhiza (AM) symbioses contribute to global carbon cycles as plant hosts divert up to 20% of photosynthate to the obligate biotrophic fungi. Previous studies suggested carbohydrates as the only form of carbon transferred to the fungi. However, de novo fatty acid (FA) synthesis has not been observed in AM fungi in absence of the plant. In a forward genetic approach, we identified two Lotus japonicus mutants defective in AM-specific paralogs of lipid biosynthesis genes (KASI and GPAT6). These mutants perturb fungal development and accumulation of emblematic fungal 16:1ω5 FAs. Using isotopolog profiling we demonstrate that 13C patterns of fungal FAs recapitulate those of wild-type hosts, indicating cross-kingdom lipid transfer from plants to fungi. This transfer of labelled FAs was not observed for the AM-specific lipid biosynthesis mutants. Thus, growth and development of beneficial AM fungi is not only fueled by sugars but depends on lipid transfer from plant hosts.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Andreas Keymer

    Faculty of Biology, Genetics, LMU Munich, Biocenter Martinsried, Martinsried, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Priya Pimprikar

    Faculty of Biology, Genetics, LMU Munich, Biocenter Martinsried, Martinsried, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Vera Wewer

    Mass Spectrometry Metabolomics Facility, Cluster of Excellence on Plant Sciences, University of Cologne Biocenter, Cologne, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Claudia Huber

    Biochemistry, Technical University Munich, Garching, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Mathias Brands

    Institute of Molecular Physiology and Biotechnology of Plants, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6548-1448
  6. Simone L Bucerius

    Faculty of Biology, Genetics, LMU Munich, Biocenter Martinsried, Martinsried, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Pierre-Marc Delaux

    Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité Mixte de Recherche 5546, Castanet Tolosan, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6211-157X
  8. Verena Klingl

    Faculty of Biology, Genetics, LMU Munich, Biocenter Martinsried, Martinsried, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Edda von Röpenack-Lahaye

    Analytics Facility, Center for Plant Molecular Biology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Trevor L Wang

    John Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Wolfgang Eisenreich

    Biochemistry, Technical University Munich, Garching, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Peter Dörmann

    Institute of Molecular Physiology and Biotechnology of Plants, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5845-9370
  13. Martin Parniske

    Faculty of Biology, Genetics, LMU Munich, Biocenter Martinsried, Martinsried, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8561-747X
  14. Caroline Gutjahr

    Faculty of Biology, Genetics, LMU Munich, Biocenter Martinsried, Martinsried, Germany
    For correspondence
    caroline.gutjahr@lmu.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6163-745X

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB924 B03 Function of the GRAS protein RAM1 in arbuscule development)

  • Caroline Gutjahr

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Emmy Noether program GU1423/1-1)

  • Caroline Gutjahr

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (PA493/7-1 Plant genes required for arbuscular mycorrhiza symbiosis)

  • Martin Parniske

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB924 B03 Genetic dissection of arbuscular mycorrhiza development)

  • Martin Parniske

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SPP1212)

  • Peter Dörmann

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Research Training Group GRK 2064 Do520/15-1)

  • Peter Dörmann

Hans Fischer Gesellschaft e. V.

  • Wolfgang Eisenreich

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council

  • Trevor L Wang

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2017, Keymer et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 10,507
    views
  • 1,835
    downloads
  • 337
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Andreas Keymer
  2. Priya Pimprikar
  3. Vera Wewer
  4. Claudia Huber
  5. Mathias Brands
  6. Simone L Bucerius
  7. Pierre-Marc Delaux
  8. Verena Klingl
  9. Edda von Röpenack-Lahaye
  10. Trevor L Wang
  11. Wolfgang Eisenreich
  12. Peter Dörmann
  13. Martin Parniske
  14. Caroline Gutjahr
(2017)
Lipid transfer from plants to arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi
eLife 6:e29107.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.29107

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.29107

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Plant Biology
    Masanori Izumi, Sakuya Nakamura ... Shinya Hagihara
    Research Article

    Plants distribute many nutrients to chloroplasts during leaf development and maturation. When leaves senesce or experience sugar starvation, the autophagy machinery degrades chloroplast proteins to facilitate efficient nutrient reuse. Here, we report on the intracellular dynamics of an autophagy pathway responsible for piecemeal degradation of chloroplast components. Through live-cell monitoring of chloroplast morphology, we observed the formation of chloroplast budding structures in sugar-starved leaves. These buds were then released and incorporated into the vacuolar lumen as an autophagic cargo termed a Rubisco-containing body. The budding structures did not accumulate in mutants of core autophagy machinery, suggesting that autophagosome creation is required for forming chloroplast buds. Simultaneous tracking of chloroplast morphology and autophagosome development revealed that the isolation membranes of autophagosomes interact closely with part of the chloroplast surface before forming chloroplast buds. Chloroplasts then protrude at the site associated with the isolation membranes, which divide synchronously with autophagosome maturation. This autophagy-related division does not require DYNAMIN-RELATED PROTEIN 5B, which constitutes the division ring for chloroplast proliferation in growing leaves. An unidentified division machinery may thus fragment chloroplasts for degradation in coordination with the development of the chloroplast-associated isolation membrane.

    1. Plant Biology
    Koji Kato, Yoshiki Nakajima ... Ryo Nagao
    Research Article

    Photosynthetic organisms exhibit remarkable diversity in their light-harvesting complexes (LHCs). LHCs are associated with photosystem I (PSI), forming a PSI-LHCI supercomplex. The number of LHCI subunits, along with their protein sequences and pigment compositions, has been found to differ greatly among the PSI-LHCI structures. However, the mechanisms by which LHCIs recognize their specific binding sites within the PSI core remain unclear. In this study, we determined the cryo-electron microscopy structure of a PSI supercomplex incorporating fucoxanthin chlorophyll a/c-binding proteins (FCPs), designated as PSI-FCPI, isolated from the diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana CCMP1335. Structural analysis of PSI-FCPI revealed five FCPI subunits associated with a PSI monomer; these subunits were identified as RedCAP, Lhcr3, Lhcq10, Lhcf10, and Lhcq8. Through structural and sequence analyses, we identified specific protein–protein interactions at the interfaces between FCPI and PSI subunits, as well as among FCPI subunits themselves. Comparative structural analyses of PSI-FCPI supercomplexes, combined with phylogenetic analysis of FCPs from T. pseudonana and the diatom Chaetoceros gracilis, underscore the evolutionary conservation of protein motifs crucial for the selective binding of individual FCPI subunits. These findings provide significant insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying the assembly and selective binding of FCPIs in diatoms.