Detection of human disease conditions by single-cell morpho-rheological phenotyping of blood

Abstract

Blood is arguably the most important bodily fluid and its analysis provides crucial health status information. A first routine measure to narrow down diagnosis in clinical practice is the differential blood count, determining the frequency of all major blood cells. What is lacking to advance initial blood diagnostics is an unbiased and quick functional assessment of blood that can narrow down the diagnosis and generate specific hypotheses. To address this need, we introduce the continuous, cell-by-cell morpho-rheological (MORE) analysis of diluted whole blood, without labeling, enrichment or separation, at rates of 1,000 cells/sec. In a drop of blood we can identify all major blood cells and characterize their pathological changes in several disease conditions in vitro and in patient samples. This approach takes previous results of mechanical studies on specifically isolated blood cells to the level of application directly in blood and adds a functional dimension to conventional blood analysis.

Data availability

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Nicole Toepfner

    Center of Molecular and Cellular Bioengineering, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Christoph Herold

    Center of Molecular and Cellular Bioengineering, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    Christoph Herold, Owns shares of, and is full-time employed at, Zellmechanik Dresden GmbH, a company selling devices based on real-time deformability cytometry. The author has no other financial interests to declare. Zellmechanik Dresden GmbH did not have any role in the conception and planning of this study, or its preparation for publication.
  3. Oliver Otto

    Center of Molecular and Cellular Bioengineering, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    Oliver Otto, Owns shares of, and is part-time employed at, Zellmechanik Dresden GmbH, a company selling devices based on real-time deformability cytometry. The author has no other financial interests to declare. Zellmechanik Dresden GmbH did not have any role in the conception and planning of this study, or its preparation for publication.
  4. Philipp Rosendahl

    Center of Molecular and Cellular Bioengineering, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    Philipp Rosendahl, Owns shares of, and is part-time employed at, Zellmechanik Dresden GmbH, a company selling devices based on real-time deformability cytometry. The author has no other financial interests to declare. Zellmechanik Dresden GmbH did not have any role in the conception and planning of this study, or its preparation for publication.
  5. Angela Jacobi

    Center of Molecular and Cellular Bioengineering, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Martin Kräter

    Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Clinic Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7122-7331
  7. Julia Stächele

    Department of Pediatrics, University Clinic Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Leonard Menschner

    Department of Pediatrics, University Clinic Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Maik Herbig

    Center of Molecular and Cellular Bioengineering, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Laura Ciuffreda

    Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Lisa Ranford-Cartwright

    Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Michal Grzybek

    Paul Langerhans Institute, University Clinic Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Ünal Coskun

    Paul Langerhans Institute, University Clinic Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4375-3144
  14. Elisabeth Reithuber

    Department of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  15. Genevieve Garriss

    Department of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5361-0975
  16. Peter Mellroth

    Department of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  17. Birgitta Henriques Normark

    Department of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  18. Nicola Tregay

    Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  19. Meinolf Suttorp

    Department of Pediatrics, University Clinic Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  20. Martin Bornhäuser

    Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Clinic Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  21. Edwin R Chilvers

    Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4230-9677
  22. Reinhard Berner

    Department of Pediatrics, University Clinic Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  23. Jochen Guck

    Center of Molecular and Cellular Bioengineering, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    For correspondence
    jochen.guck@tu-dresden.de
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1453-6119

Funding

Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung (Alexander von Humboldt Professorship)

  • Jochen Guck

National Institute for Health Research (Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre)

  • Edwin R Chilvers

GlaxoSmithKline (noncommercial grant)

  • Edwin R Chilvers

Seventh Framework Programme (ERC Starting Grant #282060)

  • Jochen Guck

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (TRR83 and SFB655)

  • Ünal Coskun
  • Martin Bornhäuser

Seventh Framework Programme (ITN)

  • Lisa Ranford-Cartwright
  • Birgitta Henriques Normark
  • Jochen Guck

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD e.V.))

  • Ünal Coskun

Sächsisches Staatsministerium für Wissenschaft und Kunst (TG70 AZ 4-7531.60/29/45)

  • Oliver Otto
  • Jochen Guck

Tour der Hoffnung (noncommercial grant)

  • Julia Stächele

Sonnenstrahl e.V. Dresden (noncommercial grant)

  • Meinolf Suttorp

Center for Regenerative Therapies Dresden (Seed grant FZ 111)

  • Jochen Guck

Technische Universität Dresden (Support the Best Program)

  • Reinhard Berner
  • Jochen Guck

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: The work involved measurements of human blood samples. All studies complied with the Declaration of Helsinki and involved written informed consent from all participants or their legal guardians. Ethics for experiments with human blood were approved by the ethics committee of the Technische Universität Dresden (EK89032013, EK458102015), and for human blood and LPS inhalation in healthy volunteers by the East of England, Cambridge Central ethics committee (Study No. 06/Q0108/281 and ClinicalTrialReference NCT02551614).

Copyright

© 2018, Toepfner et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 7,113
    views
  • 884
    downloads
  • 129
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Nicole Toepfner
  2. Christoph Herold
  3. Oliver Otto
  4. Philipp Rosendahl
  5. Angela Jacobi
  6. Martin Kräter
  7. Julia Stächele
  8. Leonard Menschner
  9. Maik Herbig
  10. Laura Ciuffreda
  11. Lisa Ranford-Cartwright
  12. Michal Grzybek
  13. Ünal Coskun
  14. Elisabeth Reithuber
  15. Genevieve Garriss
  16. Peter Mellroth
  17. Birgitta Henriques Normark
  18. Nicola Tregay
  19. Meinolf Suttorp
  20. Martin Bornhäuser
  21. Edwin R Chilvers
  22. Reinhard Berner
  23. Jochen Guck
(2018)
Detection of human disease conditions by single-cell morpho-rheological phenotyping of blood
eLife 7:e29213.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.29213

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.29213

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Amy N Shore, Keyong Li ... Matthew C Weston
    Research Article

    More than 20 recurrent missense gain-of-function (GOF) mutations have been identified in the sodium-activated potassium (KNa) channel gene KCNT1 in patients with severe developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEEs), most of which are resistant to current therapies. Defining the neuron types most vulnerable to KCNT1 GOF will advance our understanding of disease mechanisms and provide refined targets for precision therapy efforts. Here, we assessed the effects of heterozygous expression of a Kcnt1 GOF variant (Kcnt1Y777H) on KNa currents and neuronal physiology among cortical glutamatergic and GABAergic neurons in mice, including those expressing vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP), somatostatin (SST), and parvalbumin (PV), to identify and model the pathogenic mechanisms of autosomal dominant KCNT1 GOF variants in DEEs. Although the Kcnt1Y777H variant had no effects on glutamatergic or VIP neuron function, it increased subthreshold KNa currents in both SST and PV neurons but with opposite effects on neuronal output; SST neurons became hypoexcitable with a higher rheobase current and lower action potential (AP) firing frequency, whereas PV neurons became hyperexcitable with a lower rheobase current and higher AP firing frequency. Further neurophysiological and computational modeling experiments showed that the differential effects of the Kcnt1Y777H variant on SST and PV neurons are not likely due to inherent differences in these neuron types, but to an increased persistent sodium current in PV, but not SST, neurons. The Kcnt1Y777H variant also increased excitatory input onto, and chemical and electrical synaptic connectivity between, SST neurons. Together, these data suggest differential pathogenic mechanisms, both direct and compensatory, contribute to disease phenotypes, and provide a salient example of how a pathogenic ion channel variant can cause opposite functional effects in closely related neuron subtypes due to interactions with other ionic conductances.

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Shristi Pawnikar, Brenda S Magenheimer ... Yinglong Miao
    Research Article

    Polycystin-1 (PC1) is the protein product of the PKD1 gene whose mutation causes autosomal dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease (ADPKD). PC1 is an atypical G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) with an autocatalytic GAIN domain that cleaves PC1 into extracellular N-terminal and membrane-embedded C-terminal (CTF) fragments. Recently, activation of PC1 CTF signaling was shown to be regulated by a stalk tethered agonist (TA), resembling the mechanism observed for adhesion GPCRs. Here, synthetic peptides of the first 9- (p9), 17- (p17), and 21-residues (p21) of the PC1 stalk TA were shown to re-activate signaling by a stalkless CTF mutant in human cell culture assays. Novel Peptide Gaussian accelerated molecular dynamics (Pep-GaMD) simulations elucidated binding conformations of p9, p17, and p21 and revealed multiple specific binding regions to the stalkless CTF. Peptide agonists binding to the TOP domain of PC1 induced close TOP-putative pore loop interactions, a characteristic feature of stalk TA-mediated PC1 CTF activation. Additional sequence coevolution analyses showed the peptide binding regions were consistent with covarying residue pairs identified between the TOP domain and the stalk TA. These insights into the structural dynamic mechanism of PC1 activation by TA peptide agonists provide an in-depth understanding that will facilitate the development of therapeutics targeting PC1 for ADPKD treatment.