The synaptic ribbon is critical for sound encoding at high rates and with temporal precision

  1. Philippe Jean
  2. David Lopez de la Morena
  3. Susann Michanski
  4. Lina María Jaime Tobón
  5. Rituparna Chakrabarti
  6. Maria Magdalena Picher
  7. Jakob Neef
  8. SangYong Jung
  9. Mehmet Gültas
  10. Stephan Maxeiner
  11. Andreas Neef  Is a corresponding author
  12. Carolin Wichmann  Is a corresponding author
  13. Nicola Strenzke  Is a corresponding author
  14. Chad Grabner  Is a corresponding author
  15. Tobias Moser  Is a corresponding author
  1. University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany
  2. University of Göttingen, Germany
  3. Georg-August-University Göttingen, Germany
  4. University of the Saarland, Germany
  5. Max Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization, Germany

Abstract

We studied the role of the synaptic ribbon for sound encoding at the synapses between inner hair cells (IHCs) and spiral ganglion neurons (SGNs) in mice lacking RIBEYE (RBEKO/KO). Electron and immunofluorescence microscopy revealed a lack of synaptic ribbons and an assembly of several small active zones (AZs) at each synaptic contact. Spontaneous and sound-evoked firing rates of SGNs and their compound action potential were reduced, indicating impaired transmission at ribbonless IHC-SGN synapses. The temporal precision of sound encoding was impaired and the recovery of SGN-firing from adaptation indicated slowed synaptic vesicle (SV) replenishment. Activation of Ca2+-channels was shifted to more depolarized potentials and exocytosis was reduced for weak depolarizations. Presynaptic Ca2+-signals showed a broader spread, compatible with the altered Ca2+-channel clustering observed by super-resolution immunofluorescence microscopy. We postulate that RIBEYE disruption is partially compensated by multi-AZ organization. The remaining synaptic deficit indicates ribbon function in SV-replenishment and Ca2+-channel regulation.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Philippe Jean

    Institute for Auditory Neuroscience, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. David Lopez de la Morena

    Institute for Auditory Neuroscience, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Susann Michanski

    Collaborative Research Center 889, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Lina María Jaime Tobón

    Institute for Auditory Neuroscience, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Rituparna Chakrabarti

    Collaborative Research Center 889, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Maria Magdalena Picher

    Institute for Auditory Neuroscience, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0722-3883
  7. Jakob Neef

    Institute for Auditory Neuroscience, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. SangYong Jung

    Institute for Auditory Neuroscience, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Mehmet Gültas

    Department of Breeding Informatics, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Stephan Maxeiner

    Institute for Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of the Saarland, Homburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Andreas Neef

    Bernstein Group Biophysics of Neural Computation, Max Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization, Göttingen, Germany
    For correspondence
    aneef@gwdg.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4445-7478
  12. Carolin Wichmann

    Collaborative Research Center 889, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
    For correspondence
    carolin.wichmann@med.uni-goettingen.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Nicola Strenzke

    Collaborative Research Center 889, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
    For correspondence
    nicola.strenzke@med.uni-goettingen.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Chad Grabner

    Institute for Auditory Neuroscience, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
    For correspondence
    chad.grabner@mpibpc.mpg.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Tobias Moser

    Institute for Auditory Neuroscience, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
    For correspondence
    tmoser@gwdg.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7145-0533

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Collaborative Research Center 889)

  • Carolin Wichmann
  • Nicola Strenzke
  • Tobias Moser

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Leibniz program MO 896/51)

  • Tobias Moser

Max-Planck-Gesellschaft (Max-Planck-Fellowship)

  • Tobias Moser

Niedersächsisches Vorab

  • Tobias Moser

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experiments complied with national animal care guidelines and were approved by the University of Göttingen Board for Animal Welfare and the Animal Welfare Office of the State of Lower Saxony (permit number: 14-1391).

Copyright

© 2018, Jean et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,015
    views
  • 644
    downloads
  • 98
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Philippe Jean
  2. David Lopez de la Morena
  3. Susann Michanski
  4. Lina María Jaime Tobón
  5. Rituparna Chakrabarti
  6. Maria Magdalena Picher
  7. Jakob Neef
  8. SangYong Jung
  9. Mehmet Gültas
  10. Stephan Maxeiner
  11. Andreas Neef
  12. Carolin Wichmann
  13. Nicola Strenzke
  14. Chad Grabner
  15. Tobias Moser
(2018)
The synaptic ribbon is critical for sound encoding at high rates and with temporal precision
eLife 7:e29275.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.29275

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.29275

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Chun-Wei Chen, Jeffery B Chavez ... Bruce J Nicholson
    Research Article

    Endometriosis is a debilitating disease affecting 190 million women worldwide and the greatest single contributor to infertility. The most broadly accepted etiology is that uterine endometrial cells retrogradely enter the peritoneum during menses, implant and form invasive lesions in a process analogous to cancer metastasis. However, over 90% of women suffer retrograde menstruation, but only 10% develop endometriosis, and debate continues as to whether the underlying defect is endometrial or peritoneal. Processes implicated in invasion include: enhanced motility; adhesion to, and formation of gap junctions with, the target tissue. Endometrial stromal (ESCs) from 22 endometriosis patients at different disease stages show much greater invasiveness across mesothelial (or endothelial) monolayers than ESCs from 22 control subjects, which is further enhanced by the presence of EECs. This is due to enhanced responsiveness of endometriosis ESCs to the mesothelium, which induces migration and gap junction coupling. ESC-PMC gap junction coupling is shown to be required for invasion, while coupling between PMCs enhances mesothelial barrier breakdown.

    1. Cell Biology
    Satoshi Ninagawa, Masaki Matsuo ... Kazutoshi Mori
    Research Advance

    How the fate (folding versus degradation) of glycoproteins is determined in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is an intriguing question. Monoglucosylated glycoproteins are recognized by lectin chaperones to facilitate their folding, whereas glycoproteins exposing well-trimmed mannoses are subjected to glycoprotein ER-associated degradation (gpERAD); we have elucidated how mannoses are sequentially trimmed by EDEM family members (George et al., 2020; 2021 eLife). Although reglucosylation by UGGT was previously reported to have no effect on substrate degradation, here we directly tested this notion using cells with genetically disrupted UGGT1/2. Strikingly, the results showed that UGGT1 delayed the degradation of misfolded substrates and unstable glycoproteins including ATF6α. An experiment with a point mutant of UGGT1 indicated that the glucosylation activity of UGGT1 was required for the inhibition of early glycoprotein degradation. These and overexpression-based competition experiments suggested that the fate of glycoproteins is determined by a tug-of-war between structure formation by UGGT1 and degradation by EDEMs. We further demonstrated the physiological importance of UGGT1, since ATF6α cannot function properly without UGGT1. Thus, our work strongly suggests that UGGT1 is a central factor in ER protein quality control via the regulation of both glycoprotein folding and degradation.