Orbitofrontal neurons signal sensory associations underlying model-based inference in a sensory preconditioning task

  1. Brian F Sadacca
  2. Heather M Wied
  3. Nina Lopatina
  4. Gurpreet K Saini
  5. Daniel Nemirovsky
  6. Geoffrey Schoenbaum  Is a corresponding author
  1. National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, United States

Abstract

Using knowledge of the structure of the world to infer value is at the heart of model-based reasoning and relies on a circuit that includes the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC). Some accounts link this to the representation of biological significance or value by neurons in OFC, while other models focus on the representation of associative structure or cognitive maps. Here we tested between these accounts by recording OFC neurons in rats during an OFC-dependent sensory preconditioning task. We found that while OFC neurons were strongly driven by biological significance or reward predictions at the end of training, they also showed clear evidence of acquiring the incidental stimulus-stimulus pairings in the preconditioning phase, prior to reward training. These results support a role for OFC in representing associative structure, independent of value.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Brian F Sadacca

    Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Heather M Wied

    Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Nina Lopatina

    Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Gurpreet K Saini

    Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Daniel Nemirovsky

    Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Geoffrey Schoenbaum

    Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, United States
    For correspondence
    geoffrey.schoenbaum@nih.gov
    Competing interests
    Geoffrey Schoenbaum, Reviewing editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8180-0701

Funding

National Institute on Drug Abuse (ZIA-DA000587)

  • Geoffrey Schoenbaum

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols (#15-CNRB-108) of the NIDA-IRP. The protocol was approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee (Permit Number: A4149-01). All surgery was performed under gas anesthesia, and every effort was made to minimize suffering.

Copyright

This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

Metrics

  • 2,995
    views
  • 448
    downloads
  • 79
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Brian F Sadacca
  2. Heather M Wied
  3. Nina Lopatina
  4. Gurpreet K Saini
  5. Daniel Nemirovsky
  6. Geoffrey Schoenbaum
(2018)
Orbitofrontal neurons signal sensory associations underlying model-based inference in a sensory preconditioning task
eLife 7:e30373.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.30373

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.30373

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Jacob A Miller
    Insight

    When navigating environments with changing rules, human brain circuits flexibly adapt how and where we retain information to help us achieve our immediate goals.

    1. Neuroscience
    Zhujun Shao, Mengya Zhang, Qing Yu
    Research Article

    When holding visual information temporarily in working memory (WM), the neural representation of the memorandum is distributed across various cortical regions, including visual and frontal cortices. However, the role of stimulus representation in visual and frontal cortices during WM has been controversial. Here, we tested the hypothesis that stimulus representation persists in the frontal cortex to facilitate flexible control demands in WM. During functional MRI, participants flexibly switched between simple WM maintenance of visual stimulus or more complex rule-based categorization of maintained stimulus on a trial-by-trial basis. Our results demonstrated enhanced stimulus representation in the frontal cortex that tracked demands for active WM control and enhanced stimulus representation in the visual cortex that tracked demands for precise WM maintenance. This differential frontal stimulus representation traded off with the newly-generated category representation with varying control demands. Simulation using multi-module recurrent neural networks replicated human neural patterns when stimulus information was preserved for network readout. Altogether, these findings help reconcile the long-standing debate in WM research, and provide empirical and computational evidence that flexible stimulus representation in the frontal cortex during WM serves as a potential neural coding scheme to accommodate the ever-changing environment.