Single-molecule force spectroscopy of protein-membrane interactions

  1. Lu Ma
  2. Yiying Cai
  3. Yanghui Li
  4. Junyi Jiao
  5. Zhenyong Wu
  6. Ben O'Shaughnessy
  7. Pietro De Camilli  Is a corresponding author
  8. Erdem Karatekin  Is a corresponding author
  9. Yongli Zhang  Is a corresponding author
  1. Yale University School of Medicine, United States
  2. Columbia University, United States

Abstract

Many biological processes rely on protein-membrane interactions in the presence of mechanical forces, yet high resolution methods to quantify such interactions are lacking. Here, we describe a single-molecule force spectroscopy approach to quantify membrane binding of C2 domains in Synaptotagmin-1 (Syt1) and Extended Synaptotagmin-2 (E-Syt2). Syts and E-Syts bind the plasma membrane via multiple C2 domains, bridging the plasma membrane with synaptic vesicles or endoplasmic reticulum to regulate membrane fusion or lipid exchange, respectively. In our approach, single proteins attached to membranes supported on silica beads are pulled by optical tweezers, allowing membrane binding and unbinding transitions to be measured with unprecedented spatiotemporal resolution. C2 domains from either protein resisted unbinding forces of 2-7 pN and had binding energies of 4-14 kBT per C2 domain. Regulation by bilayer composition or Ca2+ recapitulated known properties of both proteins. The method can be widely applied to study protein-membrane interactions.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Lu Ma

    Department of Cell Biology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Yiying Cai

    Department of Cell Biology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Yanghui Li

    Department of Cell Biology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Junyi Jiao

    Department of Cell Biology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Zhenyong Wu

    Department of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Ben O'Shaughnessy

    Department of Chemical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Pietro De Camilli

    Department of Cell Biology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    For correspondence
    pietro.decamilli@yale.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Erdem Karatekin

    Department of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    For correspondence
    erdem.karatekin@yale.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5934-8728
  9. Yongli Zhang

    Department of Cell Biology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    For correspondence
    yongli.zhang@yale.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7079-7973

Funding

National Institutes of Health (R01GM093341)

  • Yongli Zhang

Brain Research Foundation

  • Yongli Zhang

Kavli Foundation

  • Pietro De Camilli
  • Erdem Karatekin

Raymond and Beverly Sackler Institute for Biological, Physical and Engineering Sciences, Yale University (Seed Grant)

  • Erdem Karatekin
  • Yongli Zhang

National Institutes of Health (R01NS36251)

  • Pietro De Camilli

National Institutes of Health (DA018343)

  • Pietro De Camilli

National Institutes of Health (R01GM108954)

  • Erdem Karatekin

National Institutes of Health (R01GM114513)

  • Erdem Karatekin

National Institutes of Health (R01GM120193)

  • Yongli Zhang

Kavli Foundation (Kavli Neuroscience Scholar Award)

  • Erdem Karatekin

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2017, Ma et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,405
    views
  • 907
    downloads
  • 59
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Lu Ma
  2. Yiying Cai
  3. Yanghui Li
  4. Junyi Jiao
  5. Zhenyong Wu
  6. Ben O'Shaughnessy
  7. Pietro De Camilli
  8. Erdem Karatekin
  9. Yongli Zhang
(2017)
Single-molecule force spectroscopy of protein-membrane interactions
eLife 6:e30493.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.30493

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.30493

Further reading

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Manming Xu, Sarath Chandra Dantu ... Shozeb Haider
    Research Article

    The relationship between protein dynamics and function is essential for understanding biological processes and developing effective therapeutics. Functional sites within proteins are critical for activities such as substrate binding, catalysis, and structural changes. Existing computational methods for the predictions of functional residues are trained on sequence, structural, and experimental data, but they do not explicitly model the influence of evolution on protein dynamics. This overlooked contribution is essential as it is known that evolution can fine-tune protein dynamics through compensatory mutations either to improve the proteins’ performance or diversify its function while maintaining the same structural scaffold. To model this critical contribution, we introduce DyNoPy, a computational method that combines residue coevolution analysis with molecular dynamics simulations, revealing hidden correlations between functional sites. DyNoPy constructs a graph model of residue–residue interactions, identifies communities of key residue groups, and annotates critical sites based on their roles. By leveraging the concept of coevolved dynamical couplings—residue pairs with critical dynamical interactions that have been preserved during evolution—DyNoPy offers a powerful method for predicting and analysing protein evolution and dynamics. We demonstrate the effectiveness of DyNoPy on SHV-1 and PDC-3, chromosomally encoded β-lactamases linked to antibiotic resistance, highlighting its potential to inform drug design and address pressing healthcare challenges.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Andrew P Latham, Longchen Zhu ... Bin Zhang
    Research Article

    The phase separation of intrinsically disordered proteins is emerging as an important mechanism for cellular organization. However, efforts to connect protein sequences to the physical properties of condensates, that is, the molecular grammar, are hampered by a lack of effective approaches for probing high-resolution structural details. Using a combination of multiscale simulations and fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy experiments, we systematically explored a series of systems consisting of diblock elastin-like polypeptides (ELPs). The simulations succeeded in reproducing the variation of condensate stability upon amino acid substitution and revealed different microenvironments within a single condensate, which we verified with environmentally sensitive fluorophores. The interspersion of hydrophilic and hydrophobic residues and a lack of secondary structure formation result in an interfacial environment, which explains both the strong correlation between ELP condensate stability and interfacial hydrophobicity scales, as well as the prevalence of protein-water hydrogen bonds. Our study uncovers new mechanisms for condensate stability and organization that may be broadly applicable.