TRAIN (Transcription of Repeats Activates INterferon) in response to chromatin destabilization induced by small molecules in mammalian cells

  1. Katerina Leonova
  2. Alfiya Safina
  3. Elimelech Nesher
  4. Poorva Sandlesh
  5. Rachel Pratt
  6. Catherine Burkhart
  7. Brittany Lipchick
  8. Ilya Gitlin
  9. Costakis Frangou
  10. Igor Koman
  11. Jianmin Wang
  12. Kirill Kirsanov
  13. Marianna G Yakubovskaya
  14. Andrei V Gudkov
  15. Katerina Gurova  Is a corresponding author
  1. Roswell Park Cancer Institute, United States
  2. Buffalo BioLabs, United States
  3. Ariel University, Israel
  4. Blokhin Cancer Research Center, Russian Federation

Abstract

Cellular Responses to the loss of genomic stability are well-established, while how mammalian cells respond to chromatin destabilization is largely unknown. We previously found that DNA demethylation on p53-deficient background leads to transcription of repetitive heterochromatin elements, followed by an interferon response, a phenomenon we named TRAIN (Transcription of Repeats Activates INterferon). Here, we report that curaxin, an anticancer small molecule, destabilizing nucleosomes via disruption of histone/DNA interactions, also induces TRAIN. Furthermore, curaxin inhibits oncogene-induced transformation and tumor growth in mice in an interferon-dependent manner, suggesting that anti-cancer activity of curaxin, previously attributed to p53-activation and NF-kappaB-inhibition, may also involve induction of interferon response to epigenetic derepression of the cellular 'repeatome'. Moreover, we observed that another type of drugs decondensing chromatin, HDAC inhibitor, also induces TRAIN. Thus, we proposed that TRAIN may be one of the mechanisms ensuring epigenetic integrity of mammalian cells via elimination of cells with desilenced chromatin.

Data availability

The following data sets were generated
    1. Katerina Gurova
    (2017) Effect of CBL0137 on gene expression in mouse cells and tissues
    Publicly available at the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (accession no: GSE102768).

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Katerina Leonova

    Department of Cell Stress Biology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Alfiya Safina

    Department of Cell Stress Biology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Elimelech Nesher

    Department of Cell Stress Biology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8326-5535
  4. Poorva Sandlesh

    Department of Cell Stress Biology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Rachel Pratt

    Department of Cell Stress Biology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Catherine Burkhart

    Buffalo BioLabs, Buffalo, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Brittany Lipchick

    Department of Cell Stress Biology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Ilya Gitlin

    Department of Cell Stress Biology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Costakis Frangou

    Department of Cell Stress Biology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Igor Koman

    Department of Molecular Biology, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Jianmin Wang

    Department of Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Kirill Kirsanov

    Department of Chemical Carcinogenesis, Blokhin Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russian Federation
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Marianna G Yakubovskaya

    Department of Chemical Carcinogenesis, Blokhin Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russian Federation
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Andrei V Gudkov

    Department of Cell Stress Biology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Katerina Gurova

    Department of Cell Stress Biology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, United States
    For correspondence
    katerina.gurova@roswellpark.org
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9189-0712

Funding

National Cancer Institute (RO1CA197967)

  • Katerina Gurova

National Cancer Institute (R21CA198395)

  • Katerina Gurova

Russian Science Foundation (17-15-01526)

  • Marianna G Yakubovskaya

Roswell Park Cancer Center (P30CA016056)

  • Katerina Gurova

Incuron LLC

  • Katerina Gurova

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols (#1093M) of Roswell Park Cancer Institute. The protocol was approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of Roswell Park Cancer Institute.

Copyright

© 2018, Leonova et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,562
    views
  • 455
    downloads
  • 38
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Katerina Leonova
  2. Alfiya Safina
  3. Elimelech Nesher
  4. Poorva Sandlesh
  5. Rachel Pratt
  6. Catherine Burkhart
  7. Brittany Lipchick
  8. Ilya Gitlin
  9. Costakis Frangou
  10. Igor Koman
  11. Jianmin Wang
  12. Kirill Kirsanov
  13. Marianna G Yakubovskaya
  14. Andrei V Gudkov
  15. Katerina Gurova
(2018)
TRAIN (Transcription of Repeats Activates INterferon) in response to chromatin destabilization induced by small molecules in mammalian cells
eLife 7:e30842.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.30842

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.30842

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Evolutionary Biology
    Paul Richard J Yulo, Nicolas Desprat ... Heather L Hendrickson
    Research Article

    Maintenance of rod-shape in bacterial cells depends on the actin-like protein MreB. Deletion of mreB from Pseudomonas fluorescens SBW25 results in viable spherical cells of variable volume and reduced fitness. Using a combination of time-resolved microscopy and biochemical assay of peptidoglycan synthesis, we show that reduced fitness is a consequence of perturbed cell size homeostasis that arises primarily from differential growth of daughter cells. A 1000-generation selection experiment resulted in rapid restoration of fitness with derived cells retaining spherical shape. Mutations in the peptidoglycan synthesis protein Pbp1A were identified as the main route for evolutionary rescue with genetic reconstructions demonstrating causality. Compensatory pbp1A mutations that targeted transpeptidase activity enhanced homogeneity of cell wall synthesis on lateral surfaces and restored cell size homeostasis. Mechanistic explanations require enhanced understanding of why deletion of mreB causes heterogeneity in cell wall synthesis. We conclude by presenting two testable hypotheses, one of which posits that heterogeneity stems from non-functional cell wall synthesis machinery, while the second posits that the machinery is functional, albeit stalled. Overall, our data provide support for the second hypothesis and draw attention to the importance of balance between transpeptidase and glycosyltransferase functions of peptidoglycan building enzymes for cell shape determination.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Developmental Biology
    Pavan K Nayak, Arul Subramanian, Thomas F Schilling
    Research Article

    Mechanical forces play a critical role in tendon development and function, influencing cell behavior through mechanotransduction signaling pathways and subsequent extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling. Here we investigate the molecular mechanisms by which tenocytes in developing zebrafish embryos respond to muscle contraction forces during the onset of swimming and cranial muscle activity. Using genome-wide bulk RNA sequencing of FAC-sorted tenocytes we identify novel tenocyte markers and genes involved in tendon mechanotransduction. Embryonic tendons show dramatic changes in expression of matrix remodeling associated 5b (mxra5b), matrilin1 (matn1), and the transcription factor kruppel-like factor 2a (klf2a), as muscles start to contract. Using embryos paralyzed either by loss of muscle contractility or neuromuscular stimulation we confirm that muscle contractile forces influence the spatial and temporal expression patterns of all three genes. Quantification of these gene expression changes across tenocytes at multiple tendon entheses and myotendinous junctions reveals that their responses depend on force intensity, duration and tissue stiffness. These force-dependent feedback mechanisms in tendons, particularly in the ECM, have important implications for improved treatments of tendon injuries and atrophy.