TRAIN (Transcription of Repeats Activates INterferon) in response to chromatin destabilization induced by small molecules in mammalian cells

  1. Katerina Leonova
  2. Alfiya Safina
  3. Elimelech Nesher
  4. Poorva Sandlesh
  5. Rachel Pratt
  6. Catherine Burkhart
  7. Brittany Lipchick
  8. Ilya Gitlin
  9. Costakis Frangou
  10. Igor Koman
  11. Jianmin Wang
  12. Kirill Kirsanov
  13. Marianna G Yakubovskaya
  14. Andrei V Gudkov
  15. Katerina Gurova  Is a corresponding author
  1. Roswell Park Cancer Institute, United States
  2. Buffalo BioLabs, United States
  3. Ariel University, Israel
  4. Blokhin Cancer Research Center, Russian Federation

Abstract

Cellular Responses to the loss of genomic stability are well-established, while how mammalian cells respond to chromatin destabilization is largely unknown. We previously found that DNA demethylation on p53-deficient background leads to transcription of repetitive heterochromatin elements, followed by an interferon response, a phenomenon we named TRAIN (Transcription of Repeats Activates INterferon). Here, we report that curaxin, an anticancer small molecule, destabilizing nucleosomes via disruption of histone/DNA interactions, also induces TRAIN. Furthermore, curaxin inhibits oncogene-induced transformation and tumor growth in mice in an interferon-dependent manner, suggesting that anti-cancer activity of curaxin, previously attributed to p53-activation and NF-kappaB-inhibition, may also involve induction of interferon response to epigenetic derepression of the cellular 'repeatome'. Moreover, we observed that another type of drugs decondensing chromatin, HDAC inhibitor, also induces TRAIN. Thus, we proposed that TRAIN may be one of the mechanisms ensuring epigenetic integrity of mammalian cells via elimination of cells with desilenced chromatin.

Data availability

The following data sets were generated
    1. Katerina Gurova
    (2017) Effect of CBL0137 on gene expression in mouse cells and tissues
    Publicly available at the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (accession no: GSE102768).

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Katerina Leonova

    Department of Cell Stress Biology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Alfiya Safina

    Department of Cell Stress Biology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Elimelech Nesher

    Department of Cell Stress Biology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8326-5535
  4. Poorva Sandlesh

    Department of Cell Stress Biology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Rachel Pratt

    Department of Cell Stress Biology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Catherine Burkhart

    Buffalo BioLabs, Buffalo, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Brittany Lipchick

    Department of Cell Stress Biology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Ilya Gitlin

    Department of Cell Stress Biology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Costakis Frangou

    Department of Cell Stress Biology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Igor Koman

    Department of Molecular Biology, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Jianmin Wang

    Department of Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Kirill Kirsanov

    Department of Chemical Carcinogenesis, Blokhin Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russian Federation
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Marianna G Yakubovskaya

    Department of Chemical Carcinogenesis, Blokhin Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russian Federation
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Andrei V Gudkov

    Department of Cell Stress Biology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Katerina Gurova

    Department of Cell Stress Biology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, United States
    For correspondence
    katerina.gurova@roswellpark.org
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9189-0712

Funding

National Cancer Institute (RO1CA197967)

  • Katerina Gurova

National Cancer Institute (R21CA198395)

  • Katerina Gurova

Russian Science Foundation (17-15-01526)

  • Marianna G Yakubovskaya

Roswell Park Cancer Center (P30CA016056)

  • Katerina Gurova

Incuron LLC

  • Katerina Gurova

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols (#1093M) of Roswell Park Cancer Institute. The protocol was approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of Roswell Park Cancer Institute.

Copyright

© 2018, Leonova et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,547
    views
  • 452
    downloads
  • 33
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Katerina Leonova
  2. Alfiya Safina
  3. Elimelech Nesher
  4. Poorva Sandlesh
  5. Rachel Pratt
  6. Catherine Burkhart
  7. Brittany Lipchick
  8. Ilya Gitlin
  9. Costakis Frangou
  10. Igor Koman
  11. Jianmin Wang
  12. Kirill Kirsanov
  13. Marianna G Yakubovskaya
  14. Andrei V Gudkov
  15. Katerina Gurova
(2018)
TRAIN (Transcription of Repeats Activates INterferon) in response to chromatin destabilization induced by small molecules in mammalian cells
eLife 7:e30842.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.30842

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.30842

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Developmental Biology
    Sofía Suárez Freire, Sebastián Perez-Pandolfo ... Mariana Melani
    Research Article

    Eukaryotic cells depend on exocytosis to direct intracellularly synthesized material toward the extracellular space or the plasma membrane, so exocytosis constitutes a basic function for cellular homeostasis and communication between cells. The secretory pathway includes biogenesis of secretory granules (SGs), their maturation and fusion with the plasma membrane (exocytosis), resulting in release of SG content to the extracellular space. The larval salivary gland of Drosophila melanogaster is an excellent model for studying exocytosis. This gland synthesizes mucins that are packaged in SGs that sprout from the trans-Golgi network and then undergo a maturation process that involves homotypic fusion, condensation, and acidification. Finally, mature SGs are directed to the apical domain of the plasma membrane with which they fuse, releasing their content into the gland lumen. The exocyst is a hetero-octameric complex that participates in tethering of vesicles to the plasma membrane during constitutive exocytosis. By precise temperature-dependent gradual activation of the Gal4-UAS expression system, we have induced different levels of silencing of exocyst complex subunits, and identified three temporarily distinctive steps of the regulated exocytic pathway where the exocyst is critically required: SG biogenesis, SG maturation, and SG exocytosis. Our results shed light on previously unidentified functions of the exocyst along the exocytic pathway. We propose that the exocyst acts as a general tethering factor in various steps of this cellular process.

    1. Cell Biology
    Yue Miao, Yongtao Du ... Mei Ding
    Research Article

    The spatiotemporal transition of small GTPase Rab5 to Rab7 is crucial for early-to-late endosome maturation, yet the precise mechanism governing Rab5-to-Rab7 switching remains elusive. USP8, a ubiquitin-specific protease, plays a prominent role in the endosomal sorting of a wide range of transmembrane receptors and is a promising target in cancer therapy. Here, we identified that USP8 is recruited to Rab5-positive carriers by Rabex5, a guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) for Rab5. The recruitment of USP8 dissociates Rabex5 from early endosomes (EEs) and meanwhile promotes the recruitment of the Rab7 GEF SAND-1/Mon1. In USP8-deficient cells, the level of active Rab5 is increased, while the Rab7 signal is decreased. As a result, enlarged EEs with abundant intraluminal vesicles accumulate and digestive lysosomes are rudimentary. Together, our results reveal an important and unexpected role of a deubiquitinating enzyme in endosome maturation.