TRAIN (Transcription of Repeats Activates INterferon) in response to chromatin destabilization induced by small molecules in mammalian cells

  1. Katerina Leonova
  2. Alfiya Safina
  3. Elimelech Nesher
  4. Poorva Sandlesh
  5. Rachel Pratt
  6. Catherine Burkhart
  7. Brittany Lipchick
  8. Ilya Gitlin
  9. Costakis Frangou
  10. Igor Koman
  11. Jianmin Wang
  12. Kirill Kirsanov
  13. Marianna G Yakubovskaya
  14. Andrei V Gudkov
  15. Katerina Gurova  Is a corresponding author
  1. Roswell Park Cancer Institute, United States
  2. Buffalo BioLabs, United States
  3. Ariel University, Israel
  4. Blokhin Cancer Research Center, Russian Federation

Abstract

Cellular Responses to the loss of genomic stability are well-established, while how mammalian cells respond to chromatin destabilization is largely unknown. We previously found that DNA demethylation on p53-deficient background leads to transcription of repetitive heterochromatin elements, followed by an interferon response, a phenomenon we named TRAIN (Transcription of Repeats Activates INterferon). Here, we report that curaxin, an anticancer small molecule, destabilizing nucleosomes via disruption of histone/DNA interactions, also induces TRAIN. Furthermore, curaxin inhibits oncogene-induced transformation and tumor growth in mice in an interferon-dependent manner, suggesting that anti-cancer activity of curaxin, previously attributed to p53-activation and NF-kappaB-inhibition, may also involve induction of interferon response to epigenetic derepression of the cellular 'repeatome'. Moreover, we observed that another type of drugs decondensing chromatin, HDAC inhibitor, also induces TRAIN. Thus, we proposed that TRAIN may be one of the mechanisms ensuring epigenetic integrity of mammalian cells via elimination of cells with desilenced chromatin.

Data availability

The following data sets were generated
    1. Katerina Gurova
    (2017) Effect of CBL0137 on gene expression in mouse cells and tissues
    Publicly available at the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (accession no: GSE102768).

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Katerina Leonova

    Department of Cell Stress Biology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Alfiya Safina

    Department of Cell Stress Biology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Elimelech Nesher

    Department of Cell Stress Biology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8326-5535
  4. Poorva Sandlesh

    Department of Cell Stress Biology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Rachel Pratt

    Department of Cell Stress Biology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Catherine Burkhart

    Buffalo BioLabs, Buffalo, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Brittany Lipchick

    Department of Cell Stress Biology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Ilya Gitlin

    Department of Cell Stress Biology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Costakis Frangou

    Department of Cell Stress Biology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Igor Koman

    Department of Molecular Biology, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Jianmin Wang

    Department of Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Kirill Kirsanov

    Department of Chemical Carcinogenesis, Blokhin Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russian Federation
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Marianna G Yakubovskaya

    Department of Chemical Carcinogenesis, Blokhin Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russian Federation
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Andrei V Gudkov

    Department of Cell Stress Biology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Katerina Gurova

    Department of Cell Stress Biology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, United States
    For correspondence
    katerina.gurova@roswellpark.org
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9189-0712

Funding

National Cancer Institute (RO1CA197967)

  • Katerina Gurova

National Cancer Institute (R21CA198395)

  • Katerina Gurova

Russian Science Foundation (17-15-01526)

  • Marianna G Yakubovskaya

Roswell Park Cancer Center (P30CA016056)

  • Katerina Gurova

Incuron LLC

  • Katerina Gurova

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols (#1093M) of Roswell Park Cancer Institute. The protocol was approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of Roswell Park Cancer Institute.

Copyright

© 2018, Leonova et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,567
    views
  • 456
    downloads
  • 38
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Katerina Leonova
  2. Alfiya Safina
  3. Elimelech Nesher
  4. Poorva Sandlesh
  5. Rachel Pratt
  6. Catherine Burkhart
  7. Brittany Lipchick
  8. Ilya Gitlin
  9. Costakis Frangou
  10. Igor Koman
  11. Jianmin Wang
  12. Kirill Kirsanov
  13. Marianna G Yakubovskaya
  14. Andrei V Gudkov
  15. Katerina Gurova
(2018)
TRAIN (Transcription of Repeats Activates INterferon) in response to chromatin destabilization induced by small molecules in mammalian cells
eLife 7:e30842.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.30842

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.30842

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Keva Li, Nicholas Tolman ... UK Biobank Eye and Vision Consortium
    Research Article

    A glaucoma polygenic risk score (PRS) can effectively identify disease risk, but some individuals with high PRS do not develop glaucoma. Factors contributing to this resilience remain unclear. Using 4,658 glaucoma cases and 113,040 controls in a cross-sectional study of the UK Biobank, we investigated whether plasma metabolites enhanced glaucoma prediction and if a metabolomic signature of resilience in high-genetic-risk individuals existed. Logistic regression models incorporating 168 NMR-based metabolites into PRS-based glaucoma assessments were developed, with multiple comparison corrections applied. While metabolites weakly predicted glaucoma (Area Under the Curve = 0.579), they offered marginal prediction improvement in PRS-only-based models (p=0.004). We identified a metabolomic signature associated with resilience in the top glaucoma PRS decile, with elevated glycolysis-related metabolites—lactate (p=8.8E-12), pyruvate (p=1.9E-10), and citrate (p=0.02)—linked to reduced glaucoma prevalence. These metabolites combined significantly modified the PRS-glaucoma relationship (Pinteraction = 0.011). Higher total resilience metabolite levels within the highest PRS quartile corresponded to lower glaucoma prevalence (Odds Ratiohighest vs. lowest total resilience metabolite quartile=0.71, 95% Confidence Interval = 0.64–0.80). As pyruvate is a foundational metabolite linking glycolysis to tricarboxylic acid cycle metabolism and ATP generation, we pursued experimental validation for this putative resilience biomarker in a human-relevant Mus musculus glaucoma model. Dietary pyruvate mitigated elevated intraocular pressure (p=0.002) and optic nerve damage (p<0.0003) in Lmx1bV265D mice. These findings highlight the protective role of pyruvate-related metabolism against glaucoma and suggest potential avenues for therapeutic intervention.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Immunology and Inflammation
    Alejandro Rosell, Agata Adelajda Krygowska ... Esther Castellano Sanchez
    Research Article

    Macrophages are crucial in the body’s inflammatory response, with tightly regulated functions for optimal immune system performance. Our study reveals that the RAS–p110α signalling pathway, known for its involvement in various biological processes and tumourigenesis, regulates two vital aspects of the inflammatory response in macrophages: the initial monocyte movement and later-stage lysosomal function. Disrupting this pathway, either in a mouse model or through drug intervention, hampers the inflammatory response, leading to delayed resolution and the development of more severe acute inflammatory reactions in live models. This discovery uncovers a previously unknown role of the p110α isoform in immune regulation within macrophages, offering insight into the complex mechanisms governing their function during inflammation and opening new avenues for modulating inflammatory responses.