Ecological multiplex interactions determine the role of species for parasite spread amplification

  1. Massimo Stella
  2. Sanja Selakovic
  3. Alberto Antonioni
  4. Cecilia Andreazzi  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Southampton, United Kingdom
  2. Utrecht University, Netherlands
  3. University College London, United Kingdom
  4. Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Brazil

Abstract

Despite their potential interplay, multiple routes of many disease transmissions are often investigated separately. As an unifying framework for understanding parasite spread through interdependent transmission paths, we present the 'ecomultiplex' model, where the multiple transmission paths among a diverse community of interacting hosts are represented as a spatially explicit multiplex network. We adopt this framework for designing and testing potential control strategies for T. cruzi spread in two empirical host communities. We show that the ecomultiplex model is an efficient and low data-demanding method to identify which species enhances parasite spread and should thus be a target for control strategies. We also find that the interplay between predator-prey and host-parasite interactions leads to a phenomenon of parasite amplification, in which top predators facilitate T. cruzi spread, offering a mechanistic interpretation of previous empirical findings. Our approach can provide novel insights in understanding and controlling parasite spreading in real-world complex systems.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and appendices.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Massimo Stella

    Institute for Complex Systems Simulation, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Sanja Selakovic

    Faculty of Geociences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Alberto Antonioni

    Department of Economics, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Cecilia Andreazzi

    Fiocruz Mata Atlântica, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
    For correspondence
    cecilia.andreazzi@fiocruz.br
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9817-0635

Funding

Swiss National Science Foundation (P2LAP1-161864)

  • Alberto Antonioni

Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (645.000.013)

  • Sanja Selakovic

Engineer Research and Development Center (EP/G03690X/1)

  • Massimo Stella

Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (647570)

  • Sanja Selakovic

Swiss National Science Foundation (P300P1-171537)

  • Alberto Antonioni

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Nicole Gottdenker, University of Georgia, United States

Version history

  1. Received: October 15, 2017
  2. Accepted: April 20, 2018
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: April 23, 2018 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: May 21, 2018 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2018, Stella et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,417
    Page views
  • 225
    Downloads
  • 10
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Massimo Stella
  2. Sanja Selakovic
  3. Alberto Antonioni
  4. Cecilia Andreazzi
(2018)
Ecological multiplex interactions determine the role of species for parasite spread amplification
eLife 7:e32814.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.32814

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.32814

Further reading

    1. Ecology
    Yongzhi Yan, Scott Jarvie, Qing Zhang
    Research Article

    Habitat loss and fragmentation per se have been shown to be a major threat to global biodiversity and ecosystem function. However, little is known about how habitat loss and fragmentation per se alters the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem function (BEF relationship) in the natural landscape context. Based on 130 landscapes identified by a stratified random sampling in the agro-pastoral ecotone of northern China, we investigated the effects of landscape context (habitat loss and fragmentation per se) on plant richness, above-ground biomass, and the relationship between them in grassland communities using a structural equation model. We found that habitat loss directly decreased plant richness and hence decreased above-ground biomass, while fragmentation per se directly increased plant richness and hence increased above-ground biomass. Fragmentation per se also directly decreased soil water content and hence decreased above-ground biomass. Meanwhile, habitat loss decreased the magnitude of the positive relationship between plant richness and above-ground biomass by reducing the percentage of grassland specialists in the community, while fragmentation per se had no significant modulating effect on this relationship. These results demonstrate that habitat loss and fragmentation per se have inconsistent effects on BEF, with the BEF relationship being modulated by landscape context. Our findings emphasise that habitat loss rather than fragmentation per se can weaken the positive BEF relationship by decreasing the degree of habitat specialisation of the community.

    1. Ecology
    Anna L Erdei, Aneth B David ... Teun Dekker
    Research Article

    Over two decades ago, an intercropping strategy was developed that received critical acclaim for synergizing food security with ecosystem resilience in smallholder farming. The push-pull strategy reportedly suppresses lepidopteran pests in maize through a combination of a repellent intercrop (push), commonly Desmodium spp., and an attractive, border crop (pull). Key in the system is the intercrop's constitutive release of volatile terpenoids that repel herbivores. However, the earlier described volatiles were not detectable in the headspace of Desmodium, and only minimally upon herbivory. This was independent of soil type, microbiome composition, and whether collections were made in the laboratory or in the field. Further, in oviposition choice tests in a wind tunnel, maize with or without an odor background of Desmodium was equally attractive for the invasive pest Spodoptera frugiperda. In search of an alternative mechanism, we found that neonate larvae strongly preferred Desmodium over maize. However, their development stagnated and no larva survived. In addition, older larvae were frequently seen impaled and immobilized by the dense network of silica-fortified, non-glandular trichomes. Thus, our data suggest that Desmodium may act through intercepting and decimating dispersing larval offspring rather than adult deterrence. As a hallmark of sustainable pest control, maize-Desmodium push-pull intercropping has inspired countless efforts to emulate stimulo-deterrent diversion in other cropping systems. However, detailed knowledge of the actual mechanisms is required to rationally improve the strategy, and translate the concept to other cropping systems.