The representational dynamics of task and object processing in humans

  1. Martin N Hebart  Is a corresponding author
  2. Brett B Bankson
  3. Assaf Harel
  4. Chris I Baker
  5. Radoslaw M Cichy
  1. National Institute of Mental Health, United States
  2. Wright State University, United States
  3. Free University of Berlin, Germany

Abstract

Despite the importance of an observer's goals in determining how a visual object is categorized, surprisingly little is known about how humans process the task context in which objects occur and how it may interact with the processing of objects. Using magnetoencephalography (MEG), functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and multivariate techniques, we studied the spatial and temporal dynamics of task and object processing. Our results reveal a sequence of separate but overlapping task-related processes spread across frontoparietal and occipitotemporal cortex. Task exhibited late effects on object processing by selectively enhancing task-relevant object features, with limited impact on the overall pattern of object representations. Combining MEG and fMRI data, we reveal a parallel rise in task-related signals throughout the cerebral cortex, with an increasing dominance of task over object representations from early to higher visual areas. Collectively, our results reveal the complex dynamics underlying task and object representations throughout human cortex.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Martin N Hebart

    Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, United States
    For correspondence
    martin.hebart@nih.gov
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7257-428X
  2. Brett B Bankson

    Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7663-3918
  3. Assaf Harel

    Department of Psychology, Wright State University, Dayton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Chris I Baker

    Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6861-8964
  5. Radoslaw M Cichy

    Department of Education and Psychology, Free University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

National Institutes of Health

  • Martin N Hebart
  • Brett B Bankson
  • Chris I Baker

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

  • Radoslaw M Cichy

Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung

  • Martin N Hebart

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Jody C Culham, University of Western Ontario, Canada

Ethics

Human subjects: All participants gave written informed consent as part of the study protocol (93-M-0170, NCT00001360) prior to participation in the study. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the National Institutes of Health and was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki.

Version history

  1. Received: October 14, 2017
  2. Accepted: January 30, 2018
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: January 31, 2018 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: February 13, 2018 (version 2)

Copyright

This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

Metrics

  • 5,643
    views
  • 830
    downloads
  • 127
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Martin N Hebart
  2. Brett B Bankson
  3. Assaf Harel
  4. Chris I Baker
  5. Radoslaw M Cichy
(2018)
The representational dynamics of task and object processing in humans
eLife 7:e32816.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.32816

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.32816

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Alastair MacDonald, Alina Hebling ... Kevin Yackle
    Research Article

    Intonation in speech is the control of vocal pitch to layer expressive meaning to communication, like increasing pitch to indicate a question. Also, stereotyped patterns of pitch are used to create distinct sounds with different denotations, like in tonal languages and, perhaps, the 10 sounds in the murine lexicon. A basic tone is created by exhalation through a constricted laryngeal voice box, and it is thought that more complex utterances are produced solely by dynamic changes in laryngeal tension. But perhaps, the shifting pitch also results from altering the swiftness of exhalation. Consistent with the latter model, we describe that intonation in most vocalization types follows deviations in exhalation that appear to be generated by the re-activation of the cardinal breathing muscle for inspiration. We also show that the brainstem vocalization central pattern generator, the iRO, can create this breath pattern. Consequently, ectopic activation of the iRO not only induces phonation, but also the pitch patterns that compose most of the vocalizations in the murine lexicon. These results reveal a novel brainstem mechanism for intonation.

    1. Neuroscience
    Anna K Gillespie, Daniela Astudillo Maya ... Loren M Frank
    Research Article

    Hippocampal replay – the time-compressed, sequential reactivation of ensembles of neurons related to past experience – is a key neural mechanism of memory consolidation. Replay typically coincides with a characteristic pattern of local field potential activity, the sharp-wave ripple (SWR). Reduced SWR rates are associated with cognitive impairment in multiple models of neurodegenerative disease, suggesting that a clinically viable intervention to promote SWRs and replay would prove beneficial. We therefore developed a neurofeedback paradigm for rat subjects in which SWR detection triggered rapid positive feedback in the context of a memory-dependent task. This training protocol increased the prevalence of task-relevant replay during the targeted neurofeedback period by changing the temporal dynamics of SWR occurrence. This increase was also associated with neural and behavioral forms of compensation after the targeted period. These findings reveal short-timescale regulation of SWR generation and demonstrate that neurofeedback is an effective strategy for modulating hippocampal replay.