Control of endothelial cell polarity and sprouting angiogenesis by non-centrosomal microtubules

  1. Maud Martin
  2. Alexandra Veloso
  3. Jingchao Wu
  4. Eugene A Katrukha
  5. Anna Akhmanova  Is a corresponding author
  1. Utrecht University, Netherlands
  2. University of Liège, Belgium

Abstract

Microtubules control different aspects of cell polarization. In cells with a radial microtubule system, a pivotal role in setting up asymmetry is attributed to the relative positioning of the centrosome and the nucleus. Here, we show that centrosome loss had no effect on the ability of endothelial cells to polarize and move in 2D and 3D environments. In contrast, non-centrosomal microtubules stabilized by the microtubule minus-end-binding protein CAMSAP2 were required for directional migration on 2D substrates and for the establishment of polarized cell morphology in soft 3D matrices. CAMSAP2 was also important for persistent endothelial cell sprouting during in vivo zebrafish vessel development. In the absence of CAMSAP2, cell polarization in 3D could be partly rescued by centrosome depletion, indicating that in these conditions the centrosome inhibited cell polarity. We propose that CAMSAP2-protected non-centrosomal microtubules are needed for establishing cell asymmetry by enabling microtubule enrichment in a single cell protrusion.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Maud Martin

    Department of Biology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Alexandra Veloso

    Interdisciplinary Cluster for Applied Genoproteomics (GIGA-R), University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Jingchao Wu

    Department of Biology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Eugene A Katrukha

    Department of Biology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Anna Akhmanova

    Department of Biology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
    For correspondence
    a.akhmanova@uu.nl
    Competing interests
    Anna Akhmanova, Senior editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9048-8614

Funding

European Research Council (Synergy 609822)

  • Anna Akhmanova

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (ALW Open Program grant 824.15.017)

  • Anna Akhmanova

Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions (IEF fellowship)

  • Maud Martin

China Scholarship Council (PhD fellowship)

  • Jingchao Wu

Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS (FRIA fellowship)

  • Alexandra Veloso

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Pekka Lappalainen, University of Helsinki, Finland

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal experiments were approved by the animal welfare committee of the University of Liege (protocol number 14-1556, laboratory agreement number LA 1610002).

Version history

  1. Received: November 26, 2017
  2. Accepted: March 13, 2018
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: March 16, 2018 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: April 13, 2018 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2018, Martin et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 6,590
    views
  • 1,079
    downloads
  • 60
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Maud Martin
  2. Alexandra Veloso
  3. Jingchao Wu
  4. Eugene A Katrukha
  5. Anna Akhmanova
(2018)
Control of endothelial cell polarity and sprouting angiogenesis by non-centrosomal microtubules
eLife 7:e33864.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.33864

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.33864

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Camille Dantzer, Justine Vaché ... Violaine Moreau
    Research Article

    Immune checkpoint inhibitors have produced encouraging results in cancer patients. However, the majority of ß-catenin-mutated tumors have been described as lacking immune infiltrates and resistant to immunotherapy. The mechanisms by which oncogenic ß-catenin affects immune surveillance remain unclear. Herein, we highlighted the involvement of ß-catenin in the regulation of the exosomal pathway and, by extension, in immune/cancer cell communication in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We showed that mutated ß-catenin represses expression of SDC4 and RAB27A, two main actors in exosome biogenesis, in both liver cancer cell lines and HCC patient samples. Using nanoparticle tracking analysis and live-cell imaging, we further demonstrated that activated ß-catenin represses exosome release. Then, we demonstrated in 3D spheroid models that activation of β-catenin promotes a decrease in immune cell infiltration through a defect in exosome secretion. Taken together, our results provide the first evidence that oncogenic ß-catenin plays a key role in exosome biogenesis. Our study gives new insight into the impact of ß-catenin mutations on tumor microenvironment remodeling, which could lead to the development of new strategies to enhance immunotherapeutic response.

    1. Cell Biology
    Zhongyun Xie, Yongping Chai ... Wei Li
    Research Article

    Asymmetric cell divisions (ACDs) generate two daughter cells with identical genetic information but distinct cell fates through epigenetic mechanisms. However, the process of partitioning different epigenetic information into daughter cells remains unclear. Here, we demonstrate that the nucleosome remodeling and deacetylase (NuRD) complex is asymmetrically segregated into the surviving daughter cell rather than the apoptotic one during ACDs in Caenorhabditis elegans. The absence of NuRD triggers apoptosis via the EGL-1-CED-9-CED-4-CED-3 pathway, while an ectopic gain of NuRD enables apoptotic daughter cells to survive. We identify the vacuolar H+–adenosine triphosphatase (V-ATPase) complex as a crucial regulator of NuRD’s asymmetric segregation. V-ATPase interacts with NuRD and is asymmetrically segregated into the surviving daughter cell. Inhibition of V-ATPase disrupts cytosolic pH asymmetry and NuRD asymmetry. We suggest that asymmetric segregation of V-ATPase may cause distinct acidification levels in the two daughter cells, enabling asymmetric epigenetic inheritance that specifies their respective life-versus-death fates.