Differential 3’ processing of specific transcripts expands regulatory and protein diversity across neuronal cell types

  1. Saša Jereb
  2. Hun-Way Hwang
  3. Eric Van Otterloo
  4. Eve-Ellen Govek
  5. John J Fak
  6. Yuan Yuan
  7. Mary E Hatten
  8. Robert B Darnell  Is a corresponding author
  1. The Rockefeller University, United States
  2. University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, United States
6 figures, 1 table and 10 additional files

Figures

Figure 1 with 2 supplements
cTag-PAPERCLIP identifies 3’UTR isoforms expressed in specific neuronal types.

(A) Schematic of the cTag-PAPERCLIP approach. Breeding of cTag-PABP mice with Cre-expressing mice restricts expression of PABPC1-GFP to the cells of interest (B) Immunostaining of cerebella from …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.34042.002
Figure 1—figure supplement 1
Comparison between total uniquely mapped cTag-PAPERCLIP reads per gene and TRAP-Seq Reads Per Kilobase per Million mapped reads (RPKM) per gene from granule cells.

R: Pearson correlation coefficient. Granule cell markers are highlighted in pink and non-target cell markers are highlighted in green. The data were derived from analysis of three replicates of …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.34042.003
Figure 1—figure supplement 2
Comparison of marker gene ranks from non-target cell types in cTag-PAPERCLIP data and TRAP-Seq data in Purkinje cells.

We used the markers of granule cells and Bergmann glia shown in green in Figure 1E. Mann-Whitney test. p-value<0.001. The highest expressed gene has a rank of 1.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.34042.004
Figure 2 with 2 supplements
Differences in APA between Purkinje and granule cells.

(A) Scatterplot representing the ratio between the number of cTag-PAPERCLIP reads at the end of the proximal 3’UTR isoform and the number of cTag-PAPERCLIP reads at the end of the distal 3’UTR …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.34042.005
Figure 2—figure supplement 1
TRAP-Seq data for genes shown in Figure 2B and D.

TRAP-Seq data on granule and Purkinje cells from adult mice (the data represents an average of four replicates per cell type) (Mellén et al., 2012).

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.34042.006
Figure 2—figure supplement 2
qPCR validation of 3’UTR isoform abundance differences between Purkinje and granule cells.

N = 3 for each time point for qPCR. N = 4 for cTag-PAPERCLIP on granule cells and N = 3 for cTag-PAPERCLIP on Purkinje cells. Log2(fold change) represents log2 of the ratio between the ratios of …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.34042.007
Figure 3 with 4 supplements
Changes in APA during granule cell development.

(A) Immunostaining showing cell type specific expression of conditionally tagged PABPC1 in P0 and P21 granule cells. EGL – external granule layer, PCL – Purkinje cell layer, IGL – internal granule …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.34042.008
Figure 3—figure supplement 1
The number of cTag-PAPERCLIP reads per gene is correlated with RNA sequencing reads per kilobase (RPK) per gene.

Comparison between cTag-PAPERCLIP data from granule cell precursors at P0 (average of three replicates) and RNA-seq data (average of three replicates) from the same population purified by FACS. R: …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.34042.009
Figure 3—figure supplement 2
RNA-seq data for genes shown in Figure 3C and E.

RNA-Seq data on FACS-sorted granule cell precursors (from P0 mice) and differentiated granule cells (from P21 mice). The data represents an average of three replicates per time point.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.34042.010
Figure 3—figure supplement 3
qPCR validation of 3’UTR isoform abundance differences between P0 and P21 granule cells.

N = 3 for each time point for both qPCR and cTag-PAPERCLIP. Log2(fold change) represents log2 of the ratio between the ratios of distal 3’UTR isoform abundance over total mRNA abundance in P21 vs. …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.34042.011
Figure 3—figure supplement 4
Distribution of log2 fold changes in ribosome-associated mRNA abundance between P0 and P21 cerebellar granule cells for groups of genes exhibiting significant differences in 3’UTR isoform expression during development.

Distribution of log2 fold-changes (logFC) in ribosome-associated mRNA abundance between P0 and P21 for genes with two 3’UTR isoforms that do not show significant changes in 3’UTR isoform expression …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.34042.012
Increase in expression of distal 3’UTR isoforms during development is cell-type specific.

(A) Overlap between genes that exhibit a significant shift towards distal 3’UTR isoform expression during granule cell development (blue circle) and genes that express significantly more of the …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.34042.013
Figure 5 with 2 supplements
Memo1 expression is developmentally regulated by miR-124 and APA.

(A) cTag-PAPERCLIP reads on Memo1 3’UTR in P0 and P21 granule cells. The location of miR-124 target site is indicated by the green bar. The data represents and average of three cTag-PAPERCLIP …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.34042.014
Figure 5—figure supplement 1
Memo1 changes APA during granule cell development and regulates granule cell precursor proliferation.

(A) Additional data showing Memo1 APA change during granule cell development. The first two tracks from above represent cTag-PAPERCLIP data from P0 and P21 granule cells. The tracks below …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.34042.015
Figure 5—figure supplement 2
A model for Memo1 post-transcriptional regulation during development.

In the model, Memo1 acquires a longer 3’UTR during granule cell development, which subsequently leads to its downregulation due to the presence of a conserved miR-124 binding site on the long 3’UTR.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.34042.016
Author response image 1
Memo1 mature mRNA and pre-mRNA expression.

RT-qPCR data showing relative abundance of Memo1 mature mRNA and pre-mRNA in purified granule cells from P0 cerebella and whole P21 cerebella.N=3, Error bars: SEM. Memo1 mRNA and pre-mRNA fold …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.34042.028

Tables

Key resources table
Reagent type (species)
or resource
DesignationSource or referenceIdentifiersAdditional information
Gene (Mus musculus)Memo1NAEntrez gene ID: 76890, Memo1 short isoform RefSeq ID: NM_133771.2
Genetic reagent (M. musculus)Neurod1-CreThe Jackson Laboratory028364
Genetic reagent (M. musculus)Pcp2-CreThe Jackson Laboratory004146
Genetic reagent (M. musculus)Atoh1-CreThe Jackson Laboratory011104
Genetic reagent (M. musculus)Pabpc1-cTagHwang et al. (2017)PMID: 28910620
Genetic reagent (M. musculus)(Tg(Neurod1-Egfp-L10a)Heiman et al. (2008)PMID: 19013281
Genetic reagent (M. musculus)(Tg(Pcp2-Egfp-L10a)Heiman et al. (2008)PMID: 19013281
Genetic reagent (M. musculus)Memo1 knockoutVan Otterloo et al., 2016PMID: 26746790Memo1 ki/ki
Antibodyanti-GFP (for cTag-PAPERCLIP)Heiman et al. (2008)19F7 and 19C8mouse monoclonal
Antibodyanti-Calb1Santa Cruzsc-7691goat polyclonal, (1:250)
Antibodyanti-GFP (for IF)Aves LabsGFP-1020chicken polyclonal, (1:1000)
Antibodyanti-pH3Cell Signaling9701rabbit polyclonal, (1:100)
AntibodyAlexa 488, 555 and 647 secondariesThermo Fisher(1:1000)
Sequence-based reagentmiR-124 antagomirExiqon4102200–121mmu-miR-124–3 p inhibitor 3`-fluorescein labeled, (50 nM)
Sequence-based reagentantagomir negative controlExiqon199006–100Negative control A, (50 nM)
Sequence-based reagentMemo1 miR-124 target blockerExiqon1999993Custom miRCURY
LNA Power Inhibitor, (50 nM)
Sequence-based reagenttarget blocker negative controlExiqon199006–111Negative control A, (50 nM)
Commercial assay or kitTruSeq RNA Library Prep KitIlluminaRS-122–2002For preparing RNA-seq libraries
  1. All primers are listed in Supplementary file 7.

Additional files

Source Code 1

Supplementary file 4 - source code 1.

Source code to identify genes that exhibit significantly different 3’UTR isoform expression between granule cell precursors and mature granule cells

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.34042.017
Supplementary file 1

Genes differing in 3’UTR isoform expression between Purkinje and granule cells

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.34042.018
Supplementary file 2

Genes differing in CDS length between Purkinje and granule cells

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.34042.019
Supplementary file 3

Functional gene categories enriched among genes that differ in 3’UTR isoform expression between Purkinje and granule cells

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.34042.020
Supplementary file 4

Genes differing in 3’UTR isoform expression between granule cell precursors and mature granule cells

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.34042.021
Supplementary file 5

Genes differing in CDS length between granule cell precursors and mature granule cells

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.34042.022
Supplementary file 6

Functional gene categories enriched among genes that differ in 3’UTR isoform expression between Purkinje and granule cells

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.34042.023
Supplementary file 7

List of PCR primers used in the study

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.34042.024
Supplementary file 8

Transcripts that express more of the longer 3’UTR isoform in granule cells and are downregulated compared to Purkinje cells

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.34042.025
Transparent reporting form
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.34042.026

Download links