Regenerating hair cells in human vestibular sensory epithelia

  1. Ruth Rebecca Taylor  Is a corresponding author
  2. Anastasia Filia
  3. Ursula Paredes
  4. Yukako Asai
  5. Jeffrey R Holt
  6. Michael Lovett
  7. Andrew Forge  Is a corresponding author
  1. University College London, United Kingdom
  2. Imperial College London, United Kingdom
  3. Harvard Medical School, United States

Abstract

Human vestibular sensory epithelia in explant culture were incubated in gentamicin to ablate hair cells. Subsequent transduction of supporting cells with ATOH1 using an Ad-2 viral vector resulted in generation of highly significant numbers of cells expressing the hair cell marker protein myosin VIIa. Cells expressing myosin VIIa were also generated after blocking the Notch signalling pathway with TAPI-1 but less efficiently. Transcriptomic analysis following ATOH1 transduction confirmed up-regulation of 335 putative hair cell marker genes, including several downstream targets of ATOH1. Morphological analysis revealed numerous cells bearing dense clusters of microvilli at the apical surfaces which showed some hair cell-like characteristics confirming a degree of conversion of supporting cells. However, no cells bore organised hair bundles and several expected hair cell markers genes were not expressed suggesting incomplete differentiation. Nevertheless, the results show a potential to induce conversion of supporting cells in the vestibular sensory tissues of humans.

Data availability

All sequencing data from all of these samples have been deposited in NCBI GEO (accession number: GSE109320)

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Ruth Rebecca Taylor

    UCL Ear Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    Ruth.r.taylor@ucl.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Anastasia Filia

    National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Ursula Paredes

    UCL Ear Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Yukako Asai

    FM Kirby Neurobiology Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Jeffrey R Holt

    FM Kirby Neurobiology Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Michael Lovett

    National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Andrew Forge

    UCL Ear Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    a.forge@ucl.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0995-0219

Funding

Medical Research Council (Project grant,G1000068)

  • Ruth Rebecca Taylor
  • Andrew Forge

Dunhill Medical Trust (Project grant R395/1114)

  • Andrew Forge

Rosetrees Trust (Project grant M58-F1)

  • Andrew Forge

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: Ethical approval from NHS Health Research Authority, NRES Committee London -Surrey Borders. REC reference 11/LO/0475; IRAS project ID 73422. Tissue was collected anonymously with informed consent of the patient for tissue harvesting and publication of the results of the study.

Copyright

© 2018, Taylor et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,947
    views
  • 397
    downloads
  • 42
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.34817

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Yisi Liu, Pu Wang ... Hongwei Zhou
    Short Report

    The increasing use of tissue clearing techniques underscores the urgent need for cost-effective and simplified deep imaging methods. While traditional inverted confocal microscopes excel in high-resolution imaging of tissue sections and cultured cells, they face limitations in deep imaging of cleared tissues due to refractive index mismatches between the immersion media of objectives and sample container. To overcome these challenges, the RIM-Deep was developed to significantly improve deep imaging capabilities without compromising the normal function of the confocal microscope. This system facilitates deep immunofluorescence imaging of the prefrontal cortex in cleared macaque tissue, extending imaging depth from 2 mm to 5 mm. Applied to an intact and cleared Thy1-EGFP mouse brain, the system allowed for clear axonal visualization at high imaging depth. Moreover, this advancement enables large-scale, deep 3D imaging of intact tissues. In principle, this concept can be extended to any imaging modality, including existing inverted wide-field, confocal, and two-photon microscopy. This would significantly upgrade traditional laboratory configurations and facilitate the study of connectomes in the brain and other tissues.

    1. Neuroscience
    Damian Koevoet, Laura Van Zantwijk ... Christoph Strauch
    Research Article

    What determines where to move the eyes? We recently showed that pupil size, a well-established marker of effort, also reflects the effort associated with making a saccade (‘saccade costs’). Here, we demonstrate saccade costs to critically drive saccade selection: when choosing between any two saccade directions, the least costly direction was consistently preferred. Strikingly, this principle even held during search in natural scenes in two additional experiments. When increasing cognitive demand experimentally through an auditory counting task, participants made fewer saccades and especially cut costly directions. This suggests that the eye-movement system and other cognitive operations consume similar resources that are flexibly allocated among each other as cognitive demand changes. Together, we argue that eye-movement behavior is tuned to adaptively minimize saccade-inherent effort.