High-quality ultrastructural preservation using cryofixation for 3D electron microscopy of genetically labeled tissues
Abstract
Electron microscopy (EM) offers unparalleled power to study cell substructures at the nanoscale. Cryofixation by high-pressure freezing offers optimal morphological preservation, as it captures cellular structures instantaneously in their near-native states. However, the applicability of cryofixation is limited by its incompatibilities with diaminobenzidine labeling using genetic EM tags and the high-contrast en bloc staining required for serial block-face scanning electron microscopy (SBEM). In addition, it is challenging to perform correlated light and electron microscopy (CLEM) with cryofixed samples. Consequently, these powerful methods cannot be applied to address questions requiring optimal morphological preservation. Here we developed an approach that overcomes these limitations; it enables genetically labeled, cryofixed samples to be characterized with SBEM and 3D CLEM. Our approach is broadly applicable, as demonstrated in cultured cells, Drosophila olfactory organ and mouse brain. This optimization exploits the potential of cryofixation, allowing quality ultrastructural preservation for diverse EM applications.
Data availability
A source data file has been provided for Figure 4 (Figure 4-source data 1). The SBEM volume of a Drosophila antenna presented in this study has been deposited to the Cell Image Library. The SBEM volume, the tdTomato confocal volume and the DRAQ5 confocal volume used for 3D CLEM in a mouse brain (corresponding to Figure 5) have also been deposited to the Cell Image Library. The video of 3D CLEM in a mouse brain expressing tdTomato that corresponds to Figure 5-video supplement 1 has been deposited to the Cell Image Library.
-
SBEM of Drosophila antenna (10x UAS-myc-APEX2-Orco; Or47b-GAL4)Publicly available at the Cell Image Library under accession number CIL:50452.
-
SBEM volume used for 3D CLEM in mouse brainPublicly available at the Cell Image Library under accession number CIL:50451.
-
tdTomato confocal volume used for 3D CLEM in a mouse brainPublicly available at the Cell Image Library under accession number CIL:50453.
-
DRAQ5 confocal volume used for 3D CLEM in a mouse brainPublicly available at the Cell Image Library under accession number CIL:50454.
-
Video of 3D CLEM in a mouse brain expressing tdTomatoPublicly available at the Cell Image Library under accession number CIL:50401.
Article and author information
Author details
Funding
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01DC015519)
- Chih-Ying Su
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P41GM103412)
- Mark H Ellisman
Croucher Foundation
- Tin Ki Tsang
Kavli Foundation (2015-004)
- Chih-Ying Su
- Mark H Ellisman
Ray Thomas Edwards Foundation
- Chih-Ying Su
Frontiers of Innovation Scholars Program
- Tin Ki Tsang
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM086197)
- Daniela Boassa
Kavli Foundation (2016-038)
- Daniela Boassa
- Davide Dulcis
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Reviewing Editor
- Moritz Helmstaedter, Max Planck Institute for Brain Research, Germany
Version history
- Received: January 30, 2018
- Accepted: May 9, 2018
- Accepted Manuscript published: May 11, 2018 (version 1)
- Version of Record published: June 5, 2018 (version 2)
- Version of Record updated: June 6, 2018 (version 3)
Copyright
© 2018, Tsang et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 7,742
- Page views
-
- 1,224
- Downloads
-
- 42
- Citations
Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, Scopus, PubMed Central.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
- Neuroscience
Ultrasonic vocalizations (USVs) fulfill an important role in communication and navigation in many species. Because of their social and affective significance, rodent USVs are increasingly used as a behavioral measure in neurodevelopmental and neurolinguistic research. Reliably attributing USVs to their emitter during close interactions has emerged as a difficult, key challenge. If addressed, all subsequent analyses gain substantial confidence. We present a hybrid ultrasonic tracking system, Hybrid Vocalization Localizer (HyVL), that synergistically integrates a high-resolution acoustic camera with high-quality ultrasonic microphones. HyVL is the first to achieve millimeter precision (~3.4–4.8 mm, 91% assigned) in localizing USVs, ~3× better than other systems, approaching the physical limits (mouse snout ~10 mm). We analyze mouse courtship interactions and demonstrate that males and females vocalize in starkly different relative spatial positions, and that the fraction of female vocalizations has likely been overestimated previously due to imprecise localization. Further, we find that when two male mice interact with one female, one of the males takes a dominant role in the interaction both in terms of the vocalization rate and the location relative to the female. HyVL substantially improves the precision with which social communication between rodents can be studied. It is also affordable, open-source, easy to set up, can be integrated with existing setups, and reduces the required number of experiments and animals.
-
- Neuroscience
How does the human brain combine information across the eyes? It has been known for many years that cortical normalization mechanisms implement ‘ocularity invariance’: equalizing neural responses to spatial patterns presented either monocularly or binocularly. Here, we used a novel combination of electrophysiology, psychophysics, pupillometry, and computational modeling to ask whether this invariance also holds for flickering luminance stimuli with no spatial contrast. We find dramatic violations of ocularity invariance for these stimuli, both in the cortex and also in the subcortical pathways that govern pupil diameter. Specifically, we find substantial binocular facilitation in both pathways with the effect being strongest in the cortex. Near-linear binocular additivity (instead of ocularity invariance) was also found using a perceptual luminance matching task. Ocularity invariance is, therefore, not a ubiquitous feature of visual processing, and the brain appears to repurpose a generic normalization algorithm for different visual functions by adjusting the amount of interocular suppression.