Abstract

We generated a library of ~1,000 Drosophila stocks in which we inserted a construct in the intron of genes allowing expression of GAL4 under control of endogenous promoters while arresting transcription with a polyadenylation signal 3' of the GAL4. This allows numerous applications. First, ~90% of insertions in essential genes cause a severe loss-of-function phenotype, an effective way to mutagenize genes. Interestingly, 12/14 chromosomes engineered through CRISPR do not carry second-site lethal mutations. Second, 26/36(70%) of lethal insertions tested are rescued with a single UAS-cDNA construct. Third, loss-of-function phenotypes associated with many GAL4 insertions can be reverted by excision with UAS-flippase. Fourth, GAL4 driven UAS-GFP/RFP reports tissue and cell type specificity of gene expression with high sensitivity. We report the expression of hundreds of genes not previously reported. Finally, inserted cassettes can be replaced with GFP or any DNA. These stocks comprise a powerful resource for assessing gene function.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Pei-Tseng Lee

    Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7501-7881
  2. Jonathan Zirin

    Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Oguz Kanca

    Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Wen-Wen Lin

    Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Karen L Schulze

    Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1368-729X
  6. David Li-Kroeger

    Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Rong Tao

    Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Colby Devereaux

    Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Yanhui Hu

    Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Verena Chung

    Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Ying Fang

    Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Yuchun He

    Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Hongling Pan

    Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  14. Ming Ge

    Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  15. Zhongyuan Zuo

    Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  16. Benjamin E Housden

    Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9134-4279
  17. Stephanie E Mohr

    Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9639-7708
  18. Shinya Yamamoto

    Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2172-8036
  19. Robert W Levis

    Department of Embryology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Carnegie Institution for Science, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  20. Allan C Spradling

    Department of Embryology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Carnegie Institution for Science, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    Allan C Spradling, Reviewing editor, eLife.
  21. Norbert Perrimon

    Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7542-472X
  22. Hugo J Bellen

    Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    For correspondence
    hbellen@bcm.edu
    Competing interests
    Hugo J Bellen, Reviewing editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5992-5989

Funding

National Institutes of Health (R01GM067858)

  • Pei-Tseng Lee

Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center (5 P30 CA06516)

  • Stephanie E Mohr

Howard Hughes Medical Institute

  • Karen L Schulze

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM084947)

  • Norbert Perrimon

Howard Hughes Medical Institute

  • Yuchun He

Howard Hughes Medical Institute

  • Hongling Pan

Howard Hughes Medical Institute

  • Stephanie E Mohr

Howard Hughes Medical Institute

  • Robert W Levis

Howard Hughes Medical Institute

  • Allan C Spradling

Howard Hughes Medical Institute

  • Norbert Perrimon

Howard Hughes Medical Institute

  • Hugo J Bellen

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (U54HD083092)

  • Hugo J Bellen

National Institutes of Health (U54NS093793)

  • Shinya Yamamoto

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM067761)

  • Jonathan Zirin

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM067761)

  • Yanhui Hu

Robert A. and Renee E. Belfer Family Foundation

  • Hugo J Bellen

Huffington Foundation

  • Shinya Yamamoto

Alzheimer's Association (NIRH-15-364099)

  • Shinya Yamamoto

Simons Foundation (368479)

  • Shinya Yamamoto

Naman Family Fund for Basic Research

  • Shinya Yamamoto

Caroline Wiess Law Fund

  • Shinya Yamamoto

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM067761)

  • Stephanie E Mohr

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. K VijayRaghavan, National Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, India

Version history

  1. Received: January 31, 2018
  2. Accepted: March 16, 2018
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: March 22, 2018 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: April 13, 2018 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2018, Lee et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 20,993
    views
  • 2,594
    downloads
  • 208
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Pei-Tseng Lee
  2. Jonathan Zirin
  3. Oguz Kanca
  4. Wen-Wen Lin
  5. Karen L Schulze
  6. David Li-Kroeger
  7. Rong Tao
  8. Colby Devereaux
  9. Yanhui Hu
  10. Verena Chung
  11. Ying Fang
  12. Yuchun He
  13. Hongling Pan
  14. Ming Ge
  15. Zhongyuan Zuo
  16. Benjamin E Housden
  17. Stephanie E Mohr
  18. Shinya Yamamoto
  19. Robert W Levis
  20. Allan C Spradling
  21. Norbert Perrimon
  22. Hugo J Bellen
(2018)
A gene-specific T2A-GAL4 library for Drosophila
eLife 7:e35574.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.35574

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.35574

Further reading

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    Oguz Kanca, Jonathan Zirin ... Hugo J Bellen
    Research Advance Updated

    We previously reported a CRISPR-mediated knock-in strategy into introns of Drosophila genes, generating an attP-FRT-SA-T2A-GAL4-polyA-3XP3-EGFP-FRT-attP transgenic library for multiple uses (Lee et al., 2018a). The method relied on double stranded DNA (dsDNA) homology donors with ~1 kb homology arms. Here, we describe three new simpler ways to edit genes in flies. We create single stranded DNA (ssDNA) donors using PCR and add 100 nt of homology on each side of an integration cassette, followed by enzymatic removal of one strand. Using this method, we generated GFP-tagged proteins that mark organelles in S2 cells. We then describe two dsDNA methods using cheap synthesized donors flanked by 100 nt homology arms and gRNA target sites cloned into a plasmid. Upon injection, donor DNA (1 to 5 kb) is released from the plasmid by Cas9. The cassette integrates efficiently and precisely in vivo. The approach is fast, cheap, and scalable.

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Developmental Biology
    F Javier DeHaro-Arbona, Charalambos Roussos ... Sarah Bray
    Research Article

    Developmental programming involves the accurate conversion of signalling levels and dynamics to transcriptional outputs. The transcriptional relay in the Notch pathway relies on nuclear complexes containing the co-activator Mastermind (Mam). By tracking these complexes in real time, we reveal that they promote the formation of a dynamic transcription hub in Notch ON nuclei which concentrates key factors including the Mediator CDK module. The composition of the hub is labile and persists after Notch withdrawal conferring a memory that enables rapid reformation. Surprisingly, only a third of Notch ON hubs progress to a state with nascent transcription, which correlates with polymerase II and core Mediator recruitment. This probability is increased by a second signal. The discovery that target-gene transcription is probabilistic has far-reaching implications because it implies that stochastic differences in Notch pathway output can arise downstream of receptor activation.